| Literature DB >> 32226209 |
Aleksandra Zgrundo1, Barbara Wojtasik2, Peter Convey3, Roksana Majewska4,5.
Abstract
As High Arctic environments are particularly sensitive to global and regional climate changes, a growing number of studies have focused on that region. It has been shown that living and fossil diatoms can be successfully used to track environmental changes in polar habitats. Nevertheless, the diatom flora of many Arctic areas remains unknown. The present study set out to examine the diatom flora in the rarely visited and near-pristine zone of northern Spitsbergen. Examination by light and scanning electron microscopy of 25 sediment samples, collected in fjords, tidal plains and lakes, indicated significant differences between the diatom assemblages identified in lakes located within different fjord watersheds. Altogether, 96 diatom taxa (46 genera) were found. The most abundant species (Achnanthidium minutissimum, Staurosirella pinnata and Nitzschia alpina) occurred in at least eight of the 11 investigated lakes. Assemblages from the Woodfjorden region were characterized by the presence of Cavinula pseudoscutiformis and Encyonema reichardtii, along with Navicula spp., which coincided with relatively low conductivity (34-58.7 µS cm-1) and near-neutral pH (7.2-7.5). Diatom assemblages found in the Wijdefjorden area were typically characterized by Denticula kuetzingii and Nitzschia inconspicua, with these lakes generally having higher water conductivity (>184 µS cm-1) and pH (7.5-8.1) conditions. Conductivity, biogenic silica concentration and water temperature were indicated as significant predictors of diatom community species composition and structure. No diatom frustules were found in fjord and tidal plain sediments. The effects of selected environmental factors on diatom assemblage formation are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Diatom absence; Diatom assemblages; Frustule dissolution; Lakes; Polar; Sediment analysis
Year: 2016 PMID: 32226209 PMCID: PMC7089652 DOI: 10.1007/s00300-016-2014-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polar Biol ISSN: 0722-4060 Impact factor: 2.310
Fig. 1Study area and sampling stations
Geographical positions of sampling stations and selected environmental characteristics
| Location | Site | Date of sampling | Latitude φ N | Longitude λ E | Depth (m) | Temperature (°C) | Conductivity (µS cm−1) | Salinity PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fjords | I 1 | 22.07.2005 | 78°54.40′ | 16°24.60′ | 16 | 2.7 | – | 32 |
| I 2 | 22.07.2005 | 79°00.40′ | 16°19.10′ | 60 | 2.1 | – | 29.3 | |
| I 3 | 22.07.2005 | 79°05.00′ | 16°05.00′ | 60 | 3.6 | – | 29.9 | |
| I 4 | 22.07.2005 | 79°10.40′ | 15°49.30′ | 56 | 3.3 | – | 31.4 | |
| I 5 | 23.07.2005 | 79°15.00′ | 15°44.00′ | 76 | 1.3 | – | 29.9 | |
| I 6 | 23.07.2005 | 79°20.10′ | 15°42.90′ | 101 | 2.2 | – | 34.9 | |
| I 7 | 24.07.2005 | 79°38.40′ | 15°45.30′ | 16 | 4.6 | – | 34.6 | |
| II 1 | 26.07.2005 | 79°27.30′ | 13°22.90′ | 54 | 2.8 | – | 34.8 | |
| III 1 | 26.07.2005 | 79°18.80′ | 13°53.60′ | 44 | 1.2 | – | 30.5 | |
| III 2 | 26.07.2005 | 79°23.60′ | 13°54.00′ | 75 | 4.4 | – | 31.7 | |
| Tidal plains | TP I 1 | 22.07.2005 | 79°06.08′ | 15°38.64′ | 0.3 | 4.2 | – | 6.6 |
| TP I 2 | 22.07.2005 | 79°06.05′ | 15°39.91′ | 0.3 | 4.6 | – | 0.5 | |
| TP I 3 | 22.07.2005 | 79°06.06′ | 15°40.98′ | 0.3 | 4.5 | – | 3.7 | |
| TP I 4 | 22.07.2005 | 79°06.05′ | 15°41.18′ | 0.3 | 3.0 | – | 0 | |
| Lakes | L III 1 | 27.07.2005 | 79°40.33′ | 14°15.40′ | 0.3 | 7.8 | 34 | 0 |
