The recent series of gravitational-wave (GW) detections by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observatories launched the new field of GW astronomy. As the sensitivity of GW detectors is limited by quantum noise of light, concepts from quantum metrology have been adapted to increase the observational range. Since 2010, squeezed light with reduced quantum noise has been used for improved sensitivity at signal frequencies above 100 Hz. However, 100 m long optical filter resonators would be required to also improve the sensitivity at lower frequencies, adding significant cost and complexity. Here we report on a proof-of-principle setup of an alternative concept that achieves the broadband noise reduction by using Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) entangled states instead. We show that the desired sensitivity improvement can then be obtained with the signal-recycling resonator that is already part of current observatories, providing the viable alternative to high-cost filter cavities.
The recent series of gravitational-wave (GW) detections by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observatories launched the new field of GW astronomy. As the sensitivity of GW detectors is limited by quantum noise of light, concepts from quantum metrology have been adapted to increase the observational range. Since 2010, squeezed light with reduced quantum noise has been used for improved sensitivity at signal frequencies above 100 Hz. However, 100 m long optical filter resonators would be required to also improve the sensitivity at lower frequencies, adding significant cost and complexity. Here we report on a proof-of-principle setup of an alternative concept that achieves the broadband noise reduction by using Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) entangled states instead. We show that the desired sensitivity improvement can then be obtained with the signal-recycling resonator that is already part of current observatories, providing the viable alternative to high-cost filter cavities.
A third generation of ground-based GW observatories aims at a sensitivity improvement by a factor of ten over the current second generation at high signal frequencies, and more than a factor of 1000 at low signal frequencies[1-3]. The vastly increased low-frequency sensitivity means that binary merger signals will enter the detectable frequency band much earlier. In some cases, binary neutron-star signals will enter the detection band many hours before the final merger giving enough time for an initial sky localisation and alert of optical telescopes[4]. These would then be able to witness the emergence of a kilonova at the precise moment of coalescence, rather than 10 hours later as in the case of GW170817[5].To increase the measured GW signal strength, future ground-based observatories will have longer arms and will use higher light powers. Heavier mirrors, larger laser spots on the mirrors, cryo-cooled mirrors and possibly an underground location all help to reduce the zoo of different noise sources. Light with a squeezed uncertainty of its electromagnetic field[6-8] targets the reduction of interferometer quantum noise, separate from scaling up light power[9-11]. Squeezing in one of the field quadratures, independently of the signal frequency, has been employed to reduce the observatory’s shot-noise[12,13] and has been improving the sensitivity of GEO 600 since 2010[14]. Since the third observing run O3, it also has been regularly used in the Advanced LIGO detectors and in Advanced Virgo. For a broadband simultaneous reduction of photon shot-noise (quantum measurement noise) as well as photon radiation pressure noise (quantum back-action noise), the squeezed quadrature needs to change from amplitude to phase (signal) quadrature depending on the signal frequency[15,16], cf. Fig. 1. The optimal, frequency-dependent squeeze angle can be produced by reflecting frequency-independent squeezed light off low-loss narrow-band filter cavities[17-19]. Even with cavity mirrors of highest quality and operation in ultra-high vacuum, appropriate filter cavities must have lengths of the order of hundred meters to achieve the linewidth and loss requirements[20]. Recently, Y. Ma and co-workers proposed to avoid these cost-intensive filter cavities[21] by exploiting (i) the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) entanglement[22-24] between different frequency components of the injected squeezed field[25,26] and (ii) the signal-recycling cavity that is already part of current and future GW observatories. The same approach is also useful in detuned signal-recycled interferometers without radiation-pressure noise[27].
Fig. 1
Simulation of the improvement in readout quantum noise of a typical laser interferometer with squeezed light for GW detection. (a) Sensitivity to GW strain: baseline detector without quantum enhancements (dash-dotted black); with conventional squeezing (dashed green) the sensitivity degrades at low frequency; with optimal frequency-dependent squeezing (solid blue) the sensitivity is improved over all frequency band. (b-c) Relative quantum-noise improvement with regard to baseline sensitivity as a function of signal sideband frequency and readout angle. (b) In the case of injected frequency-independent squeezing, the quantum noise is improved in the signal quadrature at high sideband frequencies. However, quantum back-action (coupled via radiation pressure) leads to a rotation of the squeeze angle, worsening the readout at low frequencies. Curved blue band shows the rotation of the squeeze quadrature away from the signal quadrature as a function of frequency. (c) Broadband improvement could be achieved with a frequency-dependent squeeze angle, which would compensate this rotation (yielding the horizontal blue band). So far, this necessitated a complicated hardware processing with additional filter cavities. The EPR scheme demonstrated here can generate such a frequency-independent spectrum without the need for these filter cavities.
