Literature DB >> 32228638

The association of dry eye syndrome and psychiatric disorders: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Chiao-Ying Liang1,2, Wai-Man Cheang3, Chun-Yuan Wang1, Keng-Hung Lin1, Li-Chen Wei1, Yu-Yen Chen1, Ying-Cheng Shen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several previous studies reported a greater prevalence of dry eye syndrome (DES) among patients with psychiatric diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of DES in patients with psychiatric disorders (PD) using nationwide population-based data in Taiwan.
METHODS: This population-based cohort study retrospectively identified patients with PD from 1997 to 2011. Patients with both PD and DES served as the DES cohort, and PD patients without DES comprised the non-DES cohort. PD was defined as a diagnosis of PD (ICD-9-CM 290-319) made by psychiatrists only, with at least three consecutive outpatient visits or at least one inpatient visit. DES was defined as a diagnosis of DES (ICD-9-CM 375.15) and a prescription for an eye lubricant (anatomical therapeutic chemical code, ATC code: S01XA). The main outcome measures were the prevalence of DES in these patients and associated risk factors.
RESULTS: A total of 75,650 patients with PD (3665 in the DES cohort and 71,985 in the non-DES cohort) were included in the final analysis. The majority of patients in the DES group were women (72.6%), compared the non-DES group (57.8%). The mean age of patients in the DES cohort was 62.2 ± 14.9, which was significantly older than those in the non-DES group (50.9 ± 17.5). The patients with DES had a significantly greater likelihood of having dementia, bipolar disorder, depression, and neurotic disorders. Conditional regression analyses revealed that patients with dry eye disease were more likely to have schizophrenia (OR = 1.34), bipolar disorder (OR = 1.9), depression (OR = 1.54), and neurotic disorders (OR = 1.62). In addition, patients with DES were more likely to use 1st generation anti-psychotics (OR = 1.28) and had a lower risk of using 2nd generation anti-psychotics (OR = 0.64).
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that among PD patients, DES is highly prevalence in certain subtypes of PD, such as depression, bipolar disorder, and neurotic disorders, after adjusting for the comorbidities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar; Dry eye syndrome; Population-based; Psychiatric disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32228638      PMCID: PMC7106586          DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01395-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1471-2415            Impact factor:   2.209


Background

Dry eye syndrome (DES) is a common ocular surface disease worldwide. It is a multifactorial disease of tears and ocular surface (DEWS 2007), causing irritation, blurred vision, burning, and foreign body sensation which affect patients’ work, daily activities, quality of life, and emotions [1, 2]. Several previous epidemiological studies reported a greater prevalence of DES among patients with psychiatric diseases, such as depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder [3-7]. However, information on the potential association between psychiatric disorders (PD) and DES is limited. Understanding of the interactions and chronology between PD, anti-psychotics, and DES is crucial for the integrated care of these patients. In the current study, we aim to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of DES in patients with psychiatric disorders using a nationwide population-based database from 1997 to 2011 in Taiwan.

Methods

Data source

The data were obtained from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). The Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) program was established on March 1, 1995, and currently provides health care coverage for 99% of the country’s population, approximately 23 million people. In this study, we used the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2010 (LHID2010), a subset of the NHIRD, comprising 1,000,000 randomly selected NHI beneficiaries. Patients’ demographic data including gender, date of birth, income level, and healthcare data including diagnostic codes, drug prescriptions, and medical procedures contained in the database and are made available to researchers. To protect patients’ privacy, all personally identifiable information is encrypted prior to release. The NHI records diagnoses according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM).

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan (CE13152B-6). In this study, the requirement for informed consent was waived because the patients’ original identification numbers were anonymized by encryption.

Study population

This population-based cohort study retrospectively identified patients with PD (ICD-9-CM 290–319) from 1997 to 2011 from the LHID2010. We defined PD diagnoses as those made by psychiatrists only, with at least three consecutive outpatient visits or at least one inpatient visit. Patients with both PD and DES (ICD-9-CM 375.15) served as the DES cohort, and PD patients without DES comprised the non-DES cohort. DES was defined as a diagnosis of DES and a prescription for an eye lubricant (anatomical therapeutic chemical code, ATC code: S01XA). Subjects who had a diagnosis of DES prior to the diagnosis of PD were excluded from this study. In addition, we excluded patients younger than 18 years and any PD diagnosis related to children or infants (ICD-9-CM 299, 312–316). Moreover, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) patients were also excluded.

