Literature DB >> 32226305

The lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 Axis Modulates Osteoblast Differentiation.

Yuan Xiong1, Lang Chen1, Chenchen Yan1, Yori Endo2, Bobin Mi1, Guohui Liu1.   

Abstract

The roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and micro RNAs (miRNAs) as regulators of mRNA expression in various diseases have recently been reported. Osteoblast differentiation is the vital process which mediates bone formation and fracture healing. In present study, we found microRNA-6979-5p (miR-6979-5p) to be the most differentially expressed miRNA between normal bone and calluses of mice, and overexpression of miR-6979-5p was negatively associated with osteoblast differentiation. Through luciferase assays, we found evidence that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) is a miR-6979-5p target gene that positively regulates osteoblast differentiation. We further identified the lncRNA Rhno1 as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) of miR-6979-5p, and we verified that it was able to influence osteoblast differentiation both in vitro and in vivo. In summary, our data indicates that the lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 axis is a significant regulatory mechanism controlling osteoblast differentiation, and it may thus offer a novel therapeutic strategy for fracture healing. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMP2; Fracture; LncRNA; mRNA; miRNA

Year:  2020        PMID: 32226305      PMCID: PMC7097916          DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.38930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1449-2288            Impact factor:   6.580


Introduction

Fracture healing is a complex physiological process that occurs in individuals after injury, and osteoblast differentiation is a vital component of this process 1,2. Previous studies have suggested that osteogenic differentiation is triggered via the up- or down-regulation of hormones and growth factors that ultimately modulate osteoblast differentiation and proliferation 3-5. For example, orexin signals through orexin receptor 2 in the brain to enhance bone formation, and exerts opposing regulatory roles in the context of osteoporosis 6. Similarly, targeting integrins had been reported to be a potential therapeutic strategy for counteracting bone loss 7. In recent years, there has been increasing research regarding the field of osteoblast differentiation, and specifically of the regulatory roles of the lncRNA/miRNA/mRNA axis in this process 8-10. LncRNAs are long RNAs that lack coding ability, but which are transcribed and processed 11,12. There is now clear evidence that many lncRNAs play a critical role in regulation of gene expression via transcriptional or post-transcriptional mechanisms, and thereby participate in physiological and pathological processes 13,14. lncRNAs have also been reported to function as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), binding to specific miRNA response elements to effectively sequester specific miRNAs, thereby regulating processes such as osteogenic-related gene expression 15. This strategy effectively prevents miRNAs from binding to their target mRNA molecules, which they are normally able to repress the translation of in a highly specific manner via binding to their 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) 16. This lncRNA/miRNA/mRNA axis had been reported to widely exist in various disease contexts, but there is limited research regarding how this axis functions in the context of osteogenic differentiation, making the investigation of these functions and the underlying molecular mechanisms an important research pursuit. Rhno1 (aka RHINO, RAD9-Hus1-Rad1 Interacting Nuclear Orphan) was reported as a factor to DNA damage checkpoint signaling, which physically couples the 9-1-1 (RAD9-HUS1-RAD1) checkpoint clamp to DNA Topoisomerase II Binding Protein 1 17. Ensemble mirror database (http://useast.ensembl.org) was used to search for the details of Rhno1. The results showed that Rhno1 have a lot of transcript ID and many of them have the ability of protein coding. However, a non-coding transcript ID (ENSMUST00000132604.1) named Rhno1-204 can also be found in this database. Thus, in the present research, we used this transcript ID as lncRNA Rhno1 and explore the association between lncRNA Rhno1 and osteoblast differentiation. From literature reviewing, few studies concerning miR-6979-5p, we then search for the miRBase database (www.mirbase.org) to get the more details of miR-6979-5p and the results indicated that the accession number of miR-6979-5p is MI0022827, and the sequence is: GGGGAGGCGCAGAGACUGAGCUGCUCAGUGCGCGCUUGUGUCUGUCUGGCUCCCAG. BMP2, as a significant member in the transforming growth factor-β family, has demonstrated a regulatory role in the formation of cartilage 18. Furthermore, previous research reported that BMP2 can accelerate fracture healing by stimulating the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into osteoblasts 19. Additionally, it is shown that BMP2 can induce the osteoclast activity and the remodeling process of fracture healing 20. And a recent study reported that the expression of BMP2 was significantly decreased in patients with bone none union compared with fracture healing patients 21. Therefore, BMP2 is a key target gene for fracture healing and the formation of callus. We aimed to investigate the ability of the lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 axis to regulate osteoblast differentiation in vivo and in vitro. We found that miR-6979-5p exerts a negative effect on osteoblast differentiation via directly targeting BMP2, and local injection of miR-6979-5p into fracture sites was able to counteract fracture healing. Furthermore, lncRNA Rhno1 was able to promote osteoblast differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells via serving as a miR-6979-5p ceRNA, and local injection of lncRNA Rhno1 was able to enhance fracture healing in vivo. This is the first report to our knowledge to demonstrate the role of the lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 axis in osteoblast differentiation, and to outline the underlying mechanisms.

