| Literature DB >> 32230704 |
Arturas Kaklauskas1, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas1, Bjoern Schuller2, Natalija Lepkova1, Gintautas Dzemyda3, Jurate Sliogeriene1, Olga Kurasova3.
Abstract
The implementation of advertising for green housing usually involves consideration of individual differences among potential buyers, their desires for residential unit features as well as location impacts on a selected property. Much more rarely, there is consideration of the arousal and valence, affective behavior, emotional, and physiological states of possible buyers of green housing (AVABEPS) while they review the advertising. Yet, no integrated consideration of all these factors has been undertaken to date. The objective of this study was to consider, in an integrated manner, the AVABEPS, individual differences, and location impacts on property and desired residential unit features. During this research, the applications for the above data involved neuromarketing and multicriteria examination of video advertisements for diverse client segments by applying neuro decision tables. All of this can be performed by employing the method for planning and analyzing and by multiple criteria and customized video neuro-advertising green-housing variants (hereafter abbreviated as the ViNeRS Method), which the authors of this article have developed and present herein. The developed ViNeRS Method permits a compilation of as many as millions of alternative advertising variants. During the time of the ViNeRS project, we accumulated more than 350 million depersonalized AVABEPS data. The strong and average correlations determined in this research (over 35,000) and data examination by IBM SPSS tool support demonstrate the need to use AVABEPS in neuromarketing and neuro decision tables. The obtained dependencies constituted the basis for calculating and graphically submitting the ViNeRS circumplex model of affect, which the authors of this article developed. This model is similar to Russell's well-known earlier circumplex model of affect. Real case studies with their related contextual conditions presented in this manuscript show a practical application of the ViNeRS Method.Entities:
Keywords: COPRAS and ViNeRS Methods; green housing; multivariate design and multiple criteria analysis; neuro correlation matrix; neuro decision matrix; video neuro-advertising
Year: 2020 PMID: 32230704 PMCID: PMC7177231 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Quantitative and qualitative aspects of green and energy efficient marketing for analyzing the life cycle of a built environment.
Figure 2Main phases of the Video Neuroadvertising Recommender System (ViNeRS) Method.
A database snippet with AVABEPS variables of passers-by recorded at four intersections in Vilnius.
| Age Groups | Šventaragio and Pilies Sts. intersection | Šventaragio St. and Gedimino Pr. intersection | Kudirkos St. and Gedimino Pr. intersection | Santariškių and Baublio Sts. intersection | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | |
| 0–20 | 0.128 | 0.139 | 0.128 | 0.103 | 0.138 | 0.163 | 0.146 | 0.074 |
| 20–30 | 0.131 | 0.138 | 0.125 | 0.135 | 0.123 | 0.154 | 0.133 | 0.255 |
| 30–40 | 0.117 | 0.115 | 0.116 | 0.114 | 0.114 | 0.101 | 0.114 | 0.123 |
| 40–50 | 0.103 | 0.098 | 0.081 | 0.085 | 0.080 | 0.089 | 0.129 | 0.130 |
| 50–60 | 0.123 | 0.085 | 0.089 | 0.061 | 0.074 | 0.066 | 0.162 | 0.217 |
|
| ||||||||
| 0–20 | 79,071 | 76,537 | 81,791 | 56,000 | 69,628 | 63,667 | ||
| 20–30 | 78,779 | 76,931 | 75,002 | 83,914 | 72,351 | 70,953 | ||
| 30–40 | 75,923 | 80,393 | 80,669 | 72,113 | 76,228 | 72,756 | ||
| 40–50 | 77,147 | 74,872 | 87,742 | 78,144 | 86,521 | 82,111 | ||
