| Literature DB >> 32231098 |
Jeny Hinojosa-Gómez1, César San Martín-Hernández2, José B Heredia1, Josefina León-Félix1, Tomás Osuna-Enciso1, María D Muy-Rangel1.
Abstract
Abiotic factors can alter the chemical profile of crops and the number of compounds they contain. In this study, the anthocyanin and anthocyanidin contents, determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC-MS/MS), and the colour attributes of the calyces of three cultivars of Hibiscus sabdariffa subjected to three water stress regimes during the stage of physiological maturity were investigated. The total anthocyanin content in calyx increased relative to the control content under a 65% moisture irrigation regime. Among the cultivars, UAN16-2 showed the greatest increases in the contents of cyanidin, delphinidin 3-O-glucoside, cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, and cyanidin 3-O-sambubioside. The content of cyanidin 3-O-sambubioside showed the greatest increase, increasing by 55% relative to the control level. The contents of these compounds are correlated with colour attributes such as luminosity. Water stress under the 33% moisture condition during plant development led to decreased anthocyanin contents in all of the roselle cultivars.Entities:
Keywords: Hibiscus sabdariffa; UPLC-MS/MS analysis; anthocyanins; colour; drought stress; greenhouse
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32231098 PMCID: PMC7180819 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Compounds identified in H. sabdariffa extracts. RT, retention time.
| RT (min) | Analyte | Formula | Exact Mass | Scan Mode | Fragments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.76 | Cyanidin | C15H11O6+ | 287.05 | [M]+ | 287.05, 288.05 |
| 7.39 | Delphinidin | C15H11O7 | 303.05 | [M]+ | 207.13, 262.85, 303.05 |
| 6.74 | Cyanidin 3- | C21H21O11+ | 449.1 | [M]+ | 287.05, 288.05, 449.1 |
| 6.75 | Cyanidin 3-sambubioside | C26H29O15+ | 580.14 | [M + H]+ | 287.05, 581.14, 582.15 |
| 6.20 | Delphinidin 3- | C21H21O12+ | 465.1 | [M]+ | 303.05, 304.05, 465.10 |
| 6.10 | Delphinidin 3-sambubioside | C26H29O16+ | 596.14 | [M + H]+ | 303.05, 597.14, 598.14 |
Figure 1Chromatograms of anthocyanins and anthocyanidins determined in roselle calyx extracts.
Figure 2Mass spectra with a collision energy of 10 V for the identification of anthocyanins and anthocyanidins.
Anthocyanins and anthocyanidins (mg EC3G 100 g−1 db) of the different genotypes of roselle calyces at three irrigation regimes of IR1, IR2, and IR3 (humidity content of 100%, 65%, and 33%, respectively) (mean ± SD).
| Cultivar/ Regimen | Cyanidin | Delphinidin | Cyanidin 3- | Cyanidin 3-Sambubioside | Delphinidin 3- | Delphinidin 3-Sambubioside | Total Anthocyanins | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAN16-2 | IR1 | 40.4 ± 9.5 de | 15.9 ± 2.9ef | 8.6 ± 1.8de | 184.3 ±13.2de | 20.6 ± 1.7cd | 285.3 ± 9.9f | 555.3 ± 33.2e |
| IR2 | 71.9 ± 11 bc | 28.9 ± 2.7d | 16.5 ± 0.1bc | 405 ± 11.1b | 39.8 ± 4.8a | 504.2 ±15cd | 1066.3 ± 44.5c | |
| IR3 | 21.6 ± 2.4e | 4.3 ± 0.8f | 6.3 ± 1.5e | 98.6 ± 3.7f | 12.2 ± 1.2d | 134.1 ± 13.1g | 277.2 ± 22.7f | |
| 4Q4 | IR1 | 35.9 ± 6.8de | 11.3 ± 7.5c | 4.6 ± 0.4e | 148.4 ± 13.1e | 23.2 ± 2.9c | 325.3 ± 8.8ef | 547.2 ± 7.5e |
| IR2 | 55.9 ± 4cd | 23.1 ± 2.4ef | 12.1 ± 2cd | 280.3 ± 11c | 34.9 ± 3.2ab | 532.6 ± 14.9c | 938.9 ± 7d | |
| IR3 | 42.4 ± 2.5de | 8.4 ± 1.1f | 7.6 ± 1de | 211.8 ± 24.2d | 23.2 ± 2.3c | 328.1 ± 7.1e | 621.5 ± 36e | |
| Cruza Negra | IR1 | 76.3 ± 2.4bc | 78.9 ± 1.5b | 17.3 ± 1.7b | 507.7 ± 1.4a | 38.1 ± 2.6 ab | 615.9 ± 8.3b | 1350.1 ± 10.1b |
| IR2 | 104.3 ± 2.4a | 95.4 ± 1.5a | 23.2 ± 1.7a | 540 ± 1.4a | 44 ± 2.6a | 853.4 ± 8.3a | 1660.3 ± 1.1a | |
| IR3 | 92.1 ± 1.2bc | 45.4 ± 7.5c | 9.1 ± 1.3de | 373.5 ± 5.1b | 27.4 ± 1.4bc | 488.1 ± 7.4d | 1019.8 ± 6.4cd | |
In each column, different letters mean significant differences between the samples according to the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3Color parameters and calyx appearance of different roselle genotypes in three irrigation regimes (IR1 = 100%, IR2 = 65%, and IR3 = 33% humidity). Means with different letters within columns and rows per response variable show significant differences according to the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4Weekly average of relative humidity (RH) and maximum (MAXT) and minimum temperatures (MINT) during the cultivation of roselle.
Physicochemical profile of the substrate.
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| pH | 6.44 |
| Electrical conductivity (dS m−1) | 1.14 |
| Sodium (mg kg−1) | 528.99 |
| Potassium (mg kg−1) | 801.28 |
| Calcium (mg kg−1) | 5025.65 |
| Magnesium (mg kg-1) | 5025.65 |
| Iron (mg kg−1) | 990.09 |
| Manganese (mg kg−1) | 48.86 |
| Zinc (mg kg−1) | 6.7 |
| Copper (mg kg-1) | 2.68 |
| Cationic exchange capacity | 37.58 |
| Phosphorus (mg kg−1) | 89.95 |
| Nitrates (mg kg−1) | 104.69 |
Figure 5Water retention curve of the substrate.
Applied ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) gradient parameters for the elution of anthocyanins.
| Time (min) | Solvent A (%) | Solvent B (%) | Flow rate (μL/min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100 | 0 | 400 |
| 5 | 91 | 9 | 400 |
| 7 | 85 | 15 | 400 |
| 8 | 0 | 100 | 400 |
| 10 | 0 | 100 | 400 |
| 10.1 | 100 | 0 | 400 |
| 13 | 100 | 0 | 400 |