Materials and Methods

Animal fracture models

The Animal Research Committee of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology approved all study experiments. Male C57BL/6J mice (age: 6 weeks) from the Center of Experimental Animal, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology were used for all experiments, with anesthesia conducted using 10% chloral hydrate (300mg/kg body weight). A longitudinal incision was made, and then blunt separation of the underlying muscles was performed to produce a murine femoral fracture model. Subsequently, we used a diamond disk to cut the femur in order to produce a transverse osteotomy in the mid-diaphysis region. All fractures were then stabilized using 23-gauge intramedullary needles. After 14 days, half of the mice were euthanized, and the calluses at the fracture location were harvested for subsequent analysis. Similarly, the calluses of remaining mice were harvested for subsequent analysis on day 21 post injury.

Imaging of small animals in vivo

We performed small animal imaging at the Central laboratory of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan Union Hospital; http://www.whuh.com/). On days 0, 4, 7, 10, and 14; post-local direct 100µl injections of 200 µM Cy3-labled agomiR-6979-5p were made (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). At 15 min post-injection, 200 µL of 1% chloral hydrate solution was used for anesthetization and were imaged using an In-Vivo FX PRO imaging system (BRUKER, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a 1-minute exposure time.

Radiographic images

On days 7, 14, and 21 post-injury, all animals were given X-rays using an In-Vivo FX PRO imaging system (BRUKER, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a 10 second exposure time.

micro-CT analysis

The fracture site was scanned using a BRUKER SkyScan 1176 scanner micro-CT system (BRUKER, Karlsruhe, Germany) to provide images at 2400 views, 5 frames/view, 37 kV, and 121mA, and three-dimensional images were rendered and evaluated using CT-Vox 2.1 (BRUKER Minimal Intensity Projection Software, Karlsruhe, Germany). Soft tissues were cleaned thoroughly. After scanning, calluses were preserved at -80°C for miRNA or protein extraction for qRT-PCR and western blotting, respectively. Parameters measured were measured by CT Analyser, Version: 1.15.4.0 evaluation software, as follows: bone volume (BV), total volume (TV), BV/TV, and bone mineral density (BMD).

Cell cultures and transfection

MC3T3-E1 cells were grown in DMEM/F12 media (Hyclone, UT, USA, #SH30023.01B) with 10% FBS (Gibco, GI, USA, #10099141) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Hyclone, UT, USA, #SV30010). Transfection of agomiR-6979-5p, agomiR-NC, antagomiR-6979-5p, antagomiR-NC, lncRNA Rhno1, silncRNA Rhno1, and siRNA-NC (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) at 200uM was conducted using Lipofectamine 3000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA, #L3000001) based on provided directions. Lipofectamine 3000 was also used to transfect cells with miRNAs or siRNA oligos. BMP2 siRNA, silncRNA Rhno1, and siRNA-NC (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) were transfected at 50 nM.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

qRT-PCR was performed as in previous studies 42. Trizol (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA, #L15596026) was used for total RNA extraction, after which a qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) was used for cDNA synthesis. The 2-ΔΔCt method was used for relative gene expression quantification, with GAPDH and U6 used to normalize mRNA and miRNA expression. Primers are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

miRNAs, lncRNAs, and mRNA primer sequence

microRNAs or gene namePrimer sequence
Mmu - miR - 6979 - 5p - ForwardACACTCCAGCTGGGGGGGAGGCGCAGAG
Mmu - miR - 6979 - 5p - ReverseTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG
Mmu - lncRNA - Rhno1 - ForwardCTATGAGACAGGAGGCAGGGT
Mmu - lncRNA - Rhno1 - ReverseAATGTGAGGCCCTTTTGTCTCA
U6-ForwardCTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA
U6-ReverseAACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT
Mmu - BMP2 - ForwardGACATCCTGAGCGAGTTCGA
Mmu - BMP2 - ReverseCACTTGTTTCTGGCAGTTCTTC
Mmu - ALP - ForwardTGACTACCACTCGGGTGAACC
Mmu - ALP - ReverseTGATATGCGATGTCCTTGCAG
Mmu - COL1A1 - ForwardCTGACTGGAAGAGCGGAGAG
Mmu - COL1A1 - ReverseCGGCTGAGTAGGGAACACAC
Mmu - OCN - ForwardTTCTGCTCACTCTGCTGACCC
Mmu - OCN - ReverseCTGATAGCTCGTCACAAGCAGG
Mmu - Runx2 - ForwardCGCCACCACTCACTACCACAC
Mmu - Runx2 - ReverseTGGATTTAATAGCGTGCTGCC
Mmu - GAPDH - ForwardAGAGTGTTTCCTCGTCCCG
Mmu - GAPDH - ReverseCCGTTGAATTTGCCGTGA

