| Literature DB >> 32226680 |
Janani Rangarajan1, Udayakumar Narasimhan2, Abhinayaa Janakiraman2, Prajitha Sasidharan3, Pavithraa Chandrasekaran1.
Abstract
Introduction Parenting style plays a major role in child development by influencing cognitive, social-emotional development, academic performance, and behavioral problems. These characteristics are fairly stable right into adulthood. The influence of risk factors in children on the parenting style of mothers and fathers has not been studied in developing countries. Aims and methods The aim of this study is to determine the parenting style of mothers and fathers of children (3-12 years) born with and without high risk and to analyze the influence of this on parenting style. This is an analytical, cross-sectional, comparative study. Sixty-four out of 90 parents of children who have been newborn intensive care unit (NICU) graduates, with moderate to severe risk factors at birth as per the National Neonatology Forum guidelines of India, and 73 parents of children without risk factors at birth were enrolled. A parenting style and dimension questionnaire was used. The commonest parenting style in mothers and fathers and a correlation between parenting style and risk factors in children at birth were identified. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between the high-risk and non-high-risk groups. Eighty percent of mothers and 70% of fathers followed the authoritative parenting style. There was no significant correlation between risk factors and gender, family type or socioeconomic status and the parenting style. Lack of follow-through was the only factor that was significantly present in fathers of children born without risk factors. Conclusion Authoritative was the most common parenting style, with no significant difference between parenting in the high-risk and non-high-risk groups. Adopting the appropriate parenting style will optimize developmental outcomes. Further studies are required to look at the influence of proactive positive parenting practices.Entities:
Keywords: authoritarian parent; authoritative parent; father; high risk newborn; mother; permissive parent
Year: 2020 PMID: 32226680 PMCID: PMC7093920 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Results of parenting styles and factors of mothers and fathers with or without risk factors at birth
| Parenting style | Factors of parenting style | Parents of children born with high risk at birth | Parents of children born without high risk at birth | |||
| Father | Mother | Father | Mother | |||
| Authoritative | Total (Overall Mean-15.026) | 42(65.6%) | 53(82.8%) | 54(74%) | 59(80.8%) | |
| Mean +/- SD | 15.81+/-2.64 | 17.04+/-1.57 | 16.33+/-2.50 | 16.64+/-1.85 | ||
| P-value | ||||||
| Father | 0.287 | |||||
| Mother | 0.763 | |||||
| Factor 1-Warmth & Involvement(Mean-4.13) | 38(59.4%) | 56(87.5%) | 43(58.9%) | 56(76.7%) | ||
| Factor 2-Reasoning/Induction(Mean-3.77) | 35(54.7%) | 48(75.0%) | 48(65.8%) | 55(75.3%) | ||
| Factor 3-Democratic Participation(Mean-3.306) | 43(67.2%) | 55(85.9%) | 57(78.1%) | 57(78.1%) | ||
| Factor 4-Good Natured/Easy Going(Mean-3.82) | 49(76.6%) | 49(76.6%) | 59(80.8%) | 48(65.8%) | ||
| Authoritarian | Total (Overall Mean-8.62) | 36(56.3%) | 41(64.1%) | 42(57.5%) | 47(64.4%) | |
| Mean +/- SD | 8.90+/-2.79 | 9.88+/-3.20 | 9.14+/-2.41 | 10.36+/-3.27 | ||
| P-value | ||||||
| Father | 0.88 | |||||
| Mother | 0.969 | |||||
| Factor 1-Verbal Hostility(Mean-2.37) | 27(42.2%) | 35(54.7%) | 36(49.3%) | 45(61.6%) | ||
| Factor 2-Corporal Punishment(Mean-1.8) | 35(54.7%) | 40(62.5%) | 50(68.5%) | 49(67.1%) | ||
| Factor 3-Non Reasoning, Punitive strategies(Mean-1.83) | 39(60.9%) | 45(70.3%) | 51(69.9%) | 54(74.0%) | ||
| Factor 4-Directiveness(Mean-2.62) | 29(45.3%) | 40(62.5%) | 33(45.2%) | 39(53.4%) | ||
| Permissive | Total (Overall Mean-6.17) | 39(60.9%) | 32(50.0%) | 39(53.4%) | 38(52.1%) | |
| Mean +/- SD | 6.33+/-1.67 | 6.17+/-1.72 | 6.36+/-1.47 | 6.19+/-1.43 | ||
| P-value | ||||||
| Father | 0.376 | |||||
| Mother | 0.81 | |||||
| Factor 1-Lack of Follow Through(Mean-2.28) | 21(32.8%) | 26(40.6%) | 43(58.9%) | 40(54.8%) | ||
| Factor 2-Ignoring Misbehaviour (Mean-1.8) | 25(39.1%) | 24(37.5%) | 25(34.2%) | 24(32.5%) | ||
| Factor 3-Self Confidence (Mean-2.09) | 42(65.6%) | 36(56.3%) | 39(53.4%) | 44(60.3%) | ||
Baseline characteristics
| HIGH RISK | NON-HIGH RISK | P-VALUE | |
| AGE | 0.054 | ||
| 3-5 years | 36 (56.25%) | 33 (45.2%) | |
| 6-9 year | 16 (25%) | 21 (28.7%) | |
| 10-12 years | 12 (18.75%) | 19 (26.2%) | |
| GENDER | 0.545 | ||
| Male | 34 (53.1%) | 35 (47.9%) | |
| Female | 30 (46.9%) | 38 (52.1%) | |
| SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS | 0.076 | ||
| Class I | 11 (17.2%) | 22 (30.1%) | |
| Class II and III | 52 (81.3%) | 47 (64.4%) | |
| Class IV and V | 1 (1.6%) | 4 (5.5%) | |
| BIRTH ORDER | 0.402 | ||
| 1st | 48 (75%) | 52 (71.2%) | |
| 2nd | 12 (18.8%) | 19 (26.0%) | |
| 3rd or more | 4 (6.3%) | 2 (2.7%) | |
| FAMILY TYPE | 0.525 | ||
| Nuclear | 47 (73.4%) | 50 (68.5%) | |
| Joint | 17 (26.6%) | 23 (31.5%) | |