Literature DB >> 32228874

Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased.

Olivier Donnez1.   

Abstract

Around 20% of pregnant women undergo cesarean section (CS), and in most regions of the world CS rates continue to grow. There is still no clear definition of what is considered a normal physiologic aspect of a CS scar and what is abnormal. Cesarean scar defects (CSDs) should be suspected in women presenting with spotting, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, or infertility and a history of CS. CSDs can be visualized with the use of hysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging. It is reasonable to consider hormone therapy for CSDs as a symptomatic treatment in women who no longer wish to conceive and have no contraindications. In case of failure of or contraindications to medical treatment, surgery should be contemplated according to the severity of symptoms, including infertility, the desire or otherwise to preserve the uterus, the size of the CSD, and residual myometrium thickness (RMT) measurement. Hysteroscopy is considered to be more of a resection than a repair, so women who desire pregnancy should be excluded from this technique if the RMT is <3 mm, in which case repair is essential and can be achieved by only laparoscopic or vaginal approach. Women with CSDs need to be given complete information, including available literature, before any treatment decision is made. Because prevention is better than cure, risk factors should be identified early to ensure appropriate management.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar defect; hysterectomy; hysteroscopic resection; laparoscopic repair; vaginal repair

Year:  2020        PMID: 32228874     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Isthmocele, a rising pathology.

Authors:  Andreia de Vasconcelos Gaspar; Ana Brandão
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-14

2.  Pregnancy outcomes after hysteroscopic surgery in women with cesarean scar syndrome.

Authors:  Shunichiro Tsuji; Akimasa Takahashi; Asuka Higuchi; Akiyoshi Yamanaka; Tsukuru Amano; Fuminori Kimura; Ayumi Seko-Nitta; Takashi Murakami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Transplantation of human amniotic epithelial cells promotes morphological and functional regeneration in a rat uterine scar model.

Authors:  Yihui Fan; Junyan Sun; Qiuwan Zhang; Dongmei Lai
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.832

4.  A study on the timing of uterine artery embolization followed by pregnancy excision for cesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective study in China.

Authors:  Liping Yu; Zhuowei Xue; Bikang Yang; Qinyang Xu; Yincheng Teng
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Previous caesarean delivery and the presence of caesarean scar defects could affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yinfeng Zhang; Dominique de Ziegler; Xinyu Hu; Xiaomei Tai; Ying Han; Junfang Ma; Yunshan Zhang; Haining Luo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.