Western blotting

NETN buffer (20 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 0.5% Nonidet P-40) was used to prepare cell lysates, which were separated via SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. These were then blocked using 5% skim milk, and probed at 4°C overnight using primary antibodies, after which appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Aspen, Johannesburg, South Africa, #AS1058) were used for antigen detection. A chemiluminescence detection system (Canon, Tokyo, Japan, #LiDE110) was used to visualize protein based on provided directions. Antibodies used were as follows: anti-collagen I (1:500, Abcam, MA, USA, #ab34710), anti-ALP (1:1,000, Abcam, MA, USA, #ab95462), anti-Osteocalcin (1:500, Abcam, MA, USA, #ab93876), anti-RunX2 (1:500, Abcam, MA, USA, #ab23981), anti-BMP2 (1:2,000, CST, MA, USA), and anti-GAPDH (1:10,000, Abcam, MA, USA, #ab37168).

Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Staining

A BCIP/NBT alkaline phosphatase color development kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China, #C3206) used based on provided directions to assess ALP staining. Samples were washed twice in PBS, and then fixed with 10% formalin for 15 minutes. The BCIP/NBT liquid substrate was then applied to cells for 24 h. Samples were prepared in the dark at room temperature. Color change was obtained under a charge-coupled device (CCD) microscope, and a scanner (EPSON V600, Nagano prefecture, Japan) was used for imaging. Samples were analyzed in triplicate.

Alizarin Red Staining

MC3T3-E1 cells were grown in osteogenic whole-media (Cyagen, Guangzhou, China, #HUXMA-90021) in 6-well plates to induce osteoblast mineralization. Cells were fixed with 10% formalin for 15 minutes, after which cells were washed using PBS and stained using 1 mL 0.5% alizarin red staining solution at room temperature for 15 min. Cells were then rinsed with distilled water for 5 minutes while shaking, and red mineralized nodules were assessed via CCD microscope and imaged (EPSON V600, Nagano prefecture, Japan). All experiments were repeated three times.

Luciferase Reporter Assay

MC3T3-E1 cells were plated in 24-well plates and transfected using a dual-luciferase vector (BMP2 WT, BMP2 Mut, lncRNA Rhno1 WT and lncRNA Rhno1 Mut) as well as either miR-6979-5p mimics or negative control (NC mimics). Following a 24 h incubation, the dualluciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Wisconsin, USA) was utilized as a means of measuring luciferase activity.

RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) experiments

An RIP RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, #17-701) was used for RIP assays based on provided directions. Briefly, RIP lysis buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China, #N8031) was used for MC3T3-E1 cell lysis, and lysates were combined with either anti-Argonaute2 (anti-Ago2) or anti-IgG control overnight at 4°C. Proteinase K was then used for sample treatment, and immunoprecipitated RNA was collected and analyzed via qRT-PCR.

RNA-pull down assay

The Biotin RNA Labeling Mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland, #11685597910) was used to labled isolated RNAs, while the T7 RNA polymerase (Ambion Life, TX, USA) was used for in vitro transcription. An RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Munich, Germany, #74134) together with DNase I (Qiagen, Munich, Germany, #19101) was used for RNA purification. Cell lysates were then mixed together with these RNAs (positive control, negative control, or biotinylated), and magnetic beads were added to all samples followed by a room temperature incubation. Bead-bound RNA complexed were then eluted and extracted, after which RNA was analyzed via qRT-PCR.

RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization

Cy3-labeled-lncRNA Rhno1 (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) and DAPI-labeled U6 probes (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) were designed and synthesized. A FISH kit was used for RNA-FISH experiments based on provided protocols (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA, #F32954).

Histological analysis

Following decalcification, 7 µm thick paraffin-embedded tissue samples were prepared and subjected to hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Alcian blue staining. Sections were then imaged and measured with an Olympus BX51 microscope and a DP73 CCD Olympus Imaging System (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo).