Here, we report on the experimental proof of principle of the original proposal[21]. In our experiment, a linear optical cavity represented the GW observatory signal-recycling cavity. Onto this cavity, we mode-matched a conventional, frequency-independent squeezed field. Employing bichromatic (two-frequency) balanced homodyne readout, we demonstrated that the unwanted effect on quantum noise caused by a detuning of the cavity can be undone by conditioning the measurement at the signal frequency on the measurement at the corresponding, EPR-correlated idler frequency. Our scheme corresponds to a realisation of the EPR gedanken experiment[22], where a measurement at location A instantaneously results in reality of the entangled quantity at location B.
Quantum measurement process
In interferometric gravitational-wave detectors, optomechanical interaction between the light and the test-mass mirrors induces correlations in quantum noise due to the ponderomotive squeezing effect[16]: quantum fluctuations in the amplitude quadrature of the light create fluctuating radiation pressure forces on the suspended mirrors. The resulting motion in turn couples into the phase quadrature of the reflected light, and the amplitude and phase quadratures of the light become quantum correlated. Mathematically, this coupling defines the relation between the input and output quadratures in a tuned interferometer (omitting the unimportant phase factor)[17]:
where the optomechanical coupling is described by the coupling strength (Kimble factor) 𝒦(Ω) that depends on the signal frequency Ω: The Kimble factor depends on the light power inside the arm cavities of the detector I and their length L, as well as the on the optical linewidth of the detector γ, the mass of the mirrors M, the laser wavelength λ, and all frequencies are given in radians. Its frequency dependence has contributions from the cavity Lorentzian profile γ2 + Ω2 and from the mechanical response of the free test mass Ω2. The Kimble factor becomes larger at lower sideband frequencies, which is exactly the effect of radiation pressure noise contaminating the low-frequency sensitivity The radiation pressure noise at low frequencies can therefore be reduced by squeezing the amplitude quadrature At the same time the shot noise in phase quadrature dominates the high frequency sensitivity: and thus calls for squeezing the phase quadrature This frequency dependence of the quantum noise in the interferometer is shown on the Fig. 1(a), which illustrates the need for frequency-dependent squeezing. When such frequency-dependent squeezing is injected from the outside, the detected noise in the phase quadrature takes the form with squeeze factor r and a frequency-dependent squeeze angle ϕ ≡ ϕ(Ω). A straightforward optimization leads to ϕ(Ω) = arctan 𝒦(Ω), which results in optimally reduced noise at all frequencies, compare with Eq.(2). The effect of the frequency-dependent squeezing on the quantum noise can be seen in Fig. 1(b).The frequency-dependent rotation of quadratures by radiation-pressure noise has the same effect on the quantum noise as detuning a cavity without movable mirrors from its resonance by δ. In this case the coupling constant in Eq. (4) is replaced by 𝒦cav(Ω, δ) = 2γδ/ (γ2 − δ2 + Ω2)[16]. While generally the frequency dependence of the two coupling factors is different, in the case of optimal detuning δ = γ within the cavity linewidth γ ≫ Ω they become equivalent up to a scaling factor: 𝒦(Ω) ≈ 2J/(γΩ2) = 𝒦cav(Ω, γ)J/γ3. This symmetry between a detuned cavity and the ponderomotive squeezing effect explains the need for a detuned filter cavity for producing the frequency-dependent squeezing that reduces the quantum noise at all frequencies. When squeezing is reflected off a detuned filter cavity, the frequency dependence that its angle acquires can be exactly opposite to the one caused by the radiation pressure inside the detector, and the two cancel each other. This results in the frequency-independent sensitivity enhancement, as illustrated in Fig. 1(b). Such a frequency dependence is possible to create with EPR-entangled states of light, following the proposal by Ma et al.[21]. While we do not demonstrate the ponderomotive squeezing effect in our experiment, the above relations allow us to emulate it with a detuned cavity.
Generation of EPR entanglement
We produced light with a squeezed quantum uncertainty by subthreshold pumping of a non-degenerate cavity-enhanced parametric amplifier. It naturally consisted of mutually entangled electric fields at lower (signal ωS) and higher (idler ωI) sidebands of the central frequency, which was half the pump frequency ωpump/2 = ωI + ωS. Measuring the quadrature noise at ωS,I±Ω individually with two separate homodyne detectors leads to an increased noise over the vacuum uncertainty. However, the measurement outcome at one detector could be conditioned (i.e. in post-processing) on the measurement outcome of the other detector with an optional scaling factor g. Then, for sufficiently high squeeze factors, the conditional variances and could be reduced to below the vacuum uncertainty (conditional squeezing), certifying Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen entanglement[23].