| 50–60 | 69,539 | 70,819 | 97,927 | 84,312 | 82,000 | 83,600 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| 0–20 | 0.236 | 0.214 | 0.213 | 0.187 | 0.221 | 0.170 | 0.293 | 0.246 |
| 20–30 | 0.197 | 0.183 | 0.195 | 0.188 | 0.213 | 0.168 | 0.223 | 0.098 |
| 30–40 | 0.158 | 0.155 | 0.161 | 0.158 | 0.153 | 0.129 | 0.185 | 0.175 |
| 40–50 | 0.149 | 0.142 | 0.176 | 0.137 | 0.126 | 0.116 | 0.159 | 0.204 |
| 50–60 | 0.153 | 0.144 | 0.108 | 0.116 | 0.119 | 0.098 | 0.234 | 0.086 |
|
| ||||||||
| 0–20 | 0.092 | 0.116 | 0.086 | 0.118 | 0.087 | 0.116 | 0.132 | 0.116 |
| 20–30 | 0.086 | 0.122 | 0.079 | 0.109 | 0.103 | 0.127 | 0.135 | 0.074 |
| 30–40 | 0.091 | 0.119 | 0.093 | 0.111 | 0.089 | 0.109 | 0.134 | 0.157 |
| 40–50 | 0.094 | 0.123 | 0.086 | 0.119 | 0.094 | 0.106 | 0.084 | 0.126 |
| 50–60 | 0.092 | 0.129 | 0.070 | 0.135 | 0.071 | 0.104 | 0.195 | 0.106 |
|
| ||||||||
| 0–20 | −0.149 | −0.134 | −0.138 | −0.155 | −0.128 | −0.075 | −0.225 | −0.220 |
| 20–30 | −0.102 | −0.105 | −0.105 | −0.109 | −0.138 | −0.086 | −0.158 | 0.120 |
| 30–40 | −0.089 | −0.102 | −0.092 | −0.104 | −0.093 | −0.100 | −0.141 | −0.147 |
| 40–50 | −0.107 | −0.121 | −0.147 | −0.131 | −0.109 | −0.104 | −0.225 | −0.167 |
| 50–60 | −0.076 | −0.126 | −0.081 | −0.156 | −0.094 | −0.106 | −0.249 | 0.001 |
Figure 3The dependency between average daily (a) heart rate and KD10, (b) heart rate and KD10, (c) heart rate and NO2, (d) arousal and SO2, (e) arousal and KD10, (f) arousal and KD10, (g) arousal and CO, (h) arousal and CO, (i) happiness and magnetic storm, (j) happiness and magnetic storm based on the values measured at six Vilnius intersections.
AVABEPS and built environment pollution correlational analysis results.
| SO2 | KD2.5 | KD10 | NO2 | CO | O3 | Magnetic Storm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anger | 0.489 ** | 0.507 ** | 0.306 | 0.472 ** | 0.564 ** | 0.565 ** | 0.558 ** |
| Valence | −0.613 * | −0.380 * | −0.417 * | −0.498 * | −0.298 | −0.621 ** | −0.572 ** |
| Sadness | 0.740 ** | 0.511 ** | 0.515 | 0.517 ** | 0.339 | 0.683 ** | 0.477 * |
| Arousal | 0.698 * | 0.614 ** | 0.566 ** | 0.086 | 0.635 ** | 0.719 ** | −0.170 |
| Scared | 0.510 | 0.510 ** | 0.605 ** | 0.501 * | 0.550 ** | 0.571 * | 0.402 * |
| Disgust | 0.286 | 0.181 | 0.576 ** | 0.624 ** | 0.418 | 0.351 * | 0.513 ** |
| Heart rate | 0.399 * | 0.772 ** | 0.526 ** | −0.353 * | −0.077 | 0.412 | 0.590 ** |
| Happiness | −0.788 ** | 0.695 ** | −591 ** | −0.217 | −0.674 ** | −0.673 ** | −0.319 * |
* The correlation is significant at p < 0.05, ** The correlation is significant at p < 0.01.
Significance of links between AVABEPS and built environment pollution variables.
| SO2 | KD2.5 | KD10 | NO2 | CO | O3 | Magnetic Storm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anger | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| Valence | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| Sadness | + | + | − | + | − | + | + |
| Arousal | + | + | + | − | + | + | − |
| Scared | − | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Disgust | − | − | + | + | − | + | + |
| Heart rate | + | + | + | + | − | − | + |
| Happiness | + | + | + | − | + | + | + |
Potential housing buyers’ affective reactions such as boredom and interest and their relation to emotional and physiological states.
| Happy | Angry | Arousal | Sad | Scared | Disgusted | Surprised | Heart Rate | RPM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.951(5) | −0.515(26) | −0.751(19) | −0.565(19) | −0.504(20) | −0.522(19) | 0.579(20) | −0.658(7) | 0.510(17) |
|
| 0.507(20) | 0.509(13) | 0.885(23) | −0.564(6) | −0.751(7) | −0.516(15) | 0.568(25) | 0.505(13) | 0.587(20) |
The quantities above are correlations, followed by the number of days examined for the precise correlation specified in parentheses.