Statistical analysis

Data are means ± SD, and GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, CA) was used for all analyses unless otherwise noted. Three or more samples were compared via a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test, while two-tailed Student's tests were used to compare two groups. P < 0.05 was the threshold of significance.

Results

MiR-6979-5p inhibits fracture healing in vivo

To explore how miR-6979-5p affects fracture healing, we measured the relative levels of miR-6979-5p in fracture gene chips (Figure . In addition, we generated a murine fracture model, and calluses from fracture sites were harvested to measure miR-6979-5p levels during early fracture healing stages (days 1 to 21) (Figure , revealing this levels to be markedly decreased during this early healing period. Next, mice were divided randomly into two groups (control group and agomiR-6979-5p group), with agomiR-6979-5p animals receiving local direct injections of Cy3-labeled miR-6979-5p at the fracture sites on day 0, day 4, and day 7 post-injury, after which miR-6979-5p levels in fracture sites were assessed via in vivo imaging in these animals (Figure On days 4, 7, 14 and 21 post-injury, 3 mice in each group were euthanatized and calluses were collected from the fracture sites to measure the level of miR-6979-5p and, as shown in Figure miR-6979-5p levels were higher in mice administered agomiR-6979-5p than in control animals at both of these time points. All animals were also assessed via X-rays and micro-CT examinations during the fracture healing process, and those animals treated with agomiR-6979-5p exhibited a smaller callus volume and a larger fracture gap relative to control animals (Figure Additionally, micro-CT scanning datas indicated the presence of a smaller total and bone callus volume in agomiR-6979-5p-treated animals than in control animals on post-fracture days 14 and 21 (Figure Moreover, H&E/Alcian-blue staining results revealed a reduced bone area and increased cartilage area at the fracture junction in the agomiR-6979-5p group, suggesting less bone remodeling for these animals (Figure These results indicated that miR-6979-5p may negatively regulate the fracture healing process.

MiR-6979-5p negatively regulates in vitro osteoblast differentiation

We next explored how miR-6979-5p affects osteogenic differentiation in vitro. MC3T3-E1 cells were transfected with lipofectamine 3000 alone, or together with an antagomiR-negative control (antagomiR-NC), antagomiR-6979-5p, agomiR-negative control (agomiR-NC), or agomiR-6979-5p. Overexpression of miR-6979-5p was evident in the agomiR-6979-5p group by PCR analysis (Figure . Next, expression of collagen I, ALP, OCN, and RunX2, which are osteogenic genes, were measured among the five groups via western blotting. As shown in Figure , higher mRNA levels of relative osteogenic genes were detectable in the antagomiR-6979-5p group than in the other experimental groups. Furthermore, we found overexpression of miR-6979-5p reduced ALP activity and staining, whereas knockdown of miR-6979-5p via antagomiR-6979-5p transfection enhanced ALP activity and staining (Figure . In addition, to assess whether miR-6979-5p stimulates or suppresses extracellular matrix mineralization, cells were continuously cultured for 21 days, after which we observed reduced mineral deposition in agomiR-6979-5p-transfected cells relative to antagomiR-6979-5p-transfected cells (Figure . These data indicated that miR-6979-5p inhibits the osteoblast differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells.