Experimental realization
For our experimental demonstration of interferometer enhancement through EPR entanglement, we employed a setup as shown in Fig. 2. A squeezed-light source provided a broadband squeeze spectrum with a full-width half-maximum of 2π × 2140 MHz. Inside this linewidth, fields at ωpump/2 ± Δω show mutually strong EPR correlations, of which we select the signal and idler bands around ωS and ωI for our discussion. A standing-wave cavity mimicked the signal recycling cavity of a GW detector. We chose its free spectral range Δ ≈ 2π × 60 MHz to be well within the squeeze spectrum. The cavity could be locked to arbitrary detunings with an auxiliary field ωlock that was orthogonally polarized such as to not contaminate the measurement output. The squeezed field ωS,I was mode-matched onto the linear cavity and the back-reflected light was separated with a Faraday rotator and a polarizing beamsplitter. We then performed bichromatic balanced homodyne detection[28,29] by overlapping the output field with two bright fields ωLO,I and ωLO,S at a 50:50 beam splitter and detecting the difference in photo current of the two outputs. In the bichromatic homodyne readout, electric fields at ωS ± Ω and ωI ± Ω are combined in such a way that the result directly gives the total quantum noise of the detection scheme. For technical details on the setup and its implementation, see Methods.
Fig. 2
Simplified representation of this work’s experimental setup. The frequency components emitted from a broadband squeezed-light source (SLS) that are reflected off a cavity experience a frequency dependent phase that can compensate for the frequency dependence of quantum back action. If the SLS is operated at particular centre frequency, the signalrecycling cavity (SRC) can be used that already exists in every GW observatory. The EPR entangled sidebands ωI and ωS of the squeezed field are detected with a bichromatic balancedhomodyne detection (BBHD), employing local oscillators at frequencies ωLO,S and ωLO,I. The greyed-out parts indicate how the cavity of our experiment could relate to a full-scale measurement device (here, an Advanced LIGO-style Michelson interferometer with arm resonators, power-, and signal recycling). PBS, polarizing beam-splitter; FR, Faraday rotator. SRC length in our experiment was 2.5 m.
In the first step, see Fig. 3(a), we adjusted the EPR entangled field ωS,I such that ωS was slightly detuned by an offset frequency δS = 2π × 460 kHz from a resonance of the linear cavity, while ωI was exactly on the next longitudinal resonance peak, one FSR Δ away. In this configuration, measurement sidebands ±Ω around ωS received a different (unequal and opposite) phase shift, leading to a frequency-dependent quadrature rotation via the coupling factor 𝒦cav(Ω, δS). On the other hand, the sidebands around ωI received equal and opposite phase shifts, resulting in the absence of quadrature rotation, 𝒦cav(Ω, δI = 0) = 0. At the balanced-homodyne detector, quantum noise components at ωS ± Ω and ωI ± Ω were detected with frequency-independent gain and for a full 2π sweep of the local oscillator angle ζ. The resulting photo-current variance is shown in Fig. 3(a), normalized to the vacuum noise of both local oscillators. In accordance with the EPR gedanken experiment, a noise power below 0 dB demonstrates that it was possible to infer the noise components around ωS by conditioning on a measurement at ωI. Here, this was the case for sideband frequencies Ω that were much larger than the linewidth of the linear cavity. In effect, the original squeeze factor of 4 dB below shot noise was restored. The effect produced by such detuning on the readout sensitivity is similar to the one produced by the ponderomotive squeezing in Fig.1(b). However, unlike the example in Fig.1(b), at low frequencies the squeeze factor was lost at all readout angles, due to sub-optimal choice of the detuning and not optimal signal filtering. In this case, the resonance of the detuned cavity introduced an additional rotation in the squeezing angle at frequencies around δS, which meant that the quantum correlations at the signal and idler wavelengths were no longer aligned for optimal inference. As explained in Ma et al.[21], in the case of an optimal detuning δS = γ, an optimal Wiener filter would still allow to recover (most of) the correlations, but it cannot be implemented in our bichromatic BHD readout scheme, where the two weights of two channels are defined by the optical powers of local oscillators, and are intrinsically frequency-independent.
Fig. 3
The schematics in the top row show the relative positions of signal and idler bands around ωI and ωS in our demonstration of frequency-dependent squeeze angle rotation. Electric fields at frequencies symmetrically located around half the SLS pump frequency, ωpump/2, are mutually EPR entangled. Two SR cavity resonances, shown in yellow shade, are separated by a free spectral range (FSR) ∆, which is well within the squeezing bandwidth (dashed blue line). The phase aquired by the sidebands ωS
± Ω and ωI
± Ω upon reflection off the SRC is shown in magenta line. The spectrograms in the middle show the measured quantum noise variances, normalized to the vacuum noise, for continuously scanned readout angle. The bottom plots present cuts of the spectrogram at phase, intermediate and amplitude readout quadratures: light traces show experimental data; dark traces show theoretical fits with a joint set of parameters. (a) The signal band around ωS is detuned from cavity resonance by δS = 2π × 460 kHz, the idler band around ωI is held exactly on the next resonance. The detuning causes a frequency-dependent rotation of the squeeze angle at frequencies below ~ 1 MHz, much as the radiation pressure does in Fig.1(b). As a result, quantum noise in the phase readout quadrature is worsened. The exact frequency dependence is a function of the detuning related to the cavity linewidth, see Methods for details. (b) Both ωS and ωI are detuned from cavity resonances by the same but opposite amount δS, and EPR entangled fields at all sidebands Ω receive the same frequency-dependent phase shift. As a result, the detrimental effect of detuning (and/or ponderomotive squeezing) on the detection quantum noise can be cancelled and a flat, frequency-independent squeezed spectrum is obtained, see Fig.1(c) for comparison. The features at around 100 kHz and 1.4 MHz are experimental artefacts caused by our phase control scheme.