The effect of built environment pollution on physiological states such as the heart rate and breathing rate.
| SO2 | KD2.5 | KD10 | NO2 | CO | O3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPM | 0.817(19) | 0.583(22) | 0.587(14) | 0.601(19) | 0.534(18) | 0.515(134) |
| Heart Rate | 0.502(12) | 0.782(8) | 0.552(18) | 0.517(26) | 0.591(9) | 0.521(11) |
The quantities above are correlations, followed by the number of days examined for the precise correlation specified in parentheses.
Sum segmentation, neuro housing decision-making matrix.
| Indicators Defining Options | Sub-Indicators Defining Options | Measuring Units | Weight | Housing Unit Video Alternatives | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | A1 | … | Aj | … | An | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| Age (X1) | X11 (20–30 years) | Points | q 1 | + | x 111 | … | x 11j | … | x 11n |
| X12 (31–40 years) | Points | q 2 | + | x 121 | … | x 12j | … | x 12n | |
| X13 (41–60 years) | Points | q 3 | + | X 131 | … | x 13j | … | x 13n | |
| X14 (over 60 years) | Points | q 4 | + | x 141 | … | x 14j | … | x 14n | |
| Gender (X2) | X21 (male) | Points | q 5 | + | x 211 | … | x 21j | … | x 21n |
| X22 (female) | Points | q 6 | + | x 221 | … | x 22j | … | x 22n | |
| Education (X3) | X31 (higher) | Points | q 7 | + | x 311 | … | x 31j | … | x 31n |
| X32 (high and special secondary) | Points | q 8 | + | x 321 | … | x 32j | … | x 32n | |
| X33 (secondary) | Points | q 9 | + | x 331 | … | X33j | … | X33n | |
| X34 (basic) | Points | q 10 | + | X341 | … | x 34j | … | x 34n | |
| X35 (elementary) | Points | q 11 | + | X351 | … | X35j | … | x 35n | |
| X36 (incomplete elementary school) | Points | q 12 | + | X361 | … | x 36j | … | x 36n | |
| Marital status (X4) | X41 (married) | Points | q 13 | + | X411 | … | x 41j | … | x 41n |
| X42 (divorced) | Points | q 14 | + | X421 | … | x 42j | … | x 42n | |
| X43 (widowed) | Points | q 15 | + | X431 | … | x 43j | … | x 43n | |
| X44 (never married) | Points | q 16 | + | X441 | … | x 44j | … | x 44n | |
| Main source of earnings (X5) | X51 (salary/work compensation) | Points | q 17 | + | X511 | … | x 51j | … | x 51n |
| X52 (income from own or family business) | Points | q 18 | + | X521 | … | x 52j | … | x 52n | |
| X53 (income from agricultural activities) | Points | q 19 | + | X531 | … | x 53j | … | x 53n | |
| X54 (ownership or investment income) | Points | q 20 | + | X541 | … | x 54j | … | x 54n | |
| X55 (pension) | Points | q 21 | + | X551 | … | x 55j | … | x 55n | |
| X56 (governmental support) | Points | q 22 | + | X561 | … | x 56j | … | x 56n | |
| X57 (support by family and/or other persons) | Points | q 23 | + | X571 | … | x 57j | … | x 57n | |
| Families with children (X6) | X61 (families with children aged 0–17 yrs.) | Points | q 24 | + | X611 | … | x 61j | … | x 61n |
| X62 (families with no children aged 0–17 yrs.) | Points | q 25 | + | x 621 | … | x 62j | … | x 62n | |
| Price (X7) | X71 | Euro per sq. m. | q 26 | - | x 711 | … | x 71j | … | x 71n |
| Type of residential housing unit (X8) | X81 (one unit house) | Points | q 27 | + | x 811 | … | x 81j | … | x 81n |
| X82 (two-unit house) | Points | q 28 | + | x 821 | … | x 82j | … | x 82n | |
| X83 (multi-unit building dwelling) | Points | q 29 | + | x 831 | … | x 83j | … | x 83n | |
| Ownership form of residential dwelling (X9) | X91 (home owner resident) | Points | q 30 | + | x 911 | … | x 91j | … | x 91n |
| X92 (resident in a rental unit) | Points | q 31 | + | x 921 | … | X92j | … | x 92n | |
