Literature DB >> 32228156

Development of raw acceleration cut-points for wrist and hip accelerometers to assess sedentary behaviour and physical activity in 5-7-year-old children.

Matteo Crotti1,2, Lawrence Foweather2, James R Rudd1, Liezel Hurter2, Sebastian Schwarz1, Lynne M Boddy2.   

Abstract

This study validated sedentary behaviour (SB), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and vigorous physical activity (VPA) accelerometer cut-points in 5-7-year-old children. Participants (n = 49, 55% girls) wore an ActiGraph GT9X accelerometer, recording data at 100 Hz downloaded in 1 s epochs, on both wrists and the right hip during a standardised protocol and recess. Cut-points were generated using ROC analysis with direct observation as a criterion. Subsequently, cut-points were optimised using Confidence intervals equivalency analysis and then cross-validated in a cross-validation group. SB cut-points were 36 mg (Sensitivity (Sn) = 79.8%, Specificity (Sp) = 56.8%) for non-dominant wrist, 39 mg (Sn = 75.4%, Sp = 70.2%) for dominant wrist and 20 mg (Sn = 78%, Sp = 50.1%) for hip. MVPA cut-points were 189 mg (Sn = 82.6%, Sp = 78%) for non-dominant wrist, 181 mg (Sn = 79.1%, Sp = 76%) for dominant wrist and 95 mg (Sn = 79.3%, Sp = 75.6%) for hip. VPA cut-points were 536 mg (Sn = 75.1%, Sp = 68.7%) for non-dominant wrist, 534 mg (Sn = 67.6%, Sp = 95.6%) for dominant wrist and 325 mg (Sn = 78.2%, Sp = 96.1%) for hip. All placements demonstrated adequate levels of accuracy for SB and PA assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometry; criterion validity; objective measurement; raw signal; validation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32228156     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1740469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  Reliability Study of Inertial Sensors LIS2DH12 Compared to ActiGraph GT9X: Based on Free Code.

Authors:  Jaime Martín-Martín; Ariadna Jiménez-Partinen; Irene De-Torres; Adrian Escriche-Escuder; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio Muro-Culebras; Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Fermín Mayoral-Cleries; Attila Biró; Wen Tang; Borjanka Nikolova; Alfredo Salvatore; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-05

2.  Device-based measurement of physical activity in pre-schoolers: Comparison of machine learning and cut point methods.

Authors:  Matthew N Ahmadi; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Fundamental Movement Skills and Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity Levels during Early Childhood: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Dobell; Andy Pringle; Mark A Faghy; Clare M P Roscoe
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11

4.  Effect of Linear and Nonlinear Pedagogy Physical Education Interventions on Children's Physical Activity: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (SAMPLE-PE).

Authors:  Matteo Crotti; James R Rudd; Simon Roberts; Lynne M Boddy; Katie Fitton Davies; Laura O'Callaghan; Till Utesch; Lawrence Foweather
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15

5.  Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children's physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE).

Authors:  Matteo Crotti; James Rudd; Simon Roberts; Katie Fitton Davies; Laura O'Callaghan; Till Utesch; Lawrence Foweather
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Comparing estimates of physical activity in children across different cut-points and the associations with weight status.

Authors:  Marja H Leppänen; Jairo H Migueles; Anna M Abdollahi; Elina Engberg; Francisco B Ortega; Eva Roos
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 4.645

7.  Protocol for a multicenter-cluster randomized clinical trial of a motor skills intervention to promote physical activity and health in children: the CHAMP afterschool program study.

Authors:  Leah E Robinson; Kara K Palmer; María Enid Santiago-Rodríguez; Nicholas D Myers; Lu Wang; Karin A Pfeiffer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.135

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.