In the second step, Fig. 3(b), we detuned ωI away from the cavity resonance as well, by δI = −δS. In this configuration, the noise sidebands around ωI experienced equal, but opposite phase shifts to the noise sidebands around ωS. As a result, the two measurement bases were optimally aligned at all frequencies, thus cancelling the frequency-dependent rotation everywhere. The resulting spectrum of the noise, as inferred from EPR correlations, shows a constant squeeze factor for a single squeezing quadrature, demonstrating near-perfect inference of the quantum noise components around ωS from the components around ωI. The detrimental effect of the cavity detuning in the first step on the sensitivity in phase readout is fully compensated by additional frequency-dependent rotation in the idler beam. This validates the proposed scheme for quantum-noise enhancement with EPR-entangled states.Finally, we performed an additional step, not motivated by the gravitational-wave detection directly, but demonstrating the flexibility and the potential of the experimental setup. For that we detuned ωI away from the cavity resonance in another direction, by δI = δS, see Fig. 4. As a result, the noise sidebands around ωI were phase shifted by the same amount as the ones around ωS. The resulting squeezing spectrum acquired frequency dependence, spanning a larger phase range than in the first step of the experiment. This demonstrates the possibility to create a desired frequency-dependent squeezing spectrum by carefully tuning the filter cavities.
Fig. 4
This figure shows the results of an additional experimental step demonstrating the flexibility of the setup. In this case both ωS and ωI are detuned from cavity resonance in the same direction and by the same amount δS = δI = 2π×460 kHz, leading to a frequency-dependent squeeze angle. The spectrogram shows the measured quantum noise variances for continuously scanned injected squeeze angle. The acquired frequency dependence in squeeze angle sweeps across the phase range of about 3π/4 (depending on the choice of δS this range can be tuned between 0 and π). This is larger than needed in gravitational-wave detector for cancelling the ponderomotive squeezing effect, but shows the potential of the setup in tailoring the frequency dependence of squeeze angle to the needs of quantum-optical experiment. The exact frequency dependence is ultimately a function of the cavity linewidth and the detunings. The features at around 50 kHz, 100 kHz and 1.4 MHz are experimental artefacts caused by our phase control scheme.
Conclusion
Since the third observation run, the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observatories benefit from squeezed states of light with a frequency independent squeeze angle in reducing the quantum shot noise at high signal frequencies. Due to the quantum measurement process, both observatories now have increased quantum back-action noise at low signal frequencies, which will become significant when higher light powers are used. Additional long-baseline, low-loss filter cavities are considered for resolving this issue. Here, we provide the proof of principle that the same effect can be achieved with the signal-recycling cavity, which exists already in GW observatories. Following the proposal of Ma et al.[21], we utilized Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen entanglement. As pointed out in the proposal, the approach suffers from a 3 dB noise penalty on the initial squeezing and an increased sensitivity to optical loss, both of which are due to the measurement of an additional pair of sidebands. However, in light of the high additional costs for low-loss, narrow-linewidth filter cavities, the demonstrated broadband enhancement of interferometer sensitivity through EPR entanglement can still be a viable alternative[30].Over the course of preparing this manuscript we became aware of another proof-of-principle experiment of EPR-enhanced interferometer by Yap et al.[31].
Methods
Squeezed-light source
We used a monolithic cavity-enhanced OPA to generate broadband squeezed states of light via parametric down-conversion in PPKTP. The cavity was pumped by 100 mW of light at ωpump = 2πc/(1064 nm/2).
Linear cavity
We set up a 2.5 m-long linear cavity for emulating the signal-recycling cavity of a GW detector. Its length was chosen as a compromise between still fitting on a standard optical table and a free spectral range of 2π × 58.73 MHz that is well within the bandwidth of the squeezed-light source. The mirror on the back of the cavity had a highly-reflective coating and the coupling mirror had a reflectivity of 97 % resulting in a linewidth of ~150 kHz (HWHM). The cavity was locked with the Pound-Drever-Hall method using an auxiliary field in the orthogonal polarization. We used the zero-crossing of one sideband of the resulting error signal to allow for an easy shift of the resonance frequency.