| Building materials (X10) | Points | q 32 | + | x 1011 | … | x 101j | … | x 101n | |
| Noise and air pollution (X11) | Points | q33 | + | x 1101 | … | x 110j | … | x 110n | |
| Energy consumption (floor heating, renewable energy sources, etc.) (X12) | Points | q 34 | + | x 1201 | … | x 120j | … | x 120n | |
| Aesthetic features (X13) | Points | q 35 | + | x 1301 | … | x 130j | … | x 130n | |
|
| |||||||||
| Urban quality (infrastructure) (X14) | Points | q 36 | + | X1401 | … | X140 j | … | X140 n | |
| Green spaces (X15) | Points | q 37 | + | X1501 | … | X150 j | … | X150 n | |
|
| |||||||||
| Happiness (X16) | Points | q 38 | + | X1601 | … | X160 j | … | X160 n | |
| Interest (X17) | Points | q39 | + | X1701 | … | X170 j | … | X170 n | |
| Valence (X18) | Points | q 40 | + | X1801 | … | X180 j | … | X180 n | |
| Arousal (X19) | Points | q 41 | + | X1901 | … | X190 j | … | X190 n | |
Sum neuro housing decision matrix compiled during the Old Town second-stage segmentation.
| Indicators Defining Options | Sub-Indicators Defining Options | * | Weight | Measu-ring Units | Housing Unit Video ad Alternatives | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Age | 31–40 years |
| 0.1826 | Points | 7 | 6 | 7 | … | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Gender | Male |
| 0.1826 | Points | 7 | 9 | 8 | … | 6 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| Education | Higher |
| 0.0925 | Points | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | |
| Marital status | Married |
| 0.0989 | Points | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | |
| Main source of earnings | Salary/work compensation |
| 0.1398 | Points | 7 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 7 | |
| Families with children | Families with no children |
| 0.0560 | Points | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Price (G1) | Average price (1 euro sq. m.) |
| 0.8 | €/m2 | 1830 | 1450 | 1700 | 4050 | 1290 | 3710 | 1320 | |
| Type of residential housing unit | Multi-unit building dwelling |
| 0.1662 | Points | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | |
| Ownership form of residential dwelling | Resident in a rental unit |
| 0.0730 | Points | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 | |
| Building materials |
| 0.096 | Points | 7 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 7 | ||
| Noise and air pollution |
| 0.08 | Points | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | ||
| Energy usage |
| 0.184 | Points | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | ||
| Aesthetic properties |
| 0.04 | Points | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Urban quality (infrastructure) |
| 0.144 | Points | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 7 | ||
| Green spaces |
| 0.096 | Points | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Happiness |
| 0.1 | Points | 0.135 | 0.135 | 0.135 | 0.135 | 0.135 | 0.135 | 0.135 | ||
| Interest |
| 0.1 | Points | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | ||
| Valence |
| 0.1 | Points | −0.131 | −0.131 | −0.131 | −0.131 | −0.131 | −0.131 | −0.131 | ||
| Arousal |
| 0.1 | Points | 0.330 | 0.330 | 0.330 | 0.330 | 0.330 | 0.330 | 0.330 | ||
| Significance | 0.0845 | 0.0887 | 0.0853 | 0.1057 | 0.0926 | 0.1005 | 0.0917 | |||||
| Priority of housing unit video alternatives | 18 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 8 | |||||
| Utility degree | 79.99 | 83.92 | 80.76 | 100 | 87.59 | 95.07 | 86.78 | |||||
*—The + (−) specifies that either a greater or lower criterion value means greater (lower) significance for customers.
