Literature DB >> 32227606

Are Current Technical Exclusion Criteria for Clinical Trials of Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Too Restrictive?: Early Experiences at a Pediatric Hospital.

Lung W Lau1,2, Avinash Eranki1, Haydar Celik1,3, AeRang Kim1, Peter C W Kim4, Karun V Sharma1, Pavel S Yarmolenko1.   

Abstract

Certain technical criteria must be met to ensure the treatment safety of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. We retrospectively reviewed how our enrollment criteria were applied from 2014 to 2017 in a clinical trial of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of recurrent malignant and locally aggressive benign solid tumors. Among the 36 screened patients between 2014 and 2017, more than one-third were excluded for technical exclusion criteria such as the anatomic location and proximity to prosthetics. Overall, patients were difficult to accrue for this trial, given the incidence of these tumors. To increase potential accrual, screening exclusion criteria could be more generalized and centered on the ability to achieve an acceptable treatment safety margin, rather than specifically excluding on the basis of general anatomic areas.
© 2020 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; criteria; magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32227606     DOI: 10.1002/jum.15259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  1 in total

1.  Feasibility of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment targeting distinct nodular lesions in neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Caitlin Tydings; Pavel Yarmolenko; Miriam Bornhorst; Eva Dombi; John Myseros; Robert Keating; James Bost; Karun Sharma; AeRang Kim
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-08-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.