| L III 2 | 27.07.2005 | 79°40.39′ | 14°15.07′ | 0.3 | 8.9 | 34.1 | 0 | |
| L III 3 | 27.07.2005 | 79°40.90′ | 14°13.38′ | 0.3 | 6.9 | 35.3 | 0 | |
| L III 4 | 27.07.2005 | 79°40.66′ | 14°12.15′ | 0.3 | 8.6 | 48.1 | 0 | |
| L III 5 | 27.07.2005 | 79°40.57′ | 14°12.06′ | 0.3 | 9.7 | 58.7 | 0 | |
| L III 6 | 27.07.2005 | 79°40.53′ | 14°11.92′ | 0.3 | 7.7 | 1729 | 0.7 | |
| L IV 1 | 28.07.2005 | 79°43.58′ | 14°24.12′ | 0.3 | 6.2 | 58.2 | 0 | |
| L V 1 | 29.07.2005 | 79°48.18′ | 15°40.01′ | 0.3 | 3.2 | 28.9 | 0 | |
| L V 2 | 29.07.2005 | 79°48.20′ | 15°37.87′ | 0.3 | 7.1 | 191.6 | 0 | |
| L V 3 | 29.07.2005 | 79°48.14′ | 15°37.56′ | 0.3 | 7.1 | 184.4 | 0 | |
| L VI 1 | 30.07.2005 | 79°43.11′ | 14°53.12′ | 0.3 | 6.8 | 1227 | 0.4 |
Description of the investigated lakes
| LIII1 | LIII2 | LIII3 | LIII4 | LIII5 | LIII6 | LIV1 | LV1 | LV2 | LV3 | LVI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation a.s.l. (m) | 57 | 57 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 5 |
| Size (ha) | 1.2 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 129 | 812 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 214 |
| Max depth (m) | 3.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | ≥33.8 | ≥65 | 0.2 | 0.1 | ≥22.6 |
| Distance from the coast (m) | 300 | 300 | 100 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 300 | 800 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Vegetation cover | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Tundra plant cover | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Inflows | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Incidental sea water inflows | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Outflow to the sea | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Snow in the catchment | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Glaciated landscape | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Strandflat landscape | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Type of surface sediments | Mud | Mud | Sand | Mud | Mud | Muddy sand | Mud | Gravelly sand | Sandy mud | Sand | Gravelly sand |
| Detritus in sediments | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Fig. 2Loss on ignition (LOI) values for the sampling stations within the fjords, tidal plains and lakes in northern Spitsbergen in July 2005
Fig. 3Organic carbon content in the surface sediments in fjords, tidal plains and lakes in northern Spitsbergen in July 2005
Fig. 4Biogenic silica content in the surface sediments in fjords, tidal plains and lakes in northern Spitsbergen in July 2005
Fig. 5C:N molar ratio calculated for the surface sediments collected from fjords, tidal plains and lakes in northern Spitsbergen in July 2005
List of taxa with summary statistics: number of occurrences (N), maximum percentage value attained, lake with the maximum value and number of lakes where the taxon attained a value of 5 % or more
| Taxa | Code |
| Max abundance | >5 % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Lake | |||||
| 1. |
| Ach pun | 1 | 20.7 | III6 | 1 |
| 2. |
| Ach hel | 2 | 18.8 | V1 | 2 |
| 3. |
| Ach min | 11 | 75.0 | V1 | 6 |
| 4. |
| Alv bey | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 5. |
| Cal bac | 2 | 3.9 | III4 | 0 |
| 6. |
| Cal sil | 1 | 3.5 | III5 | 0 |
| 7. |
| Cav coc | 1 | 0.2 | III2 | 0 |
| 8. |
| Cav pse | 5 | 3.5 | III3 | 0 |
| 9. |
| Cha soe | 2 | 0.6 | VI1 | 0 |
| 10. |
| Cos pus | 1 | 0.4 | V3 | 0 |
| 11. |
| Cra hal | 1 | 1.7 | VI1 | 0 |
| 12. |
