Literature DB >> 32231395

High occurrence of β-lactamase-producing Salmonella Heidelberg from poultry origin.

Andrei I S Souza1,2, Mauro M S Saraiva1, Monique R T Casas3, Gustavo M Oliveira1, Marita V Cardozo4, Valdinete P Benevides1,2, Fernanda O Barbosa1,5, Oliveiro C Freitas Neto6, Adriana M Almeida1, Angelo Berchieri1.   

Abstract

Salmonella Heidelberg is commonly reported in foodborne outbreaks around the world, and chickens and poultry products are known as important source of these pathogen. Multidrug-resistant S. Heidelberg strains are disseminated into poultry production chair, which can lead to severe clinical infections in humans and of difficult to treat. This study aimed at evaluating the β-lactam susceptibility and genotypic relatedness of Salmonella Heidelberg at Brazilian poultry production chain. Sixty-two S. Heidelberg strains from poultry production chain (poultry, poultry meat and poultry farm) were used. All strains were evaluated to antimicrobial susceptibility by diffusion disk test, as well as β-lactam resistance genes. Genotypic relatedness was assessed by Pulsed-Field Gel Eletrophoresis, using Xba1 restriction enzyme. Forty-one strains were characterized as multidrug-resistant according to phenotype characterization. The resistance susceptibility revealed 31 distinct profiles, with higher prevalence of streptomycin (61/62), nalidixic acid (50/62), tetracycline (43/62) and β-lactam drugs (37/62). blaCMY-2 was the more frequent β-lactamase gene found (38/62); other resistance genes found were blaCTX-M (2/62), blaSHV (3/62) and blaTEM-1 (38/62). No carbapenemase genes was found. The Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis showed 58 different profiles. Strains with a larger number of antimicrobial resistance were grouped into ten major clusters apart from others. The spread of resistance by ampC continues to rise, thereby turning concern to public health, since the β-lactam antimicrobials are used as a therapeutic treatment in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32231395      PMCID: PMC7108700          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The non-typhoid Salmonella (NTS) serovar Heidelberg (SH) is frequently found affecting humans and animals [1-5]. This pathogen has been commonly isolated in food-borne outbreaks from humans through consumption of poultry and pork-derived products, as well as dairy products [6]. SH is a pathogen of nonspecific host characterized by has a variety of infection sources and easy bacterial dissemination, due to their antigenic composition [7]. In the last years, SH has been reported causing outbreaks at 13 USA states, which 33 hospitalizations [2], and confirmed as the most frequent serovar involved in human diseases (21.6%) linked to poultry meat consumption (49,9%) [5]. Moreover, the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) SH has been identified, including third generation cephalosporins [8-10], critical importance drugs to public health. The antimicrobial use in animal production is a common practice, but it has a different procedure from different parts of the world. In the United States of America and European Union, the use of antimicrobials is limited to veterinarian prescription, and they should not be used to animal performance purpose. On the other hand, in Brazil some antibiotic groups are allowed to be used in animal production system to treat or to prevent infections or even as growth promoters [11,12]. Veterinary prescription is also required but sometimes failures in the official surveillance of antimicrobial use can lead to misuse. It is known that off-label use of some antimicrobials make a selective pressure which have been associated with quickly increased of bacterial resistance in Enterobacteriaceae species, as E. coli, from farms animals [13,14]. Currently, the class of β-lactam antimicrobials have been widely used to treat serious infections in humans and animals, including third and fourth generations of cephalosporins [15,16]. However, the bacterial resistance to cephalosporins has been found in Salmonella serovars, including Heidelberg from humans [4], poultry [9,17], and poultry meat [5], all of them presenting a diverse MDR pattern. Moreover, strains of MDR SH have been reported in the USA in outbreaks caused by chicken meat [10]. In Enterobacteriaceae species, the enzymatic inhibition is the main β-lactam resistance mechanism found. Both, Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) and Restrict Spectrum β-Lactamase (AmpC) are most common enzymes synthetized by Salmonella spp. [18-21], as well as most frequently found in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from poultry meat [22]. In this scenario, wherein ESBL/AmpC-producing bacteria is not only limited to hospitals and healthcare system but reaches food animals and food chain production [22,23], the spread of resistant Salmonella Heidelberg is a relevant public health issue. Furthermore, in view of the recent concern in the field with the frequent appearance of the this serovar resistant to different antimicrobials, this work aimed to evaluate the β-lactam susceptibility and genotypic relatedness of Salmonella Heidelberg, to provide information on the Brazilian scenario.

