Literature DB >> 32228712

Local and regional temporal trends (2013-2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA.

Jenna R Gettings1, Stella C W Self2, Christopher S McMahan3, D Andrew Brown3, Shila K Nordone4, Michael J Yabsley5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the USA, there are several Ehrlichia spp. of concern including Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia ewingii, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia muris eauclarensis, and "Panola Mountain Ehrlichia". Of these, E. canis is considered the most clinically relevant for domestic dogs, with infection capable of causing acute, subclinical, and chronic stages of disease. Changes in climate, land use, habitats, and wildlife reservoir populations, and increasing contact between both human and dog populations with natural areas have resulted in the increased risk of vector-borne disease throughout the world.
METHODS: A Bayesian spatio-temporal binomial regression model was applied to serological test results collected from veterinarians throughout the contiguous USA between January 2013 and November 2019. The model was used to quantify both regional and local temporal trends of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence and identify areas that experienced significant increases in seroprevalence.
RESULTS: Regionally, increasing seroprevalence occurred within several states throughout the central and southeastern states, including Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia and Texas. The underlying local trends revealed increasing seroprevalence at a finer scale. Clusters of locally increasing seroprevalence were seen from the western Appalachian region into the southern Midwest, along the Atlantic coast in New England, parts of Florida, Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota, and in a couple areas of the Mountain region. Clusters of locally decreasing seroprevalence were seen throughout the USA including New York and the mid-Atlantic states, Texas, the Midwest, and California.
CONCLUSIONS: Canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence is increasing in both endemic and non-endemic areas of the USA. The findings from this study indicate that dogs across a wide area of the USA are at risk of exposure and these results should provide veterinarians and pet owners with the information they need to make informed decisions about prevention of tick exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ehrlichia canis; Ehrlichia chaffeensis; Ehrlichia ewingii; Temporal trends; USA; Vector-borne

Year:  2020        PMID: 32228712     DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04022-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasit Vectors        ISSN: 1756-3305            Impact factor:   3.876


  6 in total

1.  Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens in Domestic Animals, Wild Pigs, and Off-Host Environmental Sampling in Guam, USA.

Authors:  Genevieve V Weaver; Neil Anderson; Kayla Garrett; Alec T Thompson; Michael J Yabsley
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-11

2.  Retrospective analysis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis in Thailand with emphasis on hematological and ultrasonographic changes.

Authors:  Kris Angkanaporn; Jidapha Sanguanwai; Taratip O Baiyokvichit; Pichamon Vorrachotvarittorn; Montana Wongsompong; Woraporn Sukhumavasi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 3.  Moonlighting in Rickettsiales: Expanding Virulence Landscape.

Authors:  Ana Luísa Matos; Pedro Curto; Isaura Simões
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-19

Review 4.  Epidemiologic, Clinical and Immunological Consequences of Co-Infections during Canine Leishmaniosis.

Authors:  Erin A Beasley; Danielle Pessôa-Pereira; Breanna M Scorza; Christine A Petersen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Triangulating the New Frontier of Health Geo-Data: Assessing Tick-Borne Disease Risk as an Occupational Hazard among Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  Sarah P Maxwell; Connie L McNeely; Chris Brooks; Kevin Thomas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques.

Authors:  Sakulchit Wichianchot; Nuttanan Hongsrichan; Cherdsak Maneeruttanarungroj; Somchai Pinlaor; Kantapong Iamrod; Andaman Purisarn; Peerawich Donthaisong; Panagiotis Karanis; Burin Nimsuphan; Rucksak Rucksaken
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 1.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.