MiR-6979-5p regulates osteogenic differentiation via directly targeting BMP2

We next sought to explore miR-6979-5p downstream targets via screening miRDB datasets, Targetscan datasets, and GEO datasets for potential targets. we combined the results of the above three databases to enhance the strength of the evidence, and in order to show the process of the method of selecting target gene more clearly, we produced a Venn diagram and as shown in Figure 3A, three candidate genes were identified of interest - PI3KR1, BMP2, and LRP5. Following a literature review, although LRP5 is involved in Wnt/LRP5/β-Catenin signaling pathway, and thereby mediate the osteoblast differentiation process 22, BMP2 is a osteogenic mediator demonstrated widely in much more previous researches 23-25. Thus, we select BMP2 from the three candidates as a target gene for miR-6979-5p. We next assessed whether miR-6979-5p directly targets BMP2, using either wild-type (WT) BMP2 3′ UTR or mutated (Mut) BMP2 3' UTR constructs fused to luciferase reporters. With these constructs, we found that agomiR-6979-5p substantially attenuated WT BMP2 3′ UTR reporter activity (Figure , whereas it failed to influence the activity of the mutated 3′ UTR BMP2 reporter (Figure . Furthermore, BMP2 mRNA levels in fracture calluses were measured over a 21 day post-injury period, revealing an apparent increase in expression over time (Figure To assess changes in BMP2 mRNA levels during the early stages of fracture healing in vivo, calluses samples from both animal groups were collected on days 4, 7, 14, and 21 for PCR analysis. Lower BMP2 expression was evidence in agomiR-6979-5p-treated animals relative to control animals at each time point (Figure . Similarly, fracture calluses were collected from both animal groups on days 14 and 21 for western blotting, and the results indicated that BMP2 expression was significant lower in the agomiR-6979-5p group relative to controls (Figure . Next, MC3T3-E1 cells were transfected using either agomiR or antagomiR constructs as above, and BMP2 mRNA expression was assessed via PCR and western blotting. As shown in Figure , higher BMP2 mRNA levels were evident in the antagomiR-6979-5p group relative to other experimental groups. Additionally, to explore whether osteoblast differentiation is BMP2-dependent, we next tested whether antagomiR-6979-5p was able to rescue the negative effects of siRNA-BMP2 on osteogenic differentiation. Western blotting indicated that antagomiR-6979-5p was able to restore BMP2-dependent osteogenesis-associated gene expression (collagen I, ALP, OCN, and Runx2) (Figure . Moreover, we found overexpression of BMP induced ALP activity and staining, whereas antagomiR-6979-5p was able to restore the effect of BMP2 on ALP activity and staining (Figure . To observe whether miR-6979-5p stimulates or suppresses extracellular matrix mineralization, cells were next continuously cultured for 21 days, and we observed reduced mineral deposition in siBMP2-transfected cells relative to the antagomiR-6979-5p+siRNA-NC group (Figure . Collectively, these results indicated miR-6979-5p directly targets the BMP2 3' UTR in the context of osteogenic differentiation.
Figure 3

BMP2 is a miR-6979-5p target gene. Three genes (PI3KR1, BMP2, and LRP5) were selected as potential targets of miR-6979-5p. (B) AgomiR-6979-5p substantially attenuated WT BMP2 3' UTR reporter activity. (C) No significant differential activity of the mutated 3' UTR BMP2 reporter was evident between groups. (D) Elevated levels of BMP2 in calluses of fracture model animals were detectable at the early stage of fracture healing (days 1 to 21). (E) Lower BMP2 mRNA levels in calluses samples were detected by qRT-PCR analysis in agomiR-6979-5p-treated animals than in those in the other groups at time day points (days 4, 7, 14, and 21). (F) Western blotting of BMP2 in calluses samples between the two groups on day 14 and day 21. (G) qRT-PCR analysis of BMP2 mRNA levels in the five transfected groups (Control group, agomiR-NC group, agomiR-6979-5p group, antagomiR-NC group, and antagomiR-6979-5p). (H) Western blotting analysis of BMP2 mRNA levels in (G). (I) Western blotting of collagen I, ALP, OCN, and Runx2 mRNA levels in five groups (Control group, siRNA-NC, siRNA-BMP2 group, agomiR-6979-5p+siRNA-BMP2, and agomiR-6979-5p+siRNA-NC group). ALP staining (J) and alizarin red-mediated calcium staining (K) results in (A). Scale bar, 100 µm. Data are means ± SD of triplicate experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

LncRNA Rhno1 serves to sequester miR-6979-5p

Next, to further elucidate the upstream regulatory mechanisms of miR-6979-5p, we searched the LncBase Experimental V.2 Database to identify its putative regulators, and a possible interaction between the lncRNA Rhno1 and miR-6979-5p was found. Consistent with this, in fracture animal models we found the level of lncRNA Rhno1 to trend upwards during the early stages of fracture healing (day 1 to 21 post-injury) (Figure Next, we assessed lncRNA Rhno1 localization in MC3T3-E1 cells via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), revealing that lncRNA Rhno1 is localized mainly in the cytoplasm of MC3T3-E1 cells (Figure Furthermore, FISH assays were used to assess lncRNA Rhno1 localization in bone or calluses among animal models on days 0, 7, 14 post-injury, which suggesting lncRNA Rhno1 is localized mainly in the cytoplasm of bone tissues or calluses (Figure Moreover, using StarBase v2.0 (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/starbase2/mirLncRNA.php), we were able to identify the site of interaction between lncRNA Rhno1 and miR-6979-5p as shown in Figure A luciferase reporter gene assay was next conducted, and results in Figure confirmed that the lncRNA Rhno1 directly bound to miR-6979-5p in MC3T3-E1 cells. To further validate the association between lncRNA Rhno1 and miR-6979-5p, MC3T3-E1 cells were next transfected with lipofectamine 3000 either alone, or together with silncRNA control (silncRNA-NC), or silncRNA Rhno1, and after a 48 hours cell culture period miR-6979-5p levels were measured by qRT-PCR analysis. This led miR-6979-5p levels in the silncRNA Rhno1-treated cells to be significantly higher than in the other experimental groups (Figure . Similarly, the lncRNA Rhno1 levels were much higher in the antagomiR-6979-5p group than other groups, especially relative to the agomiR-6979-5p group (Figure . Furthermore, the interaction between lncRNA Rhno1 and miR-6979-5p was further demonstrated via an RNA RIP assay, which revealed that lncRNA Rhno1 increased Ago2-containing miRNA ribonucleoprotein complex enrichment than when mixed with samples imunoprecipitated using control IgG (Figure . Consistent with this, a pull-down assay provided evidence that lncRNA Rhno1 was readily bound by biomiR-6979-5p (Figure , but not by a mutated isoform of this bio-miR-6979-5p. Collectively, these results suggest that lncRNA Rhno1 may serve as a ceRNA that functions as a molecular sponge to sequester miR-6979-5p.