Materials and methods

Salmonella Heidelberg isolates

Sixty-two SH isolates were used: 20 from the Avian Pathology Laboratory (FCAV, Unesp Jaboticabal, São Paulo, BR) database and 42 from Adolfo Lutz Institute (IAL, São Paulo, BR) database (S1 Table). All SH isolates were obtained from poultry-relatedness samples, and categorized into three types: Poultry (sampled from cloacal swabs and cecal contents); Poultry farm (sampled from drag swabs, poultry feeders and drinkers); Poultry meat (sampled from product ready to consumption, in nature or processed). All strains were submitted to serovar confirmation by molecular assay using specific primers [24] (S1 File).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

All 62 SH strains were submitted to the antimicrobial susceptibility using the disk diffusion test [25] and breakpoints used according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [26]. The antimicrobials used are shown in S2 Table. Strains which presented resistance to three or more antimicrobial drug class used were considered MDR.

β-lactam resistance genes

DNA extraction

All 62 SH strains were subjected to DNA extraction using the PureLink ™ Genomic DNA Kit (K182001, Invitrogen—Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) following manufacturer's recommendations. The extracted DNA quantity was evaluated by spectrophotometer, DeNovix DS-11 + (DeNovix Inc., Delaware, USA), in nanogram per microliter (ng/μL).

Resistance genes

The presence of β-lactam resistance genes was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers [27] (S3 Table). The master mix concentrations and amplification conditions used in this study are described in S4 and S5 Tables. The fragments were visualized from 5 μL of the amplicons along with 1 μL of Loading Dye buffer (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) in the 1.5% agarose gel (Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, USA) stained with SyBr Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). It was submitted to electrophoretic run under the 4V / cm conditions of the well (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) for 45 minutes. Then, the gel was subjected to UV light in a Gel Doc EZ Gel Documentation System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)

PFGE was performed using XbaI (Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, USA) protocol [28]. Then, dendrogram was constructed using the Bionumerics version 7.1 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) applying the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean method using the Dice coefficient with 1% tolerance and 0.5% of optimization.

Results and discussion

According to the phenotypic susceptibility test, the prevalence of resistance was observed for streptomycin (S; 98.3%), nalidixic acid (NAL; 80.6%), tetracycline (T; 69.3%), cefotaxime (CTX; 59.7%), ampicillin (AMP; 58.1%) amoxicillin (AMX; 58.1%), cefoxitin (FOX; 56.4%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC; 56,4%) and ceftiofur (CEF; 54.8%). In contrast, the lowest prevalence of resistance was observed for chloramphenicol (C; 1.6%) and imipenem (IMP; 4.8%). No resistance was observed against norfloxacin (NOR), amikacin (AK), gentamicin (GM) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) (Table 1).
Table 1

Antimicrobial resistance frequency in phenotypic test of 62 Salmonella Heidelberg strains collected from poultry, poultry meat and poultry farms.

