| Literature DB >> 32231049 |
Lan Li1, Gang Li2, Junqi Chen2.
Abstract
Based on social exchange, rational choice, and perceptual choice theory, this paper examines the influence of professional competence, personal relationship, and their interaction on repeated purchase intention in the context of rural agricultural marketing. Adopting the survey method and hierarchical regression analysis, this study tested the hypotheses with a data set of 578 farmers from China, and assessed the robustness of the results by structural equation modelling. The results show that both personal relationship and professional competence have a significantly positive impact on repeated purchase intention while the interaction between the two has a significant negative effect on repeated purchase intention. The results expose the struggle farmers experience in choosing between emotional and rational thinking when making purchasing decisions in the urbanization and industrialization process of a rural area. The results also enrich the research on the marketing of agricultural resources and have important implications to agricultural retailers.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural marketing; personal relationship; professional competence; repeated purchase intention
Year: 2020 PMID: 32231049 PMCID: PMC7177999 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Theoretical model.
Variables and scales.
| Scales | Factor Loadings |
|---|---|
|
| |
| When local farmers interact with sales staff at agricultural retail stores, think the other party is a friend of himself | 0.725 |
| Local farmers are also willing to help each other on non-work issues when dealing with sales staff at agricultural retail stores | 0.712 |
| Local farmers often talk about personal issues when dealing with sales staff in agricultural retail stores | 0.627 |
| When local farmers interact with the sales staff of agricultural retail stores, they will keep in touch with each other even after the current sale and purchase relationship ends. | 0.736 |
| Local farmers think of each other as a member of inner circle of people when dealing with sales staff at agricultural retail stores | 0.688 |
|
| |
| Agricultural salesman is knowledgeable in his field | 0.830 |
| Agricultural salespersons know the agricultural market very well | 0.850 |
| Agricultural sales staff can provide some solutions to help us improve agricultural production | 0.696 |
| Agricultural sales staff can recommend alternative products that meet the requirements (e.g., new agricultural products such as pesticides, fertilizers, seeds, etc.) | 0.653 |
|
| |
| If the local farmer no longer chooses the agricultural retail store that he frequents, but switches to another one, he can easily make up for the loss of income (R) | 0.748 |
| For local farmers, it is easy to find an alternative agricultural retail store (R) | 0.900 |
| If local farmers want, it can be quite easy to switch to another agricultural retail store (R) | 0.829 |
|
| |
| In the next three years, I will buy agricultural products (agrochemicals, seeds, fertilizers) from the same agricultural retail stores. | 0.935 |
| Next year I will buy agricultural products (agrochemicals, seeds, fertilizers) from the agricultural retail stores I visit often | 0.935 |
|
| |
| Local farmers will have more business dealings with agricultural retail stores in the future | 0.763 |
| Local farmers buy new agricultural products (pesticides, fertilizers, seeds) or new services from the same agricultural retail stores | 0.881 |
| Local farmers will buy more agricultural products (pesticides, fertilizers, seeds) or services from the same agricultural retail stores | 0.873 |
Note: CR, composite reliability; AVE, average variance extracted.
Sample profile (%).
|
| |
| Male | 66.78 |
| Female | 33.22 |
|
| |
| <10 years | 23.9 |
| 10–30 years | 38 |
| 30 years < | 38.1 |
|
| |
| Less literacy | 10.38 |
| Elementary school | 31.66 |
| Junior high school | 45.67 |
| High school/technical school | 11.07 |
| Diploma and above | 1.21 |
|
| |
| 0–25% | 50.9 |
| 26–50% | 27.8 |
| 51–100% | 21.3 |
|
| |
| <36 | 10.38 |
| 37–46 | 26.12 |
| 47–54 | 27.85 |
| 55–65 | 23.7 |
|
| |
| <10,000 | 25.78 |
| 10,000–30,000 | 47.58 |
| 30,000–60,000 | 19.55 |
| 60,000–90,000 | 3.8 |
| >90,000 | 3.29 |
Correlation coefficient between statistical description and each research variable.
| Variables | Means | S.D. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 RPI | 5.641 | 0.996 | (0.841) | |||||
| 2 PR | 5.012 | 1.088 | 0.395 ** | (0.712) | ||||
| 3 PC | 5.494 | 1.009 | 0.421 ** | 0.316 ** | (0.762) | |||
| 4 IR | 3.364 | 1.537 | −0.123 ** | −0.080 | −0.167 ** | (0.828) | ||
| 5 EI | 5.488 | 1.232 | 0.369 ** | 0.216 ** | 0.225 ** | −0.063 | (0.935) | |
Note: RPI: Repeated purchase intention; PR: Personal relationship; PC: Professional competence; IR: Irreplaceability of retailers; EI: Expected interaction. N = 578; The value in parentheses on the diagonal is the square root of the average variation extraction (AVE). The off-diagonal is the correlation coefficient of each variable, ** p < 0.01.
Hierarchical regression.
| Independent Variables | Repeated Purchase Intention | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mold 1 | Mold 2 | Mold 3 | Mold 4 | Mold 5 | Mold 6 | |
| IR | −0.100 ** | −0.81 ** | −0.047 | −0.043 | −0.089 ** | −0.036 |
| EI | 0.293 *** | 0.292 *** | 0.287 *** | 0.246 *** | 0.353 *** | 0.244 *** |
| PR | 0.325 *** | 0.249 *** | 0.254 *** | |||
| PC | 0.348 *** | 0.281 *** | 0.265 *** | |||
| PR × PC | −0.130 ** | −0.088 ** | ||||
| R | 0.496 | 0.572 | 0.508 | 0.560 | 0.403 | 0.567 |
| R2 | 0.246 | 0.327 | 0.258 | 0.314 | 0.162 | 0.321 |
| ΔR2 | 0.242 | 0.322 | 0.255 | 0.309 | 0.158 | 0.315 |
| F | 49.198 | 62.145 | 66.663 | 65.218 | 36.878 | 53.904 |
Note: RPI: Repeated purchase intention; PR: Personal relationship; PC: Professional competence; IR: Irreplaceability of retailers; EI: Expected interaction. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05.
Figure 2The results of structural equation modeling. Note: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05.