| Literature DB >> 32231440 |
Xianli Wei1, Junzi Ke2,3, Haonan Huang2,3, Shikun Zhou2,3, Ao Guo4, Kun Wang2,3, Yujuan Zhan2,3, Cong Mai5, Weizhen Ao3, Fuda Xie6,7, Rongping Luo8, Jianyong Xiao2, Hang Wei4, Bonan Chen2,3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world. Up to now, many genes associated with HCC have not yet been identified. In this study, we screened the HCC-related genes through the integrated analysis of the TCGA database, of which the potential biomarkers were also further validated by clinical specimens. The discovery of potential biomarkers for HCC provides more opportunities for diagnostic indicators or gene-targeted therapies.Entities:
Keywords: FLVCR1; NOX4; TCGA database; biomarkers; hepatocellular carcinoma
Year: 2020 PMID: 32231440 PMCID: PMC7085335 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S239795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Figure 1Ten candidate genes of HCC identified using RF algorithm. (A) Study workflow. (B) The receiver operating characteristic curve threshold was used for measuring algorithm quality. (C) The receiver operating characteristic curve of 10 important candidate genes under the RF classifier. (D) Importance value of top 10 genes.
Abbreviations: FI, feature importance; AUC, area under the curve; PPI, protein–protein interaction; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; IHC, Immunohistochemistry.
Classification Results of Three Algorithms
| Class | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1 | Average F1 | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | Positive | 92.86% | 92.86% | 92.86% | 95.99% | 99.74% |
| Negative | 99.12% | 99.12% | 99.12% | |||
| GBDT | Positive | 92.31% | 85.71% | 88.89% | 93.79% | 99.53% |
| Negative | 98.26% | 99.12% | 98.69% | |||
| DT | Positive | 73.33% | 78.57% | 75.86% | 86.41% | 92.45% |
| Negative | 97.35% | 96.92% | 96.92% |
Note: F1, comprehensive evaluation index.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; RF, random forest; DT, decision tree; GBDT, gradient boosting decision tree.
Figure 2Association of the 10 candidate genes with tumor development. (A) Three-level protein–protein interaction network results. Red boxes represent the candidate genes, and yellow and blue boxes represent first- and second-order outcome-associated genes, respectively. The width of edges varies with their confidence. (B) A heat map depicting different expression levels of the 10 candidate genes in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues versus adjacent non-tumor tissues. Green represents low expression and red represents high expression. (C) KEGG pathway analysis. (D) GO enrichment analysis results. p<0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Figure 3Upregulation of NOX4 and FLVCR1 in HCC cells. (A) Expression levels of NOX4 and FLVCR1 in normal liver cells (LO2) and HCC cells (BEL-7402, SMMC-7721, and HepG2), as determined by Western blotting. ***p<0.001 compared with LO2 cells. (B) Immunofluorescence assay of NOX4 and FLVCR1. NOX4 and FLVCR1 are labeled in red; the nucleus was stained with Hoechst (blue).
Figure 4Upregulation of NOX4 and FLVCR1 in HCC tissues. (A) Expression levels of NOX4 and FLVCR1 in HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues, as evaluated using immunohistochemical staining (×100). Expression levels of both NOX4 and FLVCR1 were higher in HCC tissues than in adjacent non-tumor tissues. (B) Western blotting showing high expression levels of NOX4 and FLVCR1 in HCC tissues. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (data compared to normal tissues). Number # indicated liver samples from different HCC patients.
Abbreviations: T, tumor tissues; N, non-tumor tissues.
Figure 5Survival analysis of NOX4 and FLVCR1. Kaplan–Meier analysis of the relationship between overall survival and expression levels of NOX4 (A) and FLVCR1 (B); Log-rank p< 0.05 indicated statistical significance.