AntimicrobialsFrequency of resistance
PoultryPoultry meatPoultry farmsTotal (%)
Ciprofloxacin0/100/201/321.6% (1/62)
Nalidixic acid9/1020/2021/3280.6% (50/62)
Enrofloxacin2/104/2012/3229.1% (18/62)
Norfloxacin0/100/200/320
Amikacin0/100/200/320
Kanamycin1/100/207/3212.9% (8/62)
Streptomycin10/1019/2032/3298.3% (61/62)
Gentamicin0/100/200/320
Ampicilin8/1017/2011/3258.1% (36/62)
Amoxilin8/1017/2011/3258.1% (36/62)
Imipenem0/100/203/324.8% (3/62)
Ceftiofur8/1015/2011/3254.8% (34/62)
Cefotaxime8/1017/2012/3259.7% (37/62)
Cefoxitin6/1017/2012/3256.4% (35/62)
Amoxilin-clavulanate8/1017/2010/3256.4% (35/62)
Nitrofurantoin10/109/208/3243.5% (27/62)
Chloramphenicol--1/321.6% (1/62)
Tetracycline9/1020/2014/3269.3% (43/62)
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim0/100/200/320

Quinolones and fluoroquinolones [Ciprofloxacin, Nalidixic acid, Enrofloxacin, Norfloxacin]; Aminoglycosides [Amikacin, Kanamycin, Streptomycin, Gentamicin]; β-lactam [Penicillins (Ampicilin, Amoxilin), Carbapenems (Imipenem), Cephalosporins (Ceftiofur, Cefotaxime, Cefoxitin)]; β-lactam / β-lactamase inhibitor combinations [Amoxilin-clavulanate]; Nitrofurans [Nitrofurantoin]; Phenicols [Chloramphenicol]; Tetracyclines [Tetracycline]; Sulfonamide / Folate pathway inhinitors [Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim]

Quinolones and fluoroquinolones [Ciprofloxacin, Nalidixic acid, Enrofloxacin, Norfloxacin]; Aminoglycosides [Amikacin, Kanamycin, Streptomycin, Gentamicin]; β-lactam [Penicillins (Ampicilin, Amoxilin), Carbapenems (Imipenem), Cephalosporins (Ceftiofur, Cefotaxime, Cefoxitin)]; β-lactam / β-lactamase inhibitor combinations [Amoxilin-clavulanate]; Nitrofurans [Nitrofurantoin]; Phenicols [Chloramphenicol]; Tetracyclines [Tetracycline]; Sulfonamide / Folate pathway inhinitors [Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim] Based on antimicrobial susceptibility test, 41/62 (66,2%) of SH strains were resistant to three or more drug class and identified as MDR; nineteen (30.6%) of them resistant to five antimicrobial classes of the seven used in this work. These results reveled 31 different resistant profile from all SH, withal the most frequent pattern identified were NalFoxCefCtxAmcTNitAmxAmpS (12.1%) and NalFoxCefCtxAmcTAmxAmpS (11.3%) (S1 Table). In this study, Salmonella Heidelberg showed resistance to some antimicrobials, as C, Nit and T, that are prohibited in Brazil on animal production since early 2000s [29,30]. However, the tetracycline is a commonly antimicrobial used in animals of production. Previous studies have been reported resistance to T after it was used as a growth promoter or performance enhancers in food animals [11,31]. The selective pressure by antimicrobial presence on environment favors the exponential resistance spread on gut, oral cavity and feces [32]. It is noteworthy that the prevalence of resistance among the 62 SH in this study was highest to NAL, S and β-lactams class drugs, including cephalosporin group ones. These results lead to a public health concern, since extended-spectrum cephalosporin (ESC) is indicated as first-line antibiotics for the gastrointestinal infections treatment caused by Salmonella spp. in humans [33]. In the present work, we found high occurrence of strains resistant to all β-lactam subclass used, including those combined to β-lactamase inhibitor (AMC). Penicillin associated to adjuvants has been used as alternative to β-lactam resistant bacteria in human infections caused both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species [15]. Furthermore, the drugs inhibitors, as clavulanic acid, acts under penicillinases and cephalosporinases, being used to distinguish ESBL-producing from AmpC-producing isolates [32,34]. In our results, all FOX resistant samples also presented resistance to AMC, suggesting that they are AmpC-producing SH and then confirmed by PCR. Over to fifty percent of studied SH shown cephalosporin-resistance. These results are in accordance with previous works which reported cephalosporin-resistance in Salmonella from food-producing animals and poultry meat, since early 2000s [9,35,36]. Third-generation cephalosporin, as ceftiofur, have been frequently used in day-old chicks together with Marek’s vaccine [16], and it is related to short-term antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacteriaceae [13,14]. Despite that CEF is not a common cephalosporin used in human medicine, previous studies have shown a strict relationship between it and CTX resistance in Enterobacteriaceae [13,37]. We found complete agreement in that CEF and CTX resistance. This result suggests that ceftiofur could be used to access cefotaxime resistance by study model in poultry origin bacteria. The frequency of ESBL, ampC and Carbapenemase genes in Salmonella Heidelberg from poultry origins are shown in Table 2. Extended spectrum β-lactamase genes were identified in seven of 62 SH strains studied: blaCTX-M, 3.22% (2/62); blaSHV, 4.83% (3/62); blaTEM-1, 3.22% (2/62). ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae harboring these genes are frequently found from animal and human origin [5,13,38,39]. None of other studied ESBL genes–blaPSE and blaOXA-2 –were found in this study. The low prevalence of these determinants has been reported from animal hosts bacteria, whereas from humans, these isolates are often found [19,40].
Table 2