Bichromatic LO
The bichromatic local oscillator was created by a strongly phase modulated light of the frequency ωpump/2 with an electro-optic modulator. Afterwards, the upper and lower sidebands were each extracted from the carrier by filter cavities. Both sidebands were overlapped on a 50/50 beamsplitter and sent towards the detector. This method guaranteed a symmetric generation around the centre frequency of the squeezed field and the detection at entangled sideband frequencies. We used a power of 4 mW in the combined bichromatic oscillator with equal powers in both sidebands, which corresponded to equal gain of both channels in the conditioning procedure.
Theoretical modelling
We compute the input-output relations for the light fields propagating in our setup, similar to the original proposal[21,27]. The resulting spectral density of the shot noise with frequency-dependent squeezing as seen by the bichromatic homodyne detector is described by where we defined the readout efficiency η, squeeze parameter r, readout angle ζ relative to signal readout quadrature ζ = 0, the power of local oscillators α, β, and two coupling coefficients 𝒦1,2(Ω):
This equation can be used to describe the detected spectra, as shown in Fig. 3.
Authors: B P Abbott; R Abbott; T D Abbott; F Acernese; K Ackley; C Adams; T Adams; P Addesso; R X Adhikari; V B Adya; C Affeldt; M Afrough; B Agarwal; M Agathos; K Agatsuma; N Aggarwal; O D Aguiar; L Aiello; A Ain; P Ajith; B Allen; G Allen; A Allocca; P A Altin; A Amato; A Ananyeva; S B Anderson; W G Anderson; S V Angelova; S Antier; S Appert; K Arai; M C Araya; J S Areeda; N Arnaud; K G Arun; S Ascenzi; G Ashton; M Ast; S M Aston; P Astone; D V Atallah; P Aufmuth; C Aulbert; K AultONeal; C Austin; A Avila-Alvarez; S Babak; P Bacon; M K M Bader; S Bae; M Bailes; P T Baker; F Baldaccini; G Ballardin; S W Ballmer; S Banagiri; J C Barayoga; S E Barclay; B C Barish; D Barker; K Barkett; F Barone; B Barr; L Barsotti; M Barsuglia; D Barta; S D Barthelmy; J Bartlett; I Bartos; R Bassiri; A Basti; J C Batch; M Bawaj; J C Bayley; M Bazzan; B Bécsy; C Beer; M Bejger; I Belahcene; A S Bell; B K Berger; G Bergmann; S Bernuzzi; J J Bero; C P L Berry; D Bersanetti; A Bertolini; J Betzwieser; S Bhagwat; R Bhandare; I A Bilenko; G Billingsley; C R Billman; J Birch; R Birney; O Birnholtz; S Biscans; S Biscoveanu; A Bisht; M Bitossi; C Biwer; M A Bizouard; J K Blackburn; J Blackman; C D Blair; D G Blair; R M Blair; S Bloemen; O Bock; N Bode; M Boer; G Bogaert; A Bohe; F Bondu; E Bonilla; R Bonnand; B A Boom; R Bork; V Boschi; S Bose; K Bossie; Y Bouffanais; A Bozzi; C Bradaschia; P R Brady; M Branchesi; J E Brau; T Briant; A Brillet; M Brinkmann; V Brisson; P Brockill; J E Broida; A F Brooks; D A Brown; D D Brown; S Brunett; C C Buchanan; A Buikema; T Bulik; H J Bulten; A Buonanno; D Buskulic; C Buy; R L Byer; M Cabero; L Cadonati; G Cagnoli; C Cahillane; J Calderón Bustillo; T A Callister; E Calloni; J B Camp; M Canepa; P Canizares; K C Cannon; H Cao; J Cao; C D Capano; E Capocasa; F Carbognani; S Caride; M F Carney; G Carullo; J Casanueva Diaz; C Casentini; S Caudill; M Cavaglià; F Cavalier; R Cavalieri; G Cella; C B Cepeda; P Cerdá-Durán; G Cerretani; E Cesarini; S J Chamberlin; M Chan; S Chao; P Charlton; E Chase; E Chassande-Mottin; D Chatterjee; K Chatziioannou; B D Cheeseboro; H Y Chen; X Chen; Y Chen; H-P Cheng; H Chia; A Chincarini; A Chiummo; T Chmiel; H S Cho; M Cho; J H Chow; N Christensen; Q Chu; A J K Chua; S Chua; A K W Chung; S