Josef Kopecký1, Veronika Navláčilová2, Jana Janoutová3, Vladimír Janout3. 1. Urology Department, Havirov Hospital, Havirov, Czech Republic. 2. Medihope Ltd., Olomouc, Czech Republic. 3. Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed at assessing the potential benefit of prostate health index (PHI) for early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and the use of PHI as a marker predicting the presence of PCa before performing prostate biopsy. METHODS: The study comprised 55 males who underwent prostate biopsy. Before the procedure, blood samples were collected to test prostate specific antigen (PSA) and free/total PSA ratio (%fPSA) and PHI was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the benefit of these values for predicting the presence of PCa. RESULTS: Based on histological examination 31 males were diagnosed with PCa, the remaining 24 were negative. Among the PCa patients, 39% had a Gleason score of 6, 26% had a score of 7 and 35% had a score of 8-10. There were statistically significant differences in PHI and PSA between males with and without PCa. The areas under the ROC curve for %fPSA, total PSA and PHI were 0.712, 0.746 and 0.789, respectively. PHI showed the best predictive ability to estimate biopsy results. If the cut-off criterion PHI > 36.4 (77.42% sensitivity, 66.67% specificity) had been used, 41.7% of males would have avoided unnecessary biopsy. CONCLUSION: The use of PHI may considerably improve the accuracy of PCa detection in patients with elevated PSA and thus reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed at assessing the potential benefit of prostate health index (PHI) for early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and the use of PHI as a marker predicting the presence of PCa before performing prostate biopsy. METHODS: The study comprised 55 males who underwent prostate biopsy. Before the procedure, blood samples were collected to test prostate specific antigen (PSA) and free/total PSA ratio (%fPSA) and PHI was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the benefit of these values for predicting the presence of PCa. RESULTS: Based on histological examination 31 males were diagnosed with PCa, the remaining 24 were negative. Among the PCapatients, 39% had a Gleason score of 6, 26% had a score of 7 and 35% had a score of 8-10. There were statistically significant differences in PHI and PSA between males with and without PCa. The areas under the ROC curve for %fPSA, total PSA and PHI were 0.712, 0.746 and 0.789, respectively. PHI showed the best predictive ability to estimate biopsy results. If the cut-off criterion PHI > 36.4 (77.42% sensitivity, 66.67% specificity) had been used, 41.7% of males would have avoided unnecessary biopsy. CONCLUSION: The use of PHI may considerably improve the accuracy of PCa detection in patients with elevated PSA and thus reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.
Entities:
Keywords:
biopsy; prostate cancer; prostate health index; prostate specific antigen