Main measure outcomes

The main outcome measures were the prevalence of DES in PD patients and associated risk factors.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were conducted using the SAS 9.3 statistical package (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). We used Pearson’s Chi-square tests to compare the prevalence rates of different PD among patients with and without DES. In addition, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for gender, age, and each subtype of the PD were conducted to calculate the risk among patients with and without DES. A p-value < 0.05 in 2-tailed tests was defined as significant.

Results

Among the 1,000,000 subjects in the database, 90,318 patients were identified as being diagnosed with a PD (Fig. 1). We excluded 14,668 patients who had a diagnosis of DES prior to the diagnosis of PD (n = 2771), were younger than 18 years (n = 1195), had a PD diagnosis related to children or infants (n = 10,205), or had a diagnosis of RA (n = 260), SLE (n = 105), or SS (n = 132). The remaining 75,650 patients with PD (3665 in the DES cohort and 71,985 in the non-DES cohort) were included in the final analysis.
Fig. 1

Flowchart of the study sample selection from the National Health Insurance Research Database

Flowchart of the study sample selection from the National Health Insurance Research Database The baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups are compared in Table 1. The majority of patients in the DES group were women (72.6%). The mean age (±standard deviation) of the patients in the DES cohort was 62.2 ± 14.9, which was significantly older than that of the non-DES group (50.9 ± 17.5).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of PD patients with and without dry eye for the period 1997–2011

Dry Eye Syndrome (DES)
Non = 71,985Yesn = 3665
Variablesn(%)n(%)p-value
Gender< 0.001
 Women41,594(57.8)2660(72.6)
 Men30,391(42.2)1005(27.4)
Age, years< 0.001
 Mean ± SD50.9 ± 17.562.2 ± 14.9< 0.001
  < 308402(11.7)77(2.1)
 30–3913,367(18.6)227(6.2)
 40–4915,213(21.1)494(13.5)
 50–5914,499(20.1)760(20.7)
 60–698837(12.3)891(24.3)
 ≧7011,667(16.2)1216(33.2)
Baseline characteristics of PD patients with and without dry eye for the period 1997–2011 The prevalence rates of the different diagnoses of PD in patients with and without DES are shown in Table 2. The patients with DES had significantly greater prevalence rates of dementia, bipolar disorder, depression, and neurotic disorders. In contrast, prevalence rates of drug or alcoholic psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychiatric retardation were lower in DES patients. No significant differences in the prevalence rates of paranoid states and obsessive-compulsive disorders were found between patients in the DES and non-DES cohorts.
Table 2

Psychiatric disorder conditions as defined by ICD-9-CM in PD patients with and without dry eye for the period 1997–2011

Dry Eye Syndrome
Non = 71,985Yesn = 3665
Psychiatric disorder condition(ICD-9-CM)n(%)n(%)p-value
Dementia(290, 331.0, 331.2)7426(10.3)534(14.6)< 0.001
Alcoholic psychoses(291)1707(2.4)35(1.0)< 0.001
Drug psychoses(292)1339(1.9)38(1.0)< 0.001
Schizophrenia(295)4242(5.9)151(4.1)< 0.001
Bipolar disorder(296)2968(4.1)267(7.3)< 0.001
Major depression(296.2, 296.3)17,001(23.6)1180(32.2)< 0.001
Paranoid states(297)1822(2.5)90(2.5)0.777
Neurotic disorders(300)59,528(82.7)3400(92.8)< 0.001
Obsessive-compulsive disorders(300.3)2059(2.9)109(3.0)0.687
Minor depression(300.4, 309.0, 309.1, 311)38,542(53.5)2382(65.0)< 0.001
Mild mental retardation(317)1136(1.6)17(0.5)< 0.001
Other specified mental retardation(318)949(1.3)4(0.1)< 0.001
Unspecified mental retardation(319)1266(1.8)16(0.4)< 0.001
Psychiatric disorder conditions as defined by ICD-9-CM in PD patients with and without dry eye for the period 1997–2011 Table 3 shows the crude and adjusted OR and 95% CI for each of the PD, comparing patients with and without DES.
Table 3

A comparison of baseline characteristics of dry eye and non-dry eye patients based on PD conditions in univariate and multivariate models