Chung; G Ciani; R Ciolfi; C E Cirelli; A Cirone; F Clara; J A Clark; P Clearwater; F Cleva; C Cocchieri; E Coccia; P-F Cohadon; D Cohen; A Colla; C G Collette; L R Cominsky; M Constancio; L Conti; S J Cooper; P Corban; T R Corbitt; I Cordero-Carrión; K R Corley; N Cornish; A Corsi; S Cortese; C A Costa; M W Coughlin; S B Coughlin; J-P Coulon; S T Countryman; P Couvares; P B Covas; E E Cowan; D M Coward; M J Cowart; D C Coyne; R Coyne; J D E Creighton; T D Creighton; J Cripe; S G Crowder; T J Cullen; A Cumming; L Cunningham; E Cuoco; T Dal Canton; G Dálya; S L Danilishin; S D'Antonio; K Danzmann; A Dasgupta; C F Da Silva Costa; V Dattilo; I Dave; M Davier; D Davis; E J Daw; B Day; S De; D DeBra; J Degallaix; M De Laurentis; S Deléglise; W Del Pozzo; N Demos; T Denker; T Dent; R De Pietri; V Dergachev; R De Rosa; R T DeRosa; C De Rossi; R DeSalvo; O de Varona; J Devenson; S Dhurandhar; M C Díaz; T Dietrich; L Di Fiore; M Di Giovanni; T Di Girolamo; A Di Lieto; S Di Pace; I Di Palma; F Di Renzo; Z Doctor; V Dolique; F Donovan; K L Dooley; S Doravari; I Dorrington; R Douglas; M Dovale Álvarez; T P Downes; M Drago; C Dreissigacker; J C Driggers; Z Du; M Ducrot; R Dudi; P Dupej; S E Dwyer; T B Edo; M C Edwards; A Effler; H-B Eggenstein; P Ehrens; J Eichholz; S S Eikenberry; R A Eisenstein; R C Essick; D Estevez; Z B Etienne; T Etzel; M Evans; T M Evans; M Factourovich; V Fafone; H Fair; S Fairhurst; X Fan; S Farinon; B Farr; W M Farr; E J Fauchon-Jones; M Favata; M Fays; C Fee; H Fehrmann; J Feicht; M M Fejer; A Fernandez-Galiana; I Ferrante; E C Ferreira; F Ferrini; F Fidecaro; D Finstad; I Fiori; D Fiorucci; M Fishbach; R P Fisher; M Fitz-Axen; R Flaminio; M Fletcher; H Fong; J A Font; P W F Forsyth; S S Forsyth; J-D Fournier; S Frasca; F Frasconi; Z Frei; A Freise; R Frey; V Frey; E M Fries; P Fritschel; V V Frolov; P Fulda; M Fyffe; H Gabbard; B U Gadre; S M Gaebel; J R Gair; L Gammaitoni; M R Ganija; S G Gaonkar; C Garcia-Quiros; F Garufi; B Gateley; S Gaudio; G Gaur; V Gayathri; N Gehrels; G Gemme; E Genin; A Gennai; D George; J George; L Gergely; V Germain; S Ghonge; Abhirup Ghosh; Archisman Ghosh; S Ghosh; J A Giaime; K D Giardina; A Giazotto; K Gill; L Glover; E Goetz; R Goetz; S Gomes; B Goncharov; G González; J M Gonzalez Castro; A Gopakumar; M L Gorodetsky; S E Gossan; M Gosselin; R Gouaty; A Grado; C Graef; M Granata; A Grant; S Gras; C Gray; G Greco; A C Green; E M Gretarsson; P Groot; H Grote; S Grunewald; P Gruning; G M Guidi; X Guo; A Gupta; M K Gupta; K E Gushwa; E K Gustafson; R Gustafson; O Halim; B R Hall; E D Hall; E Z Hamilton; G Hammond; M Haney; M M Hanke; J Hanks; C Hanna; M D Hannam; O A Hannuksela; J Hanson; T Hardwick; J Harms; G M Harry; I W Harry; M J Hart; C-J Haster; K Haughian; J Healy; A Heidmann; M C Heintze; H Heitmann; P Hello; G Hemming; M Hendry; I S Heng; J Hennig; A W Heptonstall; M Heurs; S Hild; T Hinderer; W C G Ho; D Hoak; D Hofman; K Holt; D E Holz; P Hopkins; C Horst; J Hough; E A Houston; E J Howell; A Hreibi; Y M Hu; E A Huerta; D Huet; B Hughey; S Husa; S H Huttner; T Huynh-Dinh; N Indik; R Inta; G Intini; H N Isa; J-M Isac; M Isi; B R Iyer; K Izumi; T Jacqmin; K Jani; P Jaranowski; S Jawahar; F Jiménez-Forteza; W W Johnson; N K Johnson-McDaniel; D I Jones; R Jones; R J G Jonker; L Ju; J Junker; C V Kalaghatgi; V Kalogera; B Kamai; S Kandhasamy; G Kang; J B Kanner; S J Kapadia; S Karki; K S Karvinen; M Kasprzack; W Kastaun; M Katolik; E Katsavounidis; W Katzman; S Kaufer; K Kawabe; F Kéfélian; D Keitel; A J