| Literature DB >> 32231592 |
Cunxin Sun1, Bo Liu1,2, Qunlan Zhou1,2, Zhe Xiong2, Fan Shan2, Huimin Zhang2.
Abstract
The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of fish oil replacement by vegetable oils on growth performance, histology, and antioxidant capacity of Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Three isonitrogenous and isoenergetic diets were formulated with different lipid sources included. DFO diet contained 6% fish oil, whereas DSO and DRO diets included 6% soybean oil and rapeseed oil (RO) as alternatives for fish oil, respectively. Prawns were fed thrice daily for 8 weeks. The results showed that prawns in DFO group showed significantly lower final weight, weight gain ratio, and specific growth rate (SGR), but higher feed intake and feed coefficient ratio than those in DSO and DRO groups. In hepatocellular ultrastructure, malformed and atrophic nucleus and higher apoptosis ratio were observed in DFO group. In addition, levels of haemolymph proinflammatory cytokines, activities of anti-superoxide anion, inducible-type NO-synthase (iNOS) and content of nitric oxide, and hepatopancreas NF-κB signal pathway gene expression in DFO group increased markedly compared to those of DSO and DRO groups. The results suggested that vegetable oils, such as soybean oil and RO might be the better lipid sources in diets for Macrobrachium rosenbergii than fish oil, it may be attributed to modified oxidative status induced by NF-κB-NO signal pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Macrobrachium rosenbergii; NF-κB/NO signal pathway; antioxidant defense; fish oil; vegetable oil
Year: 2020 PMID: 32231592 PMCID: PMC7082322 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Formulation and proximate composition of the experimental diets.
| DFO | DSO | DRO | |
| Fish meal1 | 22.00 | 22.00 | 22.00 |
| Casein2 | 24.00 | 24.00 | 24.00 |
| Gelatin1 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| α-starch3 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
| Dextrin3 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Fish oil1 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Soybean oil1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 0.00 |
| Rapeseed oil1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.00 |
| Microcystalline cellulose4 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Carboxymethyl cellulose4 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Attapulgite1 | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.53 |
| Soybean lecithin (50%)1 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Cholesterol1 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Eclosion hormone5 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| DMPT5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| choline chloride5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Vitamin premix5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Vitamin E1 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Mineral premix5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Calcium dihydrogen phosphate1 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Crude protein | 40.90 | 40.60 | 41.10 |
| Crude lipid | 8.86 | 8.55 | 8.68 |
| Gross energy (MJ kg–1) | 16.30 | 16.30 | 16.30 |
Fatty acid composition of the feed (%).
| DFO | DSO | DRO | |
| C12:0 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
| C14:0 | 2.34 | 1.06 | 1.70 |
| C15:0 | 0.41 | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| C16:0 | 29.78 | 14.54 | 10.58 |
| C16:1n-9 | 10.81 | 1.96 | 1.72 |
| C17:0 | 1.02 | 0.23 | 0.16 |
| C18:0 | 5.54 | 4.43 | 3.32 |
| C18:1n-9 | 23.95 | 22.94 | 43.86 |
| C18:2n-6 | 4.55 | 44.69 | 18.82 |
| C18:3n-6 | 0.49 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| C18:3n-3 | 1.65 | 5.17 | 5.02 |
| C20:0 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.56 |
| C20:1n-9 | 0.60 | 0.31 | 3.14 |
| C20:2n-9 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.20 |
| C20:3n-3 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| C20:4n-6 | 0.92 | 0.18 | 0.25 |
| C20:5n-3 | 12.43 | 1.61 | 2.12 |
| C22:0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| C22:1n-13 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 5.20 |
| C22:3n-3 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| C22:4n-3 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| C22:5n-3 | 0.51 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| C22:6n-3 | 4.00 | 1.64 | 2.15 |
| n-6 PUFA | 5.11 | 44.81 | 19.08 |
| n-3 PUFA | 19.84 | 9.03 | 10.06 |
Sequences of the primers used in the study.
