| Literature DB >> 32226902 |
Yongbin Cao1, Wang Song2, Qin Jiang1, Ye Xu2, Sanjun Cai2, Sheng Wang2, Wuli Yang1.
Abstract
Photothermal therapy (PTT) in the second near-infrared window (NIR-II, 1000-1350 nm) has presented great superiority inEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32226902 PMCID: PMC7098022 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Illustration of Nanoparticles from Ancient Ink (AINPs) for Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Mapping and Photothermal Therapy (PTT) in the Second Near-Infrared (NIR-II) Window
As revealed by photoacoustic (PA) imaging, AINP dispersion after being injected to the primary tumor on the right hind foot pad could effectually transfer into the SLNs via the lymphatic vessels. NIR-II PTT was then implemented by exposing SLNs to a 1064 nm laser.
Figure 1Characterization of AINP dispersion. (a) XPS, (b) XRD, and (c) Raman spectrum of AINPs. (d) SEM and its corresponding (e) carbon and (f) oxygen element distribution of AINPs, scale bar: 200 nm. (g) Photographs of raw AINPs and AINP dispersion (by PVP modification) in different physiological environments after 3 days. (h) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) photograph of AINP dispersion. (i) Size distribution of AINP dispersion by dynamic light scattering (DLS).
Figure 2Photothermal performance and physicochemical stability of AINP dispersion. (a) UV–vis–NIR absorption spectra of AINP dispersion (50 μg/mL). (b) Temperature variation of AINP dispersion with different concentrations exposed to a 1064 nm laser (1 W/cm2, 5 min). (c) Temperature variation of AINP dispersion (100 μg/mL) under irradiation by a 1064 nm laser (1 W/cm2, 5 min) and an 808 nm laser (0.33 W/cm2, 5 min). (d) Photothermal effect, (e) ζ-potential, and (f) size distribution change of AINP dispersion at 0th and 90th day.
Figure 3In vitro photothermal efficacy of AINP dispersion. (a) Cell viability of CT-26 cancer cells and HEK-293T normal cells after being cultured with different concentrations of AINP dispersion for 24 h. (b) Respective cell viability of CT-26 cancer cells after being treated with AINP dispersion at different concentrations followed by laser irradiation (1 W/cm2 for 1064 nm and 0.33 W/cm2 for 808 nm) for 5 min. (c) CLSM images stained with calcein-AM (green fluorescence, live cells) and PI (red fluorescence, dead cells). (d) Flow cytometry analyses of CT-26 cancer cells after different treatments. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Figure 4In vitro and in vivo PA imaging. (a) PA signal intensity of AINP dispersion in vitro at various excitation wavelengths. (b) Linear relation between the PA signal in vitro versus different concentrations of AINP dispersion. (c) PA imaging and (d) intensity in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) at different time points. The whole image shows the right hind foot pad of nude mice and the PA positive region consistent with the SLN region. (e) Thermal images and local temperature of SLNs after being exposed to laser irradiation (1 W/cm2 for 1064 nm and 0.33 W/cm2 for 808 nm) for 10 min.
Figure 5In vivo photothermal therapy. (a) Photograph and weight of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from different treatments. H&E staining of SLNs from (b) control group, (c) 1064 nm laser group, (d) AINP group, (e) AINPs + 1064 nm laser group, and (f) AINPs + 808 nm laser group (1 W/cm2 for 1064 nm and 0.33 W/cm2 for 808 nm, 10 min); all of the scale bars are 100 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6H&E staining of the main organs of mice 30 days after the intravenous injection of AINP dispersion at elevated doses. All of the scale bars are 100 μm.
Figure 7Relevant blood indexes of mice from each group at different AINP doses of 0, 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg after intravenous administration and further feeding for 30 days.