| Literature DB >> 32226501 |
Zucheng Xie1, Yiwu Dang2, Huayu Wu3, Rongquan He1, Jie Ma1, Zhigang Peng1, Minhua Rong4, Zhekun Li2, Jiapeng Yang2, Yizhao Jiang2, Gang Chen2, Lihua Yang1.
Abstract
Cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 3 (CELSR3) has been reported in cancers but its role and potential molecular mechanism in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical value and molecular mechanism of CELSR3 in HCC using an in vitro experiment, a meta-analysis and bioinformatics. The in vitro experiment determined the promoting effect of CELSR3 in the proliferation, invasion, and migration of HCC cells. CELSR3 knockout causes S-phage arrest in HCC cells. CELSR3 can also inhibit the apoptosis of HCC cells. The expression of the CELSR3 gene and protein was significantly elevated in HCC. Elevated CELSR3 was correlated to the bigger tumor size, higher pathological stage, and the worse overall survival of HCC. Methylation analysis revealed that the hypomethylation of CELSR3 regulated by DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B may be the underlying mechanism of upregulated CELSR3. Biological enrichment analysis uncovered that the cell cycle, DNA replication, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways were important pathways regulated by CELSR3 and its co-expressed genes in HCC. Taken together, upregulated CELSR3 is an important regulator in the progression and prognosis of HCC. The hypomethylation of CELSR3 and its regulation in the cell cycle may be the potential molecular mechanism in HCC. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: CELSR3; apoptosis; cell cycle; hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32226501 PMCID: PMC7086248 DOI: 10.7150/jca.39328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Information on the included datasets
| Dataset | Platform | Author | Year | Country | HCC samples | Normal samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSE17967 | Affymetrix GPL571 | Archer KJ et al. | 2009 | USA | 16 | 47 |
| GSE12941 | Affymetrix GPL5175 | Yamada T et al. | 2010 | Japan | 10 | 10 |
| GSE25097 | Rosetta GPL10687 | Zhang C et al. | 2011 | USA | 268 | 289 |
| GSE36376 | Illumina GPL10558 | Lim HY et al. | 2012 | South Korea | 240 | 193 |
| GSE17548 | Affymetrix GPL570 | Ozturk M et al. | 2013 | Turkey | 17 | 20 |
| GSE46408 | Agilent GPL4133 | Jeng Y et al. | 2013 | Taiwan | 6 | 6 |
| GSE50579 | Agilent GPL14550 | Geffers R et al. | 2013 | Germany | 67 | 13 |
| GSE45114 | CapitalBio GPL5918 | Wei L et al. | 2013 | China | 24 | 25 |
| GSE22405 | Affymetrix GPL10553 | Zhang HH et al. | 2014 | USA | 24 | 24 |
| GSE39791 | Illumina GPL10558 | Kim J et al. | 2014 | USA | 72 | 72 |
| GSE46444 | Illumina GPL13369 | Chen X et al. | 2014 | USA | 88 | 48 |
| GSE54236 | Agilent GPL6480 | Villa E et al. | 2014 | Italy | 81 | 80 |
| GSE55092 | Affymetrix GPL570 | Melis M et al. | 2014 | USA | 49 | 91 |
| GSE57957 | Illumina GPL10558 | Mah W et al. | 2014 | Singapore | 39 | 39 |
| GSE58208 | Affymetrix GPL570 | Hui KM et al. | 2014 | Singapore | 10 | 17 |
| GSE62232 | Affymetrix GPL570 | Zucman-Rossi J et al. | 2014 | France | 81 | 10 |
| GSE59259 | NimbleGen GPL18451 | Udali S et al. | 2015 | Italy | 8 | 8 |
| GSE60502 | Affymetrix GPL96 | Kao KJ et al. | 2015 | Taiwan | 18 | 18 |
| GSE74656 | GeneChip GPL16043 | Tao Y et al. | 2015 | China | 10 | 5 |
| GSE64041 | Affymetrix GPL6244 | Makowska Z et al. | 2016 | Switzerland | 60 | 65 |
| GSE82177 | Illumina GPL11154 | Wijetunga NA et al. | 2016 | USA | 8 | 19 |
| GSE76427 | Illumina GPL10558 | Grinchuk OV et al. | 2017 | Singapore | 115 | 52 |
| GSE84005 | Affymetrix GPL5175 | Tu X et al. | 2017 | China | 38 | 38 |
| GSE121248 | Affymetrix GPL570 | Wang SM et al. | 2018 | Singapore | 70 | 37 |
| GSE124535 | HiSeq X Ten GPL20795 | Jiang Y et al. | 2019 | China | 35 | 35 |
Correlation between CELSR3 and the clinical parameters of HCC
| Variable | Groups | Number | Mean | SD | t | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue | Tumor | 371 | 7.680 | 1.680 | 13.901 | <0.001 |
| Normal | 50 | 4.280 | 1.096 | |||
| Gender | Male | 250 | 7.723 | 1.600 | 0.758 | 0.449 |
| Female | 121 | 7.582 | 1.837 | |||
| Age | <65 | 222 | 7.558 | 1.705 | -1.682 | 0.093 |
| ≥65 | 149 | 7.856 | 1.630 | |||
| T | T1+T2 | 275 | 7.573 | 1.694 | -2.327 | 0.021 |
| T3+T4 | 93 | 8.038 | 1.585 | |||
| N | No | 252 | 7.727 | 1.645 | -0.786 | 0.433 |
| Yes | 4 | 8.376 | 0.920 | |||
| M | No | 266 | 7.688 | 1.610 | 1.583 | 0.115 |
| Yes | 4 | 6.408 | 1.074 | |||
| Stage | Stage I+II | 257 | 7.569 | 1.692 | -2.399 | 0.017 |
| Stage III+IV | 90 | 8.058 | 1.574 | |||
| Grade | Grade 1+2 | 232 | 7.593 | 1.655 | -1.286 | 0.199 |
| Grade 3+4 | 134 | 7.827 | 1.721 | |||
| Residual tumor | R0 | 324 | 7.673 | 1.692 | 0.068 | 0.946 |
| R1 | 18 | 7.645 | 1.587 | |||
| Cancer status | Tumor free | 234 | 7.487 | 1.667 | -2.431 | 0.016 |
| With tumor | 110 | 7.957 | 1.682 | |||
| Child grade | A | 217 | 7.678 | 1.687 | -0.072 | 0.943 |
| B+C | 22 | 7.705 | 1.442 | |||
| AFP | Positive | 114 | 7.396 | 1.667 | -1.733 | 0.084 |
| Negative | 149 | 7.754 | 1.648 | |||
| Primary risk factor | No | 91 | 7.406 | 1.665 | -1.773 | 0.077 |
| Yes | 249 | 7.770 | 1.680 |