| Literature DB >> 32230870 |
Lin Lin1,2, You Shi1, Jinfu Chen1,2, Sher Ali1.
Abstract
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) consist of multiple sensor nodes, each of which has the ability to collect, receive and send data. However, irregular data sources can lead to severe network congestion. To solve this problem, the Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller is introduced into the congestion control mechanism to control the queue length of messages in nodes. By running the PID algorithm on cluster head nodes, the effective collection of sensor data is realized. In addition, a fuzzy control algorithm is proposed to solve the problems of slow parameter optimization, limited adaptive ability and poor optimization precision of traditional PID controller. However, the parameter selection of the fuzzy control algorithm relies too much on expert experience and has certain limitations. Therefore, this manuscript proposes the Cuckoo Fuzzy-PID Controller (CFPID), whose core idea is to apply the cuckoo search algorithm to optimize the fuzzy PID controller's quantization factor and PID parameter increment. Simulation results show that in comparison with the existing methods, the instantaneous queue length and real-time packet loss rate of CFPID are better.Entities:
Keywords: congestion control; cuckoo search; proportional integral derivative; wireless sensor networks
Year: 2020 PMID: 32230870 PMCID: PMC7181079 DOI: 10.3390/s20071862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1TCP Network Model.
Figure 2Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control system schematic diagram.
Figure 3Fuzzy Proportional Integral Derivative (FPID) controller schematic diagram.
Figure 4Membership function curve of input and output variables.
Table of FPID mode and rule.
|
| ec | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NB | NM | NS | Z | PS | PM | PB | ||
|
|
| PB/NB/PS | PB/NB/NS | PM/NM/NB | PM/NM/NB | PS/NS/NB | Z/Z/NM | Z/Z/PS |
|
| PB/NB/PS | PB/NB/NS | PM/NM/NB | PS/NS/NM | PS/NS/NM | Z/Z/NS | NS/Z/Z | |
|
| PM/NB/Z | PM/NM/NS | PM/NS/NM | PS/NS/NM | Z/Z/NS | NS/PS/NS | NS/PS/Z | |
|
| PM/NM/Z | PM/NM/NS | PS/NS/NS | Z/Z/NS | NS/PS/NS | NM/PM/NS | NM/PM/Z | |
|
| PS/NM/Z | PS/NS/Z | Z/Z/Z | NS/PS/Z | NS/PS/Z | NM/PM/Z | NM/PB/Z | |
|
| PS/Z/PB | Z/Z/PS | NS/PS/PS | NM/PS/PS | NM/PM/Z | NM/PB/PS | NB/PB/PB | |
|
| Z/Z/PB | Z/Z/PM | NM/PS/PM | NM/PM/PM | NM/PM/PS | NB/PB/PS | NB/PB/PB | |
Figure 5CFPID controller model.
Table of simulation parameters.
| Simulation Parameter | Prescribed Value |
|---|---|
| Simulated area | 100*100 |
| Number of nodes | 100/200 |
| Simulation time | 50 |
| Expected Queue length | 100 |
Figure 6One-hundred instantaneous queue length curves for nodes.
Figure 7Two-hundred instantaneous queue length curves at node.
Figure 8One-hundred node-time packet loss rate curves.
Figure 9Two-hundred node-time packet loss rate curve.
Figure 10Packet loss rate curve.
Figure 11Throughput comparison.
Figure 12Running time comparison.