LncRNA Rhno1 promotes in vitro osteoblast differentiation

To explore how the lncRNA Rhno1 influences osteogenic differentiation, MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with lipofectamine 3000 alone, or together with lncRNA Rhno1, silncRNA-NC, or silncRNA Rhno1 (Figure After continuous culture for 48 hours, overexpression of lncRNA Rhno1 and BMP2 was then detectable in lncRNA Rhno1-transfected cells by qRT-PCR analysis (Figure The results of western blotting analyses of BMP2 levels in these four groups were also consistent with the qRT-PCR results (Figure Consistent with these changes, we found that the expression of genes involved in osteoblast differentiation, such as collagen I, ALP, OCN, and RunX2, were elevated in the lncRNA Rhno1 group relative to the other groups (Figure . In addition, overexpression of lncRNA Rhno1 induced ALP activity and staining, whereas lncRNA Rhno1 silencing attenuated ALP activity and staining (Figure . Moreover, to observe the effect of lncRNA Rhno1 on extracellular matrix mineralization, cells were continuously cultured for 21 days, after which we observed more mineral deposition in lncRNA Rhno1-transfected cells (Figure . This indicates that lncRNA Rhno1 enhances the expression of BMP2 and exerts a positive role during osteogenic differentiation.

LncRNA Rhno1 accelerates fracture healing in vivo

To evaluate the effects of lncRNA Rhno1 on fracture healing, fracture model mice were locally injected with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), lncRNA Rhno1, or an equal volume of silncRNA Rhno1 in the fracture sites on days 0, 4, and 7 after surgery. X rays and CT examinations were performed to assess the process of fracture healing. Mice treated with lncRNA Rhno1 exhibited a larger callus volume and smaller fracture gap relative to control animals (Figure . In addition, a larger total and bone callus volume was evident in lncRNA Rhno1-treated animals relative to other groups on post-fracture days 14 and 21, whereas silncRNA Rhno1-treated animals had the smallest total and bone callus volume among the three groups (Figure . Furthermore, on days 14 and 21 post micro-CT scanning, 3 mice from each group were euthanatized and calluses were collected to measure the levels of miR-6979-5p, BMP2, and lncRNA Rhno1, and as shown in Figure , the level of miR-6979-5p decreased in lncRNA Rhno1-treated animals, whereas the levels of BMP2 and lncRNA Rhno1 increased. Moreover, H&E/Alcian-blue staining results revealed a reduced cartilage area and increased bone area at the fracture junction in the lncRNA Rhno1 group, suggesting more bone remodeling for these animals (Figure . In summary, these data suggest that lncRNA Rhno1 downregulates miR-6979-5p and induces the expression of BMP2, thereby promoting fracture healing in vivo.

