| Literature DB >> 32230778 |
Limin Li1, Zhaoyang Guo2, Longfei Ran3, Jiewen Zhang3.
Abstract
The low-temperature cracking performance of asphalt is considered one of the main deteriorations in asphalt pavements. However, there have been few studies on the low-temperature cracking performance of asphalt under heat and light together. Hence, the ductility test, bending beam rheometer (BBR) test, and asphalt composition analysis test are combined to investigate the low-temperature cracking performance under heat and light together based on the climatic conditions of China. The styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer (SBS)-modified asphalt binders were prepared with different modifier types and base asphalt in this research. The results show that the low-temperature cracking resistance of asphalt reduces under heat and light together. It is obviously reduced at the early stage, and it becomes worse with the increase of the aging time, temperature, and ultraviolet (UV) intensity. The asphalt composition has a significant impact on its low-temperature cracking performance, and the SBS modifier can improve the low-temperature cracking resistance of asphalt. The rational selection of base asphalt and modifier can improve the low-temperature cracking performance of asphalt. Under heat and light together, whether base asphalt or modified asphalt, the change trends of their ductility and component content are similar. Therefore, to improve the anti-cracking ability of the asphalt pavement, it is suggested to use the ductility of asphalt aged by heat and light together for 15 days as the evaluation index of the low-temperature cracking performance of asphalt, and asphalt should be selected according to the temperature and UV intensity of the asphalt pavement use area.Entities:
Keywords: aging; asphalt; heat and light together; low-temperature cracking performance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32230778 PMCID: PMC7178169 DOI: 10.3390/ma13071541
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Properties of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) modifier.
| Type | Elongation at Break (%) | Character | Permanent Set (%) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Modulus at 300% Elongation (MPa) | Block Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501s modifier | ≥800 | White floc | ≤42 | ≥14.2 | ≥2.3 | 31/69 |
| 4402 modifier | ≥700 | White strip | ≤40 | ≥14.0 | ≥2.0 | 30/70 |
Properties of base asphalt.
| Properties | Criteria | SK-70 | ZH-70 | Methods | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ductility at 10 °C (cm) | ≥20 | 45 | 26.7 | T0604-2011 [ | |
| Viscosity at 135 °C (Pa.s) | ≤3.0 | 0.554 | 0.632 | T0625-2011 [ | |
| Rutting factor (kPa) | ≥1.0 | 1.91 | 1.20 | AASHTOT315 | |
| Penetration degree at 25 °C (0.1 mm) | 60~80 | 72 | 71 | T0605-2011 [ | |
| Penetration index | −1.5 to +1.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | T0604-2011 [ | |
| Softening point (°C) | ≥47 | 48.4 | 48.6 | T0606-2011 [ | |
| After the thin film oven test (TFOT) | Mass loss (%) | ±0.8 | −0.3 | −0.14 | T0609-2011 [ |
| Ductility at 10 °C (cm) | ≥6s | 16 | 26 | T0604-2011 [ | |
| Penetration degree ratio at 25 °C (%) | ≥61 | 80.3 | 73.6 | T0605-2011 [ | |
Properties of SBS-modified asphalt.
| Properties | Criteria | Linear-Modified Asphalt | Branched-Modified Asphalt | Methods | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZH-70 | SK-70 | ZH-70 | SK-70 | ||||
| Ductility at 10 °C (cm) | ≥20 | 89 | 84 | 77 | 73 | T0604-2011 [ | |
| viscosity at 135 °C (Pa.s) | ≤3.0 | 1.625 | 1.400 | 1.853 | 1.769 | T0625-2011 [ | |
| Rutting factor (kPa) | ≥1.0 | 2.23 | 2.35 | 1.86 | 1.97 | AASHTOT315 | |
| Penetration degree at 25 °C (0.1 mm) | 30~60 | 42 | 49 | 48 | 51 | T0605-2011 [ | |
| Penetration index | ≥0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | T0604-2011 [ | |
| Softening point (°C) | ≥ 60 | 61.5 | 63.2 | 60.5 | 62 | T0606-2011 [ | |
| After the thin film oven test (TFOT) | Mass loss (%) | ± 0.8 | 0.6 | −0.3 | −0.2 | −0.2 | T0609-2011 [ |
| Ductility at 10 °C (cm) | ≥20 | 65 | 49 | 54 | 50 | T0604-2011 [ | |
| Penetration degree ratio at 25 °C (%) | ≥65 | 85.7 | 83.7 | 81.3 | 73.4 | T0605-2011 [ | |
Figure 1RG-80 asphalt aging test chamber.
Figure 2Asphalt sample.
Figure 3Relationship between ductility and aging time.
Figure 4Relationship between ductility and aging time for different UV intensity.
Figure 5Relationship between ductility and aging times for different temperatures.
Figure 6Ductility and aging times for different asphalts.
Figure 7Ductility retained rates and aging times for different asphalts.
Figure 8Creep stiffness change rate and aging time.
Figure 9Decrease rate of creep stiffness change rate and aging time.
Figure 10Stiffness modulus and aging time.
Figure 11Increase rate of stiffness modulus and aging time.
ZH-70 base asphalt composition.
| Aging Time | Saturates (%) | Aromatics (%) | Resins (%) | Asphaltenes (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 day | 13.35 | 49.28 | 28.32 | 9.05 |
| 5 days | 13.70 | 45.32 | 28.35 | 12.63 |
| 10 days | 13.65 | 44.91 | 28.64 | 12.80 |
| 15 days | 13.54 | 44.50 | 28.91 | 13.05 |
ZH-70 linear-modified asphalt composition.
| Aging Time | Saturates (%) | Aromatics (%) | Resins (%) | Asphaltenes (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 day | 12.67 | 45.31 | 26.97 | 15.05 |
| 5 days | 12.58 | 43.82 | 25.62 | 17.98 |
| 10 days | 12.61 | 43.54 | 25.50 | 18.35 |
| 15 days | 12.67 | 43.33 | 25.49 | 18.51 |
Figure 12Change rate of component content and aging time for ZH-70 base and modified asphalt.