Resistance genes frequency of 62 Salmonella Heidelberg strains collected from poultry, poultry meat and poultry farms.

GenePoultryPoultry meatPoultry farmsTotal (%)
ESBLblaCTX-M0/101/201/322 (3.22)
blaSHV0/101/202/323 (4.83)
blaTEM-11/100/201/322 (3.22)
AmpCblaCMY-28/1017/2013/3238 (62.3)
CarbapenemaseblaNDM0/100/200/320
blaOXA-480/100/200/320
Differently from ESBL determinants, the blaCMY-2 gene was found in 62.3% (38/62) of SH strains (Table 2). The CMY-2 is related to resistance with second generation cephalosporins and penicillins through the production of β-lactamase AmpC [41] and it has been reported as major determinant of CEF resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from poultry source [42-44]. No others plasmid-mediated ampC genes investigated in our study were found in SH strains, including blaFOX and blaCMY-1. Usually, AmpC β-lactamase can occur as both a plasmid-mediated gene and hyperproduction of chromosomal ampC. The last mechanisms has instead of have been reported as the major one from animal origin bacteria [45,46], and it be related to mutations in enzyme regulatory [45]. Although chromosomal AmpC overproduction is the common resistance mechanism in AmpC-producing bacteria, in our results all CEF resistant SH shown plasmid-mediated cephamycinase. The increase of plasmid-mediated blaCMY-2 is associated with the CEF use in animal treatment infections, leading a new selective pressure to bacteria [5,16,35,47,48]. In the present study 36 strains displayed resistant to AMC, all of them presenting blaCMY-2 gene. The β-lactamase inhibitors use associated with β-lactams has confirmed the resistance caused by AmpC production, since the clavulanate acid (inhibitor) acts under the ESBL-producing strains [15] however, not under the AmpC-producing strains. No carbapenemase coding genes were found, despite three different SH presented resistance against IMP (Table 2). The blaNDM and blaOXA-48 gene-determinants, tested in this study, have been found in Salmonella enterica from different regions of the world [49-52]. Though no gene was found, we assume that IMP resistance in SH strains studied here, could harbor other carbapenemase group like those belonging the class A, usually found in others Enterobacteriaceae (e.g. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli) [53].

Genotypic relatedness by PFGE

According to PFGE analysis carried from restriction using XbaI, studied SH strains were clustered in ten major groups as shown in Fig 1. Fifty-eight PFGE patterns were found among 62 Salmonella Heidelberg indicating a large diversity of these serovar from poultry sources. Studies in the USA have shown large diversity between Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg from food-producing animals [54]. Despite ours results shown high heterogeneity between isolates from different poultry sources (poultry, poultry meat and poultry farm), study with Heidelberg serovar from turkey-associated sources reveled extensive similarity between those isolates [55].
Fig 1

PFGE dendrogram of Salmonella Heidelberg isolates collected from poultry, poultry meat and poultry farms.