Kemball; R Kennedy; C Kent; J S Key; F Y Khalili; I Khan; S Khan; Z Khan; E A Khazanov; N Kijbunchoo; Chunglee Kim; J C Kim; K Kim; W Kim; W S Kim; Y-M Kim; S J Kimbrell; E J King; P J King; M Kinley-Hanlon; R Kirchhoff; J S Kissel; L Kleybolte; S Klimenko; T D Knowles; P Koch; S M Koehlenbeck; S Koley; V Kondrashov; A Kontos; M Korobko; W Z Korth; I Kowalska; D B Kozak; C Krämer; V Kringel; B Krishnan; A Królak; G Kuehn; P Kumar; R Kumar; S Kumar; L Kuo; A Kutynia; S Kwang; B D Lackey; K H Lai; M Landry; R N Lang; J Lange; B Lantz; R K Lanza; S L Larson; A Lartaux-Vollard; P D Lasky; M Laxen; A Lazzarini; C Lazzaro; P Leaci; S Leavey; C H Lee; H K Lee; H M Lee; H W Lee; K Lee; J Lehmann; A Lenon; E Leon; M Leonardi; N Leroy; N Letendre; Y Levin; T G F Li; S D Linker; T B Littenberg; J Liu; X Liu; R K L Lo; N A Lockerbie; L T London; J E Lord; M Lorenzini; V Loriette; M Lormand; G Losurdo; J D Lough; C O Lousto; G Lovelace; H Lück; D Lumaca; A P Lundgren; R Lynch; Y Ma; R Macas; S Macfoy; B Machenschalk; M MacInnis; D M Macleod; I Magaña Hernandez; F Magaña-Sandoval; L Magaña Zertuche; R M Magee; E Majorana; I Maksimovic; N Man; V Mandic; V Mangano; G L Mansell; M Manske; M Mantovani; F Marchesoni; F Marion; S Márka; Z Márka; C Markakis; A S Markosyan; A Markowitz; E Maros; A Marquina; P Marsh; F Martelli; L Martellini; I W Martin; R M Martin; D V Martynov; J N Marx; K Mason; E Massera; A Masserot; T J Massinger; M Masso-Reid; S Mastrogiovanni; A Matas; F Matichard; L Matone; N Mavalvala; N Mazumder; R McCarthy; D E McClelland; S McCormick; L McCuller; S C McGuire; G McIntyre; J McIver; D J McManus; L McNeill; T McRae; S T McWilliams; D Meacher; G D Meadors; M Mehmet; J Meidam; E Mejuto-Villa; A Melatos; G Mendell; R A Mercer; E L Merilh; M Merzougui; S Meshkov; C Messenger; C Messick; R Metzdorff; P M Meyers; H Miao; C Michel; H Middleton; E E Mikhailov; L Milano; A L Miller; B B Miller; J Miller; M Millhouse; M C Milovich-Goff; O Minazzoli; Y Minenkov; J Ming; C Mishra; S Mitra; V P Mitrofanov; G Mitselmakher; R Mittleman; D Moffa; A Moggi; K Mogushi; M Mohan; S R P Mohapatra; I Molina; M Montani; C J Moore; D Moraru; G Moreno; S Morisaki; S R Morriss; B Mours; C M Mow-Lowry; G Mueller; A W Muir; Arunava Mukherjee; D Mukherjee; S Mukherjee; N Mukund; A Mullavey; J Munch; E A Muñiz; M Muratore; P G Murray; A Nagar; K Napier; I Nardecchia; L Naticchioni; R K Nayak; J Neilson; G Nelemans; T J N Nelson; M Nery; A Neunzert; L Nevin; J M Newport; G Newton; K K Y Ng; P Nguyen; T T Nguyen; D Nichols; A B Nielsen; S Nissanke; A Nitz; A Noack; F Nocera; D Nolting; C North; L K Nuttall; J Oberling; G D O'Dea; G H Ogin; J J Oh; S H Oh; F Ohme; M A Okada; M Oliver; P Oppermann; Richard J Oram; B O'Reilly; R Ormiston; L F Ortega; R O'Shaughnessy; S Ossokine; D J Ottaway; H Overmier; B J Owen; A E Pace; J Page; M A Page; A Pai; S A Pai; J R Palamos; O Palashov; C Palomba; A Pal-Singh; Howard Pan; Huang-Wei Pan; B Pang; P T H Pang; C Pankow; F Pannarale; B C Pant; F Paoletti; A Paoli; M A Papa; A Parida; W Parker; D Pascucci; A Pasqualetti; R Passaquieti; D Passuello; M Patil; B Patricelli; B L Pearlstone; M Pedraza; R Pedurand; L Pekowsky; A Pele; S Penn; C J Perez; A Perreca; L M Perri; H P Pfeiffer; M Phelps; O J Piccinni; M Pichot; F Piergiovanni; V Pierro; G Pillant; L Pinard; I M Pinto; M Pirello; M Pitkin; M Poe; R Poggiani; P Popolizio; E K Porter; A Post; J Powell; J Prasad; J W W Pratt; G Pratten; V Predoi; T Prestegard; M Prijatelj; M Principe; S