| Literature DB >> 32228956 |
Erfan Dashtimoghadam1, Alexander Johnson2, Farahnaz Fahimipour1, Mohamadali Malakoutian3, Jessica Vargas1, Jose Gonzalez1, Mohamed Ibrahim4, John Baeten2, Lobat Tayebi5.
Abstract
Passive activation of endodontic irrigants provides improved canal disinfection, smear layer removal, and better subsequent sealing. Although evidence suggests that passive activating endodontic devices increase the effectiveness of irrigation, no study exists to quantitatively compare and validate vibrational characteristics and cavitation produced by different ultrasonic endodontic devices. The current study aims to compare the efficiency of various commercially available ultrasonic endodontic activating devices (i.e., EndoUltra™, EndoChuck, Irrisafe™, and PiezoFlow®). The passive endodontic activating devices were characterized in terms of tip displacement and cavitation performance using scanning laser vibrometry (SLV) and sonochemical analysis, respectively. The obtained results showed that activator tip displacements and speed correlate to established cavitation thresholds. The EndoUltra™ tip speed was measured to be 14.5 and 28.1 m/s at 45 and 91 kHz, respectively, which is greater than the threshold. The EndoUltra™ was found to be the only device that exceeds the cavitation thresholds (i.e. tip speed and displacement), as evident from laser vibrometry analysis, and subsequently yielded measurable cavitation quantified via sonochemical analysis. All other passive endodontic activation devices, despite ultrasonic oscillation, were unable to produce cavitation.Entities:
Keywords: Cavitation; EndoUltra; Passive endodontic activating devices; Scanning laser vibrometry; Sonochemical analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32228956 DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl ISSN: 0928-4931