Video advertisements on housing units and their descriptions.
| Line | Name of RE Project | Video, Tour, Gallery | RE Project Descriptions | Targeted Age Group * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ozo kvartetas (apartment-style dwelling units) |
| Small, economy class apartment-style units designated for a young, modern person without a family. New buildings surround this project. It has an average distance from the city center. The entire, required infrastructure is nearby. | I, IV |
| 2. | Ozo parkas (apartment-style dwelling units) |
| This project is economy to middle class. Buyers are offered apartment-style, 1 to 3-room dwelling units. This is an entire residential micro-region with new buildings. A recreational zone is alongside the park. The target audience consists of young families; however, persons of various ages are accommodated. | II, IV |
| 3. | Miesto ritmu (apartment-style dwelling units in the Šnipiškės district) |
| Average class project located in the city’s central district. Offers to buyers are for apartment-style, 1 to 4-room dwelling units. A center of numerous city businesses neighbors the project. The target group of buyers consists of employed persons. Excellent accessibility with the city’s historical center as well as with the other districts is available. | II, III |
| 4. | Žirmūnų skveras (apartment-style dwelling units in the Žirmūnai district) |
| Average class project is in a central district of the city. Offers to buyers are for apartment-style, 1 to 4-room dwelling units. Excellent accessibility with the city’s historical center as well as with the other districts is available. A river runs along the project. Pedestrian walkways including a recreational zone are available. | II, III |
| 5. | Raitininkų sodai (apartment-style dwelling units in the Žirmūnai district) |
| Upper average class project in the city’s center accommodates families with small children along with older persons. The construction quality is high. Excellent accessibility with the city’s historical center as well as with the other districts is available. A river runs along the project. Pedestrian walkways including a recreational zone are available. | II, III |
| 6. | Namų pynės (apartment-style dwelling units in the Žirmūnai district) |
| Average class project is in a central district of the city. Offers to buyers are for apartment-style, 1 to 3-room dwelling units. Excellent accessibility with the city’s historical center as well as with the other districts is available. A river runs along the project. Pedestrian walkways including a recreational zone are available. | II, III |
| 7. | Rinktinės namai (apartment-style dwelling units in the Verkiai district) |
| Average class project is in a central district of the city. Offers to buyers are for apartment-style, 2 to 4-room dwelling units. Excellent accessibility with the city’s historical center as well as with the other districts is available. Many business centers of the city neighbor the project. The target buyer group consists of employed persons. | II, III |
| 8. | Veikmės parko namai (apartment-style dwelling units in the Baltupiai district) |
| A modern average class project in one of the bedroom districts. Nature surrounds the project. It displays exceptional architectural and engineering decisions that employ passive home technologies. | II, III |
| 9. | Levandų namai (apartment-style dwelling units in the Pašilaičiai district) |
| Economy class project is in one of the more distant districts of the city. Offers of small apartment-style, dwelling units are for young families or older single people. | I, II |
| 10. | Elguvos deimantai (apartment-style dwelling units in the Karoliniškės-Ozas district) |
| Elguvos Deimantai is a low-rise, construction project located in the Karoliniškės district. It merges with its neighboring woodlands. Fencing encompasses the entire project. Its construction materials are high quality containing heat insulation. It contains underground and ground parking and storage sheds. Potential buyers include older people, generally businesspeople and high-level specialists. | II, III |
| 11. | Kalvarijų St. multi-unit building dwelling |
| Apartment-style dwelling units in a residential micro-region are located near the city’s center. The units are part of a monolithic building of an old construction that has been remodeled. Potential buyers are single persons or families of average and lower incomes. | I, IV |
| 12. | Pavasaris (apartment-style dwelling units in the Lazdynai district) |
| Economy class project in one of the city’s bedroom residential districts is at a distance from the city’s center. Still, it assures the entire, needed infrastructure and full services. It neighbors a recreational zone. Potential buyers include families satisfied to live at a distance from the city’s center along with existing residents of the district. | II, IV |
