| Literature DB >> 32228662 |
Luyanda Msolo1,2, Benson C Iweriebor3, Anthony I Okoh4,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cryptosporidium and Rotavirus agents have been associated with severe diarrheal illnesses and remain as one of the worst human health burdens in most developing regions. In the present study, we evaluated the incidences of Cryptosporidium and Rotavirus in diarrheal stool specimens of patients in some rural settlements of the Amathole District Municipality in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Stool specimens from diarrheal children and elderly individuals were collected from clinics and hospitals within the rural communities of the region over a period of 21 months (February 2017-November 2018). Commercial enzyme-immuno-assays were used for the detection of Rotavirus and Cryptosporidium pathogens from processed diarrheal stool specimens.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; Enzyme immunoassay; Etiology; Gastroenteritis; Rotavirus
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32228662 PMCID: PMC7106725 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05024-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Demographic data of the patients who tested positive for Cryptosporidium and Rotavirus pathogens
| Patient(s) | Age range (years) | Type of locality (rural/semi-rural/peri-urban/urban) | Source of income (employment) | Total no. of individuals per household | Source of water/storage | Type of sanitary system (toilets/restrooms/lavatories) | Distance to the nearest medical centre/clinic/Hospital (km) | History of diarrhea within the household and period of diagnosis | Immune/health status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P04 | ≥ 41 | Rural | Social grant | 8 | Tap/storage tanks | Flushable toilets | ≈ 5 | Yes/3 days | Diabetic |
| P01 | ≥ 41 | Rural | Social grant | 8 | Tap/storage tanks | Flushable toilet | ≈ 5 | No | Diabetic |
| P03 | ≤ 5 | Rural | – | 3 | Tap | Pit toilet | ≈ 8 | No | Healthy |
| P 07 | 6–40 | Rural | Social grant | 6 | Tap and storage tanks | Flushable toilet | ≈ 12 | No | Undisclosed |
| KH01 | ≤ 5 | Rural | – | 11 | Tap | Flushable toilets | 4 | No | Healthy |
| KH03 | ≤ 5 | Rural | – | 4 | Tap | Flushable toilets | ≈ 8 | No | Healthy |
| KH 04 | ≤ 5 | Rural | – | 8 | Tap | Flushable toilets | ≈ 4 | No | Healthy |
| KH 05 | ≤ 5 | Peri-urban | – | 7 | Tap | In-house restroom | ≈ 1 | No | Healthy |
| KH 07 | ≤ 5 | Rural | – | 6 | Tap | Flushable toilets | ≈ 3 | No | Healthy |
| KH 10 | ≤ 5 | Rural | Social grant | 4 | Tap | Pit toilet | ≈ 8 | No | Undisclosed |
| KH 12 | ≤ 5 | Rural | – | 9 | Tap | Flushable toilets | ≈ 8 | No | Healthy |
| KH 13 | 6–40 | Semi-rural | – | 10 | Tap/storage tanks | Flushable toilet | ≈ 4 | No | Undisclosed |
| MHC 02 | ≤ 5 | Rural | Social grant | 8 | Tap/storage tank | In-house restroom | ≈ 1 | No | – |
| MHC 03 | ≤ 5 | Rural | Social grant | 8 | Tap | Pit toilet | ≈ 7 | Yes/2 days | – |
| MHC 04 | ≤ 5 | Rural | Social grant | 5 | Tap | Flushable toilet | ≈ 5 | No | – |
| MHC 06 | ≤ 5 | Rural | Social grant | 5 | Tap/storage tanks | Flushable toilet | ≈ 5 | Yes/2 days | – |
| Vic 02 | ≤ 5 | Semi-rural | – | 8 | Tap/storage tanks | Flushable toilet | ≈ 2 | No | – |
| Vic 04 | 6–40 | Semi-rural | – | 9 | Tap/storage tanks | Flushable toilet | ≈ 2 | Yes | Healthy |
| Vic 06 | ≤ 5 | Semi-rural | – | 4 | Tap | Flushable toilet | ≈ 2 | No | Healthy |
| UN 01 | 6–40 | Rural | Unemployed | 8 | Storage tanks | Pit toilet | ≈ 8 | No | Undisclosed |
| R07 | ≥ 41 | Peri-urban | Employed | 5 | Storage tanks | Flushable toilet | ≈ 2 | Yes | Undisclosed |