Compering PFGE with antimicrobial resistance results (phenotype and genotype ones), no relatedness between PFGE and resistance profiles. We assumed that these findings were due genetic diversity among SH isolates from poultry sources. Similarly, Lynne et al found large genetic diversity work with this serovar from cattle and swine sources [54].

Conclusions

Our results showed high resistance characterized by both phenotypes and genotypes being related to AmpC. Strains resistant to a larger number of antimicrobials were also grouped into ten major clusters by PFGE. The present study reinforces that Salmonella Heidelberg from poultry origin is a serious hazard to public health that can act as foodborne pathogen. Therefore, measures to reduce antimicrobial resistance and to control Salmonella Heidelberg should be seriously addressed by the Brazilian poultry sector.

Information of the Salmonella Heidelberg strains used, including the antimicrobial susceptibility profile.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

Class, concentrations and abbreviations of each antimicrobial drug used to disk diffusion test in this study.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Primers sequences to evaluate the presence or absence of the β-lactamase resistance gene.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

PCR master mix of β-lactam resistance genes.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

Amplification conditions of β-lactam resistance genes.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

Master mix and PCR conditions to SH identification.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  47 in total

1.  International spread of bla(CMY-2)-mediated cephalosporin resistance in a multiresistant Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg isolate stemming from the importation of a boar by Denmark from Canada.

Authors:  Frank M Aarestrup; Henrik Hasman; Inger Olsen; Gitte Sørensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Characteristics of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Salmonella from retail chicken meat produced by integrated broiler operations.

Authors:  Hye Young Jeon; Kwang Won Seo; Yeong Bin Kim; Dong Kyu Kim; Shin Woo Kim; Young Ju Lee
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of third-generation-cephalosporin administration in hatcheries on fecal Escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance in broilers and layers.

Authors:  Sandrine Baron; Eric Jouy; Emeline Larvor; Florent Eono; Stéphanie Bougeard; Isabelle Kempf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  The use of antimicrobial agents in broiler chickens.

Authors:  M F Landoni; G Albarellos
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  Antibiotic Adjuvants: Rescuing Antibiotics from Resistance: (Trends in Microbiology 24, 862-871; October 17, 2016).

Authors:  Gerard D Wright
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Antimicrobial resistance genes in multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica isolated from animals, retail meats, and humans in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  LaShanda M Glenn; Rebecca L Lindsey; Jason P Folster; Gary Pecic; Patrick Boerlin; Mathew W Gilmour; Heather Harbottle; Shaohua Zhao; Patrick F McDermott; Paula J Fedorka-Cray; Jonathan G Frye
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.431

7.  Acquired antibiotic resistance genes: an overview.

Authors:  Angela H A M van Hoek; Dik Mevius; Beatriz Guerra; Peter Mullany; Adam Paul Roberts; Henk J M Aarts
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Prevalence and clonal relationship of ESBL-producing Salmonella strains from humans and poultry in northeastern Algeria.

Authors:  Samia Djeffal; Sofiane Bakour; Bakir Mamache; Rachid Elgroud; Amir Agabou; Selma Chabou; Sana Hireche; Omar Bouaziz; Kheira Rahal; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg from chicken meat and humans, Canada.

Authors:  Lucie Dutil; Rebecca Irwin; Rita Finley; Lai King Ng; Brent Avery; Patrick Boerlin; Anne Marie Bourgault; Linda Cole; Danielle Daignault; Andrea Desruisseau; Walter Demczuk; Linda Hoang; Greg B Horsman; Johanne Ismail; Frances Jamieson; Anne Maki; Ana Pacagnella; Dylan R Pillai
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg Strains, the Netherlands(1).