Discussion

This study provides the first verification that local injection of lncRNA Rhno1 into murine fracture sites induces a prominent regenerative effect on the bone and its micro-architecture, as evidenced by more rapid healing and larger callus volumes in treated animals. We further found in vitro that lncRNA Rhno1 could serve as a ceRNA for miR-6979-5p, thereby counteracting the negative effects of miR-6979-5p on osteoblast differentiation and fracture healing. Moreover, we explored miR-6979-5p downstream targets, revealing BMP2 to be a relevant target gene for this miRNA. Thus, as shown in Figure , our results suggest that lncRNA Rhno1 may induce osteoblast differentiation by competitively binding miR-6979-5p to upregulate BMP2 mRNA levels, and thus lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 axis plays a significant role in the regulation of osteoblast differentiation. In recent decades, miRNAs have been reported to serve as important regulatory factors in the context of osteogenic differentiation, and the underlying mechanisms have been the focus of substantial research 26-29. We therefore sought to identify miRNAs with differential expression between intact control bone and calluses of post-fracture mice, leading to our selection of miR-6979-5p from the GEO database. We found no articles regarding the function of miR-6979-5p in the reported literature, and thus it was necessary to investigate the biological functions of this miRNA. In this study, the effect of miR-6979-5p on fracture healing was investigated in vivo, with the results suggesting that miR-6979-5p inhibits fracture healing, and we were able to confirm this negative impact on osteogenic differentiation using MC3T3-E1 cells. As previous studies 30 have reported miRNAs can bind to target mRNAs to exert specific effects, we subsequently explored the downstream targets of miR-6979-5p using luciferase assays. BMP2, which we confirmed to be a target for miR-6979-5p, is able to stimulate the differentiation of myoblasts into osteoblasts via the EIF2AK3-EIF2A-ATF4 pathway 31. The activation of EIF2AK3 can in turn stimulate phosphorylation of EIF2A, leading to increased ATF4 expression, which plays a central role in osteoblast differentiation 32,33. Indeed, several studies have previously demonstrated that BMP2 plays a regulatory role in various biological processes 34-36. For example, one group found that a BMP activity gradient is essential for normal dorsoventral patterning during gastrulation 37. In our study, we demonstrated that BMP2 is a direct target of miR-6979-5p, and downregulation of miR-6979-5p increases the BMP2 mRNA levels, thereby promoting osteogenesis. In addition, lncRNAs are known to affect disease progression by serving as molecular ceRNA sponges that can sequester miRNAs 38. For example, one group found that the lncRNA AGAP2-AS1 plays a competitive role in hepatocellular carcinoma via acting as a miR-16-5p sponge 39. In present study, we searched for potential upstream regulators of miR-6979-5p using the LncBase Experimental V.2 Database (http://carolina.imis.athena-innovation.gr/diana_tools/web/index.php?r=lncbasev2%2Findex-experimental), leading to our identification of the lncRNA Rhno1. As a growing body of evidence suggests that cytoplasmic lncRNAs can serve as decoys for other noncoding RNAs such as miRNAs 40,41, we determined the localization of this lncRNA Rhno1 via a FISH approach, revealing that lncRNA Rhno1 mainly located in cytoplasm, which is consistent with other published findings. RIP and pull down assays further confirmed the ability of lncRNA Rhno1 and miR-6979-5p to directly interact, thereby providing additional support to our model wherein the lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 axis modulates osteoblast differentiation. There were a number of limitations in the present study. First, it remains to be determined whether more frequent injections of lncRNA Rhno1 can induce similar or much better bone formation effects in fracture mice. Moreover, we were not able to conduct clinical trials regarding the beneficial effects of lncRNA Rhno1 on fracture healing in the present study. In addition, to produce more definitive evidence of the role of the lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 axis in osteogenesis, transgenic mice that specifically lack relevant genes in osteoblast lineages are necessary. Taken together, our results indicate that the lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 axis can effectively modulate the differentiation of osteoblasts; potentially due to the lncRNA Rhno1 serving as a ceRNA that competitively inhibits the expression of miR-6979-5p, thereby elevating BMP2 mRNA levels and promoting osteoblast differentiation. Our findings suggest that the lncRNA Rhno1/miR-6979-5p/BMP2 axis may represent a novel therapeutic target for accelerating fracture healing. Supplementary figure S1. Click here for additional data file.
  42 in total

1.  The effect of timing in the administration of hepatocyte growth factor to modulate BMP-2-induced osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Toshiki Kawasaki; Yasuo Niki; Takeshi Miyamoto; Keisuke Horiuchi; Morio Matsumoto; Mamoru Aizawa; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Lrp4 expression by adipocytes and osteoblasts differentially impacts sclerostin's endocrine effects on body composition and glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Soohyun P Kim; Hao Da; Zhu Li; Priyanka Kushwaha; Conor Beil; Lin Mei; Wen-Cheng Xiong; Michael J Wolfgang; Thomas L Clemens; Ryan C Riddle
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Curcumin induces osteoblast differentiation through mild-endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated such as BMP2 on osteoblast cells.

Authors:  Hyo-Eun Son; Eun-Jung Kim; Won-Gu Jang
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.037

4.  Effect of BMP-2 and/or BMP-9 on preosteoblasts attached to polycaprolactone functionalized by adhesive peptides derived from bone sialoprotein.

Authors:  Olivier Drevelle; Alex Daviau; Marc-Antoine Lauzon; Nathalie Faucheux
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  LncRNA KCNQ1OT1 accelerates fracture healing via modulating miR-701-3p/FGFR3 axis.