| 13. | Žirgų 1 (houses, cottages) | This is an economy class square of cottages located in the Vilnius suburbs. It is a price alternative dwelling, the same as many other cottages in this class. Its location is at a distance from the city’s center. Potential buyers include families desiring greater spaciousness for whom the distance from the city’s center has no relevance. | II, III | |
| 14. | Valakampių krantas (cottages) |
| Luxury class project built with high quality buildings and modern engineering decisions. The neighborhood is solid and stable. Nature surrounds the project. It is for those who desire a comfortable life style but have no need to be near the city’s center. It suits persons in higher income and older groups. | III |
| 15. | Baltupio krantas (cottages) | Luxury class project is located in a bedroom district at about an average distance from the city’s center. It suits buyers who desire greater privacy, spaciousness and nature but without sacrificing ease of accessibility with the city’s center. It is suitable for older people. | II, III | |
| 16. | Brick house in the Kalnėnai district |
| Brick house constructed in 2004 in the Kalnėnai district, which is under intensive development in Vilnius. This is a fully equipped, spacious house with a garage and other subsidiary facilities. It has a convenient driveway. It suits families; though, the social infrastructure is still not fully developed (it has no nurseries, shops or the like). | II, III |
| 17. | Live square |
| Luxury class project located in the city’s center. It is equally as suitable as an investment or for a modern, comfortable residence. The highest standards in construction quality are assured. Excellent accessibility in all directions combines with an excellent infrastructure and solid neighborhood. Potential buyers consist of older people, generally businesspeople or high-level specialists. | II, III |
| 18. | Karaliaučiaus slėnis |
| Economy class cottages harmoniously constructed in a square, located in a bedroom district. This is an alternative to an apartment-style unit by price, the same as are many other cottages of this class. However, it is at a distance from the city’s center. This project was awarded for harmonious development in 2016. Potential buyers include families requiring greater space for whom the city’s center is not a relevant aspect. | II, III |
| 19. | CNTRL |
| Luxury class project located in the city’s center is as suitable for an investment as for a modern, convenient residence. The highest standard in construction quality is assured. Accessibility is excellent in all directions. The infrastructure is excellent and the neighborhood, solid. Potential buyers include older people, generally businesspeople or high-level specialists. | III |
| 20. | Vilniaus vakarai |
| Economy class apartment-style units and cottages in a bedroom district are available in an area with an undeveloped infrastructure. Thus potential buyers must be mobile. It suits those who search from a natural setting and who want relaxation from the city’s hubbub. | II, III |
* Target age groups: I—(20–30) II—(31–40) III—(41–60) IV—(60+).
Correlation matrix of potential housing buyers’ emotions with features characterizing the built environment.
| SO2 | KD2.5 | KD10 | NO2 | CO | O3 | Magnetic Storm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angry | 0.489 | 0.507 | 0.306 | 0.472 | 0.564 | 0.565 | 0.558 |
| Valence | −0.613 | −0.380 | −0.417 | −0.498 | −0.298 | −0.621 | −0.572 |
| Sad | 0.740 | 0.511 | 0.515 | 0.517 | 0.339 | 0.683 | 0.477 |
| Arousal | 0.698 | 0.614 | 0.566 | 0.086 | 0.635 | 0.719 | −0.170 |
| Scared | 0.510 | 0.510 | 0.605 | 0.501 | 0.550 | 0.571 | 0.402 |
| Disgusted | 0.286 | 0.181 | 0.576 | 0.624 | 0.418 | 0.351 | 0.513 |
| Happy | −0.788 | 0.695 | −0.591 | −0.217 | −0.674 | −0.673 | −0.319 |
Table of proximities of potential housing buyers’ emotions, valence, and arousal for Multidimensional Scaling.
| Angry | Valence | Sad | Arousal | Scared | Disgusted | Happy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angry | 0.000 | 2.625 | 0.424 | 0.911 | 0.340 | 0.559 | 2.604 |
| Valence | 2.625 | 0.000 | 2.780 | 2.616 | 2.680 | 2.450 | 1.226 |
| Sad | 0.424 | 2.780 | 0.000 | 0.842 | 0.352 | 0.669 | 2.762 |
| Arousal | 0.911 | 2.616 | 0.842 | 0.000 | 0.759 | 1.138 | 2.705 |
| Scared | 0.340 | 2.680 | 0.352 | 0.759 | 0.000 | 0.503 | 2.689 |
| Disgusted | 0.559 | 2.450 | 0.669 | 1.138 | 0.503 | 0.000 | 2.534 |
| Happy | 2.604 | 1.226 | 2.762 | 2.705 | 2.689 | 2.534 | 0.000 |
Figure 4Visualization of a set of human emotions based on built environmental features.