Literature DB >> 3222760

The nasal response to exercise and exercise induced bronchoconstriction in normal and asthmatic subjects.

K P Strohl1, M J Decker, L G Olson, T A Flak, P L Hoekje.   

Abstract

Two studies were carried out to test the hypothesis that the fall and recovery of nasal resistance after exercise in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects are related to the development of bronchoconstriction after exercise. In study 1 nasal resistance (posterior rhinomanometry) and specific airway resistance (sRaw) were measured before challenge and one, five, 10 and 30 minutes after four minutes of exhausting legwork exercise in nine asthmatic subjects and nine age matched healthy subjects. One minute after exercise there was a reduction in nasal resistance of 49% (SD 15%) from baseline in the healthy subjects and of 66% (17%) in the asthmatic subjects. This response and the subsequent return of nasal resistance to baseline values did not differ significantly between the two groups despite a substantial difference in the change in sRaw, an increase of 74% (45%) in the asthmatic subjects 10 minutes after exercise, and no change in the non-asthmatic subjects. In study 2, nasal and specific airway resistances were monitored according to the same measurement protocol in six subjects with increased airway reactivity. Subjects exercised on two occasions, wearing a noseclip, once while breathing cold, dry air and once while breathing warm, humid air. The fall in nasal resistance was similar under both conditions (to 47% and 39% of baseline), through sRaw rose only after cold air inhalation (to 172% of baseline). The results indicate that the nasal response to exercise is not related to bronchial obstruction in asthmatic subjects after exercise or to the temperature or humidity of the air inspired through the mouth during exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3222760      PMCID: PMC461549          DOI: 10.1136/thx.43.11.890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  12 in total

1.  The maximal expiratory flow-volume curve. Normal standards, variability, and effects of age.

Authors:  R J Knudson; R C Slatin; M D Lebowitz; B Burrows
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1976-05

2.  Effects of cold air and carbon dioxide on nasal air flow resistance.

Authors:  Y Takagi; D F Proctor; S Salman; S Evering
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Nasal airway response to exercise.

Authors:  H B Richerson; P M Seebohm
Journal:  J Allergy       Date:  1968-05

4.  Increased pulmonary alpha-adrenergic and reduced beta-adrenergic receptors in experimental asthma.

Authors:  P J Barnes; C T Dollery; J MacDermot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Exercise-induced airway obstruction.

Authors:  E R McFadden; R H Ingram
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 19.318

6.  Nasal vasodilation induced by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve.

Authors:  K S Eccles; R Eccles
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Effects of exercise on nasal airflow resistance in healthy subjects and in patients with asthma and rhinitis.

Authors:  N C Syabbalo; A Bundgaard; J G Widdicombe
Journal:  Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec

8.  The switching point from nasal to oronasal breathing.

Authors:  V Niinimaa; P Cole; S Mintz; R J Shephard
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1980-10

9.  The response of the nasal airway to exercise.

Authors:  L G Olson; K P Strohl
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1987-02

10.  Recent advances in the understanding of exercise-induced asthma.

Authors:  S D Anderson
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis Suppl       Date:  1983
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.