Privitera; R Prix; G A Prodi; L G Prokhorov; O Puncken; M Punturo; P Puppo; M Pürrer; H Qi; V Quetschke; E A Quintero; R Quitzow-James; F J Raab; D S Rabeling; H Radkins; P Raffai; S Raja; C Rajan; B Rajbhandari; M Rakhmanov; K E Ramirez; A Ramos-Buades; P Rapagnani; V Raymond; M Razzano; J Read; T Regimbau; L Rei; S Reid; D H Reitze; W Ren; S D Reyes; F Ricci; P M Ricker; S Rieger; K Riles; M Rizzo; N A Robertson; R Robie; F Robinet; A Rocchi; L Rolland; J G Rollins; V J Roma; J D Romano; R Romano; C L Romel; J H Romie; D Rosińska; M P Ross; S Rowan; A Rüdiger; P Ruggi; G Rutins; K Ryan; S Sachdev; T Sadecki; L Sadeghian; M Sakellariadou; L Salconi; M Saleem; F Salemi; A Samajdar; L Sammut; L M Sampson; E J Sanchez; L E Sanchez; N Sanchis-Gual; V Sandberg; J R Sanders; B Sassolas; B S Sathyaprakash; P R Saulson; O Sauter; R L Savage; A Sawadsky; P Schale; M Scheel; J Scheuer; J Schmidt; P Schmidt; R Schnabel; R M S Schofield; A Schönbeck; E Schreiber; D Schuette; B W Schulte; B F Schutz; S G Schwalbe; J Scott; S M Scott; E Seidel; D Sellers; A S Sengupta; D Sentenac; V Sequino; A Sergeev; D A Shaddock; T J Shaffer; A A Shah; M S Shahriar; M B Shaner; L Shao; B Shapiro; P Shawhan; A Sheperd; D H Shoemaker; D M Shoemaker; K Siellez; X Siemens; M Sieniawska; D Sigg; A D Silva; L P Singer; A Singh; A Singhal; A M Sintes; B J J Slagmolen; B Smith; J R Smith; R J E Smith; S Somala; E J Son; J A Sonnenberg; B Sorazu; F Sorrentino; T Souradeep; A P Spencer; A K Srivastava; K Staats; A Staley; M Steinke; J Steinlechner; S Steinlechner; D Steinmeyer; S P Stevenson; R Stone; D J Stops; K A Strain; G Stratta; S E Strigin; A Strunk; R Sturani; A L Stuver; T Z Summerscales; L Sun; S Sunil; J Suresh; P J Sutton; B L Swinkels; M J Szczepańczyk; M Tacca; S C Tait; C Talbot; D Talukder; D B Tanner; M Tápai; A Taracchini; J D Tasson; J A Taylor; R Taylor; S V Tewari; T Theeg; F Thies; E G Thomas; M Thomas; P Thomas; K A Thorne; K S Thorne; E Thrane; S Tiwari; V Tiwari; K V Tokmakov; K Toland; M Tonelli; Z Tornasi; A Torres-Forné; C I Torrie; D Töyrä; F Travasso; G Traylor; J Trinastic; M C Tringali; L Trozzo; K W Tsang; M Tse; R Tso; L Tsukada; D Tsuna; D Tuyenbayev; K Ueno; D Ugolini; C S Unnikrishnan; A L Urban; S A Usman; H Vahlbruch; G Vajente; G Valdes; M Vallisneri; N van Bakel; M van Beuzekom; J F J van den Brand; C Van Den Broeck; D C Vander-Hyde; L van der Schaaf; J V van Heijningen; A A van Veggel; M Vardaro; V Varma; S Vass; M Vasúth; A Vecchio; G Vedovato; J Veitch; P J Veitch; K Venkateswara; G Venugopalan; D Verkindt; F Vetrano; A Viceré; A D Viets; S Vinciguerra; D J Vine; J-Y Vinet; S Vitale; T Vo; H Vocca; C Vorvick; S P Vyatchanin; A R Wade; L E Wade; M Wade; R Walet; M Walker; L Wallace; S Walsh; G Wang; H Wang; J Z Wang; W H Wang; Y F Wang; R L Ward; J Warner; M Was; J Watchi; B Weaver; L-W Wei; M Weinert; A J Weinstein; R Weiss; L Wen; E K Wessel; P Weßels; J Westerweck; T Westphal; K Wette; J T Whelan; S E Whitcomb; B F Whiting; C Whittle; D Wilken; D Williams; R D Williams; A R Williamson; J L Willis; B Willke; M H Wimmer; W Winkler; C C Wipf; H Wittel; G Woan; J Woehler; J Wofford; K W K Wong; J Worden; J L Wright; D S Wu; D M Wysocki; S Xiao; H Yamamoto; C C Yancey; L Yang; M J Yap; M Yazback; Hang Yu; Haocun Yu; M Yvert; A Zadrożny; M Zanolin; T Zelenova; J-P Zendri; M Zevin; L Zhang; M Zhang; T Zhang; Y-H Zhang; C Zhao; M Zhou; Z Zhou; S J Zhu; X J Zhu; A B Zimmerman; M E Zucker; J Zweizig Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 9.161