VariablesUnivariate modelMultivariate modelb
ORa(95% CI)p-valueOR(95% CI)p-value
Gender
 Women1.00(reference)1.00(reference)
 Men0.52(0.48–0.56)< 0.0010.60(0.56–0.65)< 0.001
Age, years
  < 401.00(reference)1.00(reference)
 40–491.85(1.43–2.40)< 0.0011.38(1.06–1.80)< 0.001
 50–593.54(2.78–4.51)0.0012.17(1.70–2.78)0.000
 60–695.72(4.52–7.24)< 0.0012.97(2.33–3.79)0.001
 70–7911.00(8.70–13.9)< 0.0015.24(4.10–6.72)< 0.001
 ≧8011.37(9.01–14.3)< 0.0016.42(4.98–8.27)< 0.001
Psychiatric disorder (Yes vs. No)
 Dementia1.48(1.35–1.63)< 0.0010.73(0.65–0.82)< 0.001
 Alcoholic psychoses0.40(0.28–0.56)< 0.0010.59(0.42–0.83)0.003
 Drug psychoses0.55(0.40–0.76)< 0.0010.85(0.61–1.18)0.332
 Schizophrenia0.69(0.58–0.81)< 0.0011.34(1.11–1.62)0.002
 Bipolar disorder1.83(1.60–2.08)< 0.0011.90(1.65–2.19)< 0.001
 Major depression1.54(1.43–1.65)< 0.001
 Paranoid states0.97(0.78–1.20)0.7791.01(0.81–1.27)0.928
 Neurotic disorders2.68(2.36–3.05)< 0.0011.62(1.42–1.85)< 0.001
 Obsessive-compulsive disorders1.04(0.86–1.27)0.682
 Minor depression1.61(1.50–1.73)< 0.001
 Mild mental retardation0.29(0.18–0.47)< 0.0011.15(0.69–1.93)0.597
 Other specified mental retardation0.08(0.03–0.22)< 0.0010.25(0.09–0.70)0.008
 Unspecified mental retardation0.24(0.15–0.40< 0.0010.84(0.49–1.43)0.519
Anti-psychotics
 None1.00(reference)1.00(reference)
 First generation2.06(1.87–2.27)< 0.0011.28(1.15–1.41)< 0.001
 Second generation0.65(0.44–0.94)< 0.0010.64(0.44–0.95)0.005
 Both1.61(1.42–1.81)< 0.0011.07(0.92–1.23)0.118

aOR, odds ratio

badjusted for all variables in table

A comparison of baseline characteristics of dry eye and non-dry eye patients based on PD conditions in univariate and multivariate models aOR, odds ratio badjusted for all variables in table Conditional regression analyses conditioned on gender and age revealed that compared to patients without DES, patients with DES were more likely to have schizophrenia (OR = 1.34), bipolar disorder (OR = 1.9), depression (OR = 1.54), and neurotic disorders (OR = 1.62). In addition, patients with DES were more likely to use 1st generation anti-psychotics (OR = 1.28) and were less likely to use 2nd generation anti-psychotics (OR = 0.64).

Discussion

The aim of the current study was to use a nationwide population-based database to evaluate the prevalence of DES in patients with PD and to investigate the associated risk factors for the period 1997 to 2011. We found the prevalence of DES in adult patients with PD was 4.84% (n = 3665/75650). Among the patients with PD in our study, female gender, older age, and a number of medical comorbidities were associated with higher risk of DES after adjustment, and the result is consistent with prior studies [8, 9]. Furthermore, patients with DES had significantly greater risks of schizophrenia (OR = 1.34), bipolar disease (OR = 1.90), depression (OR = 1.54), sleeping disturbance/ insomnia (OR = 1.19), and neurotic disorders (OR = 1.24), including anxiety (OR = 1.34), than those without DES. However, prevalence of DES was significantly lower in patients with dementia (OR = 0.73) and mental retardation (OR = 0.25). Several previous studies demonstrated greater prevalence of DES in people with depression [3–5, 8, 9]. Furthermore, the severity of DES had a greater impact on the depressive symptoms compared with other psychosomatic symptoms [10]. Several mechanisms may explain the association between depression and DES [11-13]. First, we believe that inflammation may play a key role in the pathogenesis of both depression and DES. In patients with DES, increased production of inflammatory cytokines was found in the tears and conjunctiva, including TNF-a, IFN-c, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8.47–51 [14-16]. Depressive patients were also reported to have higher levels of inflammatory cytokines and neuropeptides in the blood [15-17]. These cytokines and neuropeptides may simultaneously lead to ocular surface inflammation and exacerbation of negative moods. Second, many previous studies reported depressive patients have a lower threshold of pain perception and often complaint worse dry eye symptom compare with patients without depression. “Neuropathic pain” caused by neural dysfunction plays a role in the unreasonable chronic pain in patients with DES and depression [18]. Third, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a class of antidepressant that have been reported to be significantly associated with DES. It is possible that SSRIs cause an anticholinergic side effect whereby altered serotonin levels affect the sensitivity thresholds of corneal nerves [19]. Further study on the correlation between SSRIs and DES is necessary. Our study also found that anxiety disorder was correlated with DES, which supports the findings of two previously reported case-control studies [4, 20]. Furthermore, Wen et al. found three significant independent predictors of DES in patients with anxiety, including older age, duration of PD, and the use of an SSRI [4]. There was a significantly increased risk of DES in patients with bipolar disorder (OR = 1.55). Dibajnia et al. showed significant decreased tear break up time in patients with bipolar disorder treated with either lithium carbonate or sodium valproate [5]. However, the mechanism of this pharmacologic effect is not clear. Older age has been shown to be associated with increased risk of both DES and dementia [1]. Previous studies demonstrated that patients with dementia have a greater risk of developing dry eye and Sjögren’s syndrome [21, 22]. However, we found a decreased risk of DES in dementia patients in our multivariate models. This is the first large-scale study to find this association. We believe the risk might have been underestimated because dementia patients may be less likely to report symptoms due to the decline in cognitive function and communication skills. A major strength of this study was the use of a large cohort study to investigate the association between DES and PD using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). This database covers approximately 99% of the country’s residents. However, there were several limitations in this study. First, it was a retrospective study and detailed information are not available in the NHIRD, such as socioeconomic status, severity of disease, and laboratory results. Second, we used strict exclusion criteria and definitions for the diagnosis of DES. Only patients with both ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 375.15 and an anatomical therapeutic chemical code for ophthalmological lubricants (ATC code: S01XA) were included in the analysis. This selection bias might have resulted in an underestimation of the prevalence of DES in psychiatric patients, because patients with only mild dry eye symptoms may not need to use any medication. In addition, some patients may seek other medications that are not available on the NHI system.