Authors:  Apostolos Liakopoulos; Yvon Geurts; Cindy M Dierikx; Michael S M Brouwer; Arie Kant; Ben Wit; Raymond Heymans; Wilfrid van Pelt; Dik J Mevius
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  9 in total

1.  Recent Evolution and Genomic Profile of Salmonella enterica Serovar Heidelberg Isolates from Poultry Flocks in Brazil.

Authors:  Diéssy Kipper; Renato H Orsi; Laura M Carroll; Andrea K Mascitti; André F Streck; André S K Fonseca; Nilo Ikuta; Eduardo C Tondo; Martin Wiedmann; Vagner R Lunge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Dynamics of Salmonella enterica and antimicrobial resistance in the Brazilian poultry industry and global impacts on public health.

Authors:  Nabil-Fareed Alikhan; Luisa Zanolli Moreno; Luis Ricardo Castellanos; Marie Anne Chattaway; Jim McLauchlin; Martin Lodge; Justin O'Grady; Roxana Zamudio; Emma Doughty; Liljana Petrovska; Marcos Paulo Vieira Cunha; Terezinha Knöbl; Andrea Micke Moreno; Alison E Mather
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.020

3.  Molecular genotyping reveals inter-regional relatedness among antimicrobial resistant Salmonella Minnesota strains isolated from poultry farm and humans, Brazil.

Authors:  João Paulo Fernandes Ferreira Moreira; Daniel Farias Marinho do Monte; Camila de Aguiar Lima; Celso José Bruno de Oliveira; Nelson Rodrigo da Silva Martins; Angelo Berchieri Junior; Oliveiro Caetano de Freitas Neto
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 4.  Emergence, Dissemination and Antimicrobial Resistance of the Main Poultry-Associated Salmonella Serovars in Brazil.

Authors:  Diéssy Kipper; Andréa Karoline Mascitti; Silvia De Carli; Andressa Matos Carneiro; André Felipe Streck; André Salvador Kazantzi Fonseca; Nilo Ikuta; Vagner Ricardo Lunge
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 5.  Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria-A Review.

Authors:  Renata Urban-Chmiel; Agnieszka Marek; Dagmara Stępień-Pyśniak; Kinga Wieczorek; Marta Dec; Anna Nowaczek; Jacek Osek
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09

6.  Molecular Characterization and Survive Abilities of Salmonella Heidelberg Strains of Poultry Origin in Brazil.

Authors:  Roberta T Melo; Newton N Galvão; Micaela Guidotti-Takeuchi; Phelipe A B M Peres; Belchiolina B Fonseca; Rodrigo Profeta; Vasco A C Azevedo; Guilherme P Monteiro; Bertram Brenig; Daise A Rossi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Persistent Asymptomatic Human Infections by Salmonella enterica Serovar Newport in China.

Authors:  Narayan Paudyal; Hang Pan; Beibei Wu; Xiao Zhou; Xin Zhou; Wenqing Chai; Qingqing Wu; Shuning Li; Fang Li; Guimin Gu; Haoqiu Wang; Qinghua Hu; Xuebin Xu; Yan Li; Min Yue
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.389

8.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Salmonella Isolated from Food Workers and Chicken Products in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sasaki; Hiromi Kakizawa; Youichi Baba; Takeshi Ito; Yukari Haremaki; Masaru Yonemichi; Tetsuya Ikeda; Makoto Kuroda; Kenji Ohya; Yukiko Hara-Kudo; Tetsuo Asai; Hiroshi Asakura
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16

9.  Role played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chain.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Ana Allende; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Marianne Chemaly; Robert Davies; Alessandra De Cesare; Lieve Herman; Friederike Hilbert; Roland Lindqvist; Maarten Nauta; Giuseppe Ru; Marion Simmons; Panagiotis Skandamis; Elisabetta Suffredini; Héctor Argüello; Thomas Berendonk; Lina Maria Cavaco; William Gaze; Heike Schmitt; Ed Topp; Beatriz Guerra; Ernesto Liébana; Pietro Stella; Luisa Peixe
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.