| Gene | GenBank acc. no. | Primer sequences (5′-3′) | Length (bp) | Amplicon length (bp) | References |
| Relish | KR827675.1 | GATGAGCCTTCAGTGCCAGA | 20 | 238 | |
| CCAGGTGACGCCATGTATCA | 20 | ||||
| Dorsal | KX219631.1 | TCAGTAGCGACACCATGCAG | 20 | 200 | |
| CGAGCCTTCGAGGAACACTT | 20 | ||||
| IκBα | HQ668091.1 | AATCATACCGGAAGGACGGCGTTA | 24 | 133 | |
| TCACGGGTCTGGTTAATTGGGTCA | 24 | ||||
| IMD | CGACCACATTCTCCTCCTCCC | 21 | 184 | ||
| TTCAGTGCATCCACGTCCCTC | 21 | ||||
| Toll | KX610955.1 | TTCGTGACTTGTCGGCTCTC | 20 | 227 | |
| GCAGTTGTTGAAGGCATCGG | 20 | ||||
| β-actin | AY651918.2 | TCCGTAAGGACCTGTATGCC | 20 | 96 | |
| TCGGGAGGTGCGATGATTTT | 20 |
Growth performance and feed utilization of Macrobrachium rosenbergii fed with different dietary lipid sources.
| IW | FW | WGR | SGR | RFI | FCR | |
| DFO | 0.24 ± 0.001 | 9.4 ± 0.17a | 3859.7 ± 112.0a | 5.93 ± 0.05a | 5.88 ± 0.03b | 1.92 ± 0.01b |
| DSO | 0.24 ± 0.001 | 12.4 ± 0.21b | 4963.0 ± 61.6b | 6.33 ± 0.02b | 4.55 ± 0.37a | 1.47 ± 0.12a |
| DRO | 0.24 ± 0.003 | 11.9 ± 0.09b | 4772.5 ± 84.7b | 6.27 ± 0.03b | 5.22 ± 0.23ab | 1.68 ± 0.07ab |
FIGURE 1Transmission electron microscope images of Macrobrachium rosenbergii hepatocyte ultrastructure (1200 ×). (a) Prawns fed diet including 6% fish oil (DFO); (b) Prawns fed diet including 6% soybean oil (DSO); (c): Prawns fed diet including 6% rapeseed oil (DRO). N: nucleus; L: lipid droplet.
FIGURE 2Hepatocyte apoptosis of Macrobrachium rosenbergii. (a) Prawns fed diet including 6% fish oil (DFO); (b) Prawns fed diet including 6% soybean oil (DSO); (c) Prawns fed diet including 6% rapeseed oil (DRO); (d) Ratio of hepatopancreatic apoptosis cell (n = 3). Blue arrow: normal cells; yellow arrow: apoptotic cells.
FIGURE 3Levels of proinflammatory cytokines in hemolymph. DFO: prawns fed diet including 6% fish oil; DSO: prawns fed diet including 6% soybean oil; DRO: prawns fed diet including 6% rapeseed oil. Values are means ± SEM (n = 15). (A) IL-1 concerntration in hemolymph; (B) IL-6 concerntration in hemolymph; (C) INF-γ concerntration in hemolymph; (D) TNF-α concerntration in hemolymph. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Hemolymph oxidative status of Macrobrachium rosenbergii. DFO: prawns fed diet including 6% fish oil; DSO: prawns fed diet including 6% soybean oil; DRO: prawns fed diet including 6% rapeseed oil; ASA: arachidonic acid; iNOS: inducible-type NO-synthas; NO: nitric oxide. Values are means ± SEM (n = 15). Columns with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 5Gene expression of IMD-Relish signal pathway in hepatopancreas. DFO: prawns fed diet including 6% fish oil; DSO: prawns fed diet including 6% soybean oil; DRO: prawns fed diet including 6% rapeseed oil. Values are means ± SEM (n = 15). (A) The expression of IMD in hepatopancreas; (B) the expression of Relish in hepatopancreas. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 6Gene expression of Toll-Dorsal signal pathway in hepatopancreas. DFO: prawns fed diet including 6% fish oil; DSO: prawns fed diet including 6% soybean oil; DRO: prawns fed diet including 6% rapeseed oil. Values are means ± SEM (n = 15). (A) The expression of Toll in hepatopancreas; (B) the expression of IκBα in hepatopancreas; (C) the expression of Dorsal in hepatopancreas. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 7NF-κB/NO signaling mechanism in response to different lipid sources.