Authors:  Lang Chen; Yuan Xiong; Chenchen Yan; Wu Zhou; Yori Endo; Hang Xue; Yiqiang Hu; Liangcong Hu; Xingzhu Leng; Jing Liu; Ze Lin; Bobin Mi; Guohui Liu
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Up-regulation of BMP2/4 signaling increases both osteoblast-specific marker expression and bone marrow adipogenesis in Gja1Jrt/+ stromal cell cultures.

Authors:  Tanya Zappitelli; Frieda Chen; Jane E Aubin
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Targeting cellular senescence prevents age-related bone loss in mice.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Ming Xu; Megan M Weivoda; David G Monroe; Daniel G Fraser; Jennifer L Onken; Brittany A Negley; Jad G Sfeir; Mikolaj B Ogrodnik; Christine M Hachfeld; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Matthew T Drake; Robert J Pignolo; Tamar Pirtskhalava; Tamara Tchkonia; Merry Jo Oursler; James L Kirkland; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  MicroRNA miR-23a cluster promotes osteocyte differentiation by regulating TGF-β signalling in osteoblasts.

Authors:  Huan-Chang Zeng; Yangjin Bae; Brian C Dawson; Yuqing Chen; Terry Bertin; Elda Munivez; Philippe M Campeau; Jianning Tao; Rui Chen; Brendan H Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Long non-coding RNA AGAP2-AS1, functioning as a competitive endogenous RNA, upregulates ANXA11 expression by sponging miR-16-5p and promotes proliferation and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhikui Liu; Yufeng Wang; Liang Wang; Bowen Yao; Liankang Sun; Runkun Liu; Tianxiang Chen; Yongshen Niu; Kangsheng Tu; Qingguang Liu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-14

10.  CircRNA AFF4 promotes osteoblast cells proliferation and inhibits apoptosis via the Mir-7223-5p/PIK3R1 axis.

Authors:  Bobin Mi; Yuan Xiong; Lang Chen; Chenchen Yan; Yori Endo; Yi Liu; Jing Liu; Liangcong Hu; Yiqiang Hu; Yun Sun; Faqi Cao; Wu Zhou; Guohui Liu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.682

View more
  8 in total

1.  YY1-induced DLEU1/miR-149-5p Promotes Malignant Biological Behavior of Cholangiocarcinoma through Upregulating YAP1/TEAD2/SOX2.

Authors:  Jinglin Li; Xingming Jiang; Yi Xu; Pengcheng Kang; Peng Huang; Nanfeng Meng; Hang Wang; Wangyang Zheng; Hao Wang; Zhidong Wang; Xiangyu Zhong; Yunfu Cui
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 10.750

2.  SARS-CoV-2-induced Overexpression of miR-4485 Suppresses Osteogenic Differentiation and Impairs Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Bobin Mi; Yuan Xiong; Chenming Zhang; Wu Zhou; Lang Chen; Faqi Cao; Fenghua Chen; Zhi Geng; Adriana C Panayi; Yun Sun; Lin Wang; Guohui Liu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.580

3.  Tanshinone Ameliorates Glucocorticoid-Induced Bone Loss via Activation of AKT1 Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Yanjun Wang; Lin Liu; Zechao Qu; Dong Wang; Wangli Huang; Lingbo Kong; Liang Yan
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 4.  The Regulatory Role of Ferroptosis in Bone Homeostasis.

Authors:  Yuan Xiong; Lang Chen; Ze Lin; Yiqiang Hu; Adriana C Panayi; Wu Zhou; Yun Sun; Faqi Cao; Guodong Liu; Guangdong Dai; Bobin Mi; Guohui Liu
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.131

5.  The Long Noncoding Transcript HNSCAT1 Activates KRT80 and Triggers Therapeutic Efficacy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yixuan Zhao; Xin Huang; Zewei Zhang; Haizhou Li; Tao Zan
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 7.310

Review 6.  MicroRNA-loaded biomaterials for osteogenesis.

Authors:  Jingwei Wang; Yutao Cui; He Liu; Shaorong Li; Shouye Sun; Hang Xu; Chuangang Peng; Yanbing Wang; Dankai Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-19

Review 7.  Long Noncoding RNAs: Recent Insights into Their Role in Male Infertility and Their Potential as Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Shanjiang Zhao; Nuo Heng; Bahlibi Weldegebriall Sahlu; Huan Wang; Huabin Zhu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Inhibition of exosomal miR-24-3p in diabetes restores angiogenesis and facilitates wound repair via targeting PIK3R3.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Liu Ouyang; Lei He; Yanzhen Qu; Yu Han; Deyu Duan
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.