| Literature DB >> 32230742 |
Ali Reza Sadeghi-Avalshahr1,2, Samira Nokhasteh1, Amir Mahdi Molavi1,3, Najmeh Mohammad-Pour4, Mohammad Sadeghi5.
Abstract
Electrospinning is a versatile technique for fabrication of made-on-purpose biomimetic scaffolds. In this study, optimized electrospun fibrous membranes were produced by simultaneous electrospinning of polycaprolactone (Entities:
Keywords: aminolysis; chitosan; collagen; electrospinning; grafting; wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32230742 PMCID: PMC7178267 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21072311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(a1–a9) SEM images showing the morphology of as-spun polycaprolactone (PCL) fibrous mats obtained from solutions at different concentrations and various machine parameters (V and D) (arrows show some beads have formed in microstructures).
Figure 2SEM images showing micrographs of co-electrospun PCL (20% w/v, V = 25 KV and D= 15 cm) with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (25% w/v, V = 25 KV and D= 15 cm) by various flow rates for PVP (ml/h): (a1–a3) before and (b1–b3) after immersion in water for 1h.
Figure 3SEM images of PCL fibrous mats after the soaking of simultaneous electrospun PCL/PVP samples in water for 24 h: (a,a1) before immersion; (b,b1) after immersion; (c) comparative histograms for pore diameter distribution before (PCL-PVP)and after (PCL) immersion in water.
Figure 4(a) SEM morphology of pristine PCL (control); (a1,a2) SEM morphology of aminolized PCL electrospun mats grafted with collagen/chitosan blend under different magnifications (arrow shows a typical uncoated part); (b,b1) comparative histograms of fiber diameter before (b) and after (b1) coating.
Figure 5The results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra analysis: (a) Collagen/chitosan-grafted PCL membranes; (b) detailed and quantitative analysis of elemental nitrogen (N1s).
Figure 6Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) analysis results: (a) nitrogen-related peaks; (b) 2D elemental mapping of nitrogen.
Figure 7(a1,a2) Stress–strain curves of (a1) pristine PCL membranes and (a2) collagen/chitosan-coated specimens; (b) Comparative histograms of ultimate stress and strain for pristine PCL (PCL-p1 to p5) and coated specimens (coated: p1–p5) (The comparison of data between the two groups (n = 5) using one-way ANOVA did not show any significant difference for p < 0.05.).
Figure 8SEM images showing 3T3 fibroblast cell line adhesion on (a,a1) the pristine PCL electrospun samples; (b,b1) collagen/chitosan grafted specimens (cultured for 3 days).
Figure 9SEM images showing HaCaT cell line adhesion on (a,a1) pristine PCL electrospun samples; (b,b1) collagen/chitosan grafted specimens (cultured for 3 days).
Figure 10Evaluating the viability of HDF cells on samples using MTT assay at different times (3, 5, 7 days) for pristine PCL fibrous mats and collagen/chitosan coated samples. Medium without scaffold was considered as the control. (One-way ANOVA analysis indicated a statistically significant difference between coated and uncoated specimens at day 5, * p < 0.05, n = 3.)
Figure 11Evaluation of cell ingress into PCL fibrous mats using HDF cells: (a,a1) after 24 h; (b,b1) after 7 days (after simultaneous electrospinning of PVP and PCL, PVP fibers were removed to increase the porosity of electrospun samples).
Results of antibacterial assay against two bacterium strains for A (pristine PCL) and B (coated scaffolds) in three iterations (the blank control for all samples was 1.5 × 106 CFU/mL).
| Microorganism | Contact time (h) | Sample | (CFU/mL) | Antibacterial Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | 1.5 × 106 | no antibacterial activity | |
| B | 1.5 × 106 | no antibacterial activity | ||
| 24 | A | 1.25 × 106 | 16.66 | |
| B | 4.7 × 105 | 68.66 | ||
| 1 | A | 1.5 × 106 | no antibacterial activity | |
| B | 1.5 × 106 | no antibacterial activity | ||
| 24 | A | 1.3 × 106 | 13.33 | |
| B | 9.5 × 105 | 36.66 |
Figure 12Histograms of antibacterial assay against two bacterium strains for pristine PCL and coated scaffolds after 1 h and 24 h. (One-way ANOVA analysis indicated a statistically significant difference between the antibacterial activity of coated samples in comparison with uncoated ones after 24 h, * p < 0.05, n = 3.)