Conclusion

This nationwide population-based cohort study demonstrated that among PD patients, DES is highly prevalence in certain subtypes of PD, such as depression, bipolar disorder, and neurotic disorders, after adjusting for the comorbidities.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Autoimmunity in the pathogenesis and treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca.

Authors:  Katy C Liu; Kyle Huynh; Joseph Grubbs; Richard M Davis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Ocular surface immunity: homeostatic mechanisms and their disruption in dry eye disease.

Authors:  Stefano Barabino; Yihe Chen; Sunil Chauhan; Reza Dana
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Impact of Dry Eye on Psychosomatic Symptoms and Quality of Life in a Healthy Youthful Clinical Sample.

Authors:  Kofi Asiedu; Selassie K Dzasimatu; Samuel Kyei
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.018

Review 4.  Classical neurotransmitters and neuropeptides involved in major depression: a review.

Authors:  Felix-Martin Werner; Rafael Coveñas
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.292

5.  Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye syndrome in a United States veterans affairs population.

Authors:  Anat Galor; William Feuer; David J Lee; Hermes Florez; David Carter; Bozorgmehr Pouyeh; William J Prunty; Victor L Perez
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 6.  Dry eye disease: an immune-mediated ocular surface disorder.

Authors:  William Stevenson; Sunil K Chauhan; Reza Dana
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

7.  Comorbidities of dry eye disease: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Tsung-Jen Wang; I-Jong Wang; Chao-Chien Hu; Herng-Ching Lin
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  The Role of Health Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Ildikó Szakáts; Margit Sebestyén; János Németh; Emma Birkás; György Purebl
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.424

Review 9.  Inflammation and its discontents: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression.

Authors:  Andrew H Miller; Vladimir Maletic; Charles L Raison
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Tear Film Break-up Time in Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Parvin Dibajnia; Mohadeseh Mohammadinia; Maryam Moghadasin; Mohammad Aghazade Amiri
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2012
View more
  4 in total

1.  Problematic Internet Use Associated with Symptomatic Dry Eye Disease in Medical Students from Peru.

Authors:  I Benjamin Condori-Meza; L Alessandra Dávila-Cabanillas; Mabel R Challapa-Mamani; Antony Pinedo-Soria; Renato R Torres; Joel Yalle; Ricardo Rojas-Humpire; Salomón Huancahuire-Vega
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-29

2.  Dry Eye Disease in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Qiankun Chen; Zhengjiang Wei; Leying Wang; Xizhan Xu; Zhenyu Wei; Panpan Zheng; Kai Cao; Zijun Zhang; Kexin Chen; Qingfeng Liang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-09

3.  Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors vs Glucagonlike Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Incidence of Dry Eye Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Su; Jia-Horung Hung; Kai-Cheng Chang; Chi-Chin Sun; Yi-Hsun Huang; Chaw-Ning Lee; Ming-Jui Hung; Chi-Chun Lai; Shih-Chieh Shao; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

4.  Effect of acupuncture versus artificial tears for dry eye disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongjuan Fu; Junxiang Wang; Feng Zhang; Yong Tang; Hao Zhou; Chao Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.