| Cym des | 1 | 0.4 | V2 | 0 |
| 13. |
| Cym cus | 2 | 0.2 | V2 | 0 |
| 14. |
| Cym nav | 2 | 0.7 | III5 | 0 |
| 15. |
| Cym tyn | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 16. |
| Den kue | 3 | 21.6 | V2 | 2 |
| 17. |
| Dia gal | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 18. |
| Dia sp | 2 | 3.0 | III6 | 0 |
| 19. |
| Dia ten | 2 | 0.9 | V1 | 0 |
| 20. |
| Dip ova | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 21. |
| Enc min | 7 | 4.0 | VI1 | 0 |
| 22. |
| Enc rei | 3 | 2.7 | III1 | 0 |
| 23. |
| Enc sil | 1 | 1.0 | III3 | 0 |
| 24. |
| Enc mic | 3 | 1.8 | III5 | 0 |
| 25. |
| Euc fle | 2 | 0.6 | VI1 | 0 |
| 26. |
| Euc lae | 2 | 3.4 | VI1 | 0 |
| 27. |
| Eun gru | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 28. |
| Eun inc | 3 | 0.9 | V2 | 0 |
| 29. |
| Eun pap | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 30. |
| Eun pra | 2 | 0.9 | V1 | 0 |
| 31. |
| Fra cap | 4 | 8.9 | III3 | 1 |
| 32. |
| Fra cvr | 1 | 0.2 | III1 | 0 |
| 33. |
| Gom can | 2 | 0.7 | III5 | 0 |
| 34. |
| Gom car | 2 | 0.2 | III5 | 0 |
| 35. |
| Gom tru | 1 | 0.6 | VI1 | 0 |
| 36. |
| Han ant | 1 | 0.4 | V2 | 0 |
| 37. |
| Han arc | 1 | 0.2 | VI1 | 0 |
| 38. |
| Han sp | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 39. |
| Hum bre | 1 | 1.6 | V3 | 0 |
| 40. |
| Hum con | 3 | 0.9 | V1 | 0 |
| 41. |
| Hum per | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 42. |
| Hyg bal | 5 | 2.7 | V3 | 0 |
| 43. |
| Kar cle | 2 | 1.1 | VI1 | 0 |
| 44. |
| Kar obl | 3 | 1.4 | III3 | 0 |
| 45. |
| Mer cir | 1 | 0.2 | VI1 | 0 |
| 46. |
| Mic kra | 1 | 1.6 | V3 | 0 |
| 47. |
| Mue bac | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 48. |
| Nav car | 2 | 0.2 | III5 | 0 |
| 49. |
| Nav cbr | 2 | 2.0 | III6 | 0 |
| 50. |
| Nav ccr | 1 | 0.4 | III2 | 0 |
| 51. |
| Nav cte | 2 | 0.6 | VI1 | 0 |
| 52. |
| Nav cry | 1 | 0.6 | III2 | 0 |
| 53. |
| Nav dig | 1 | 2.7 | III1 | 0 |
| 54. |
| Nav hal | 1 | 1.3 | V2 | 0 |
| 55. |
| Nav phy | 1 | 1.6 | V3 | 0 |
| 56. |
| Nav rad | 1 | 0.2 | V2 | 0 |
| 57. |
| Nav tri | 1 | 0.2 | III1 | 0 |
| 58. |
| Nav sp1 | 4 | 4.0 | III2 | 0 |
| 59. |
| Nav sp2 | 3 | 4.7 | III3 | 0 |
| 60. |
| Nav sp3 | 4 | 0.5 | III6 | 0 |
| 61. |
| Nei amp | 1 | 0.2 | III2 | 0 |
| 62. |
| Nei per | 1 | 1.9 | V3 | 0 |
| 63. |
| Nei vek | 1 | 0.2 | V3 | 0 |
| 64. |
| Nit alp | 8 | 60.6 | III6 | 6 |
| 65. |
| Nit amp | 1 | 0.2 | III2 | 0 |
| 66. |
| Nit inc | 3 | 8.5 | VI1 | 2 |
| 67. |
| Nit lin | 2 | 0.6 | VI1 | 0 |
| 68. |
| Nit pal | 1 | 0.4 | V3 | 0 |
| 69. |
| Par pro | 1 | 0.2 | VI1 | 0 |
| 70. |
| Pin div | 1 | 0.5 | III6 | 0 |
| 71. |
| Pin mic | 2 | 7.0 | V3 | 1 |
| 72. |
| Pin obs | 2 | 0.5 | III6 | 0 |
| 73. |
| Pin str | 2 | 0.4 | III3 | 0 |
| 74. |
| Pla cle | 2 | 1.0 | III6 | 0 |
| 75. |
| Pla pla | 1 | 0.4 | III3 | 0 |
| 76. |
| Pla con | 1 | 7.4 | V3 | 1 |
| 77. |
| Pla del | 1 | 0.2 | VI1 | 0 |
| 78. |
| Pla hol | 1 | 0.8 | V3 | 0 |
| 79. |
| Pla lan | 1 | 0.4 | V3 | 0 |
| 80. |
| Pla per | 1 | 1.0 | III6 | 0 |
| 81. |
| Psa chl | 2 | 5.4 | V3 | 1 |
| 82. |
| Psa fri | 1 | 0.2 | VI1 | 0 |
| 83. |
| Ach lev | 2 | 0.5 | III6 | 0 |
| 84. |
| Psa sub | 2 | 1.3 | III1 | 0 |
| 85. |
| Pse bre | 2 | 2.3 | VI1 | 0 |
| 86. |
| Rei cap | 1 | 1.7 | VI1 | 0 |
| 87. |
| Rei sin | 2 | 4.0 | III1 | 0 |
| 88. |
| Ros pet | 2 | 1.6 | III5 | 0 |
| 89. |
| Sel lae | 2 | 3.9 | III3 | 0 |
| 90. |
| Sel rad | 2 | 0.5 | III6 | 0 |
| 91. |
| Sta alp | 1 | 2.1 | V3 | 0 |
| 92. |
| Sta anc | 1 | 0.4 | V2 | 0 |
| 93. |
| Sta con | 1 | 1.1 | III1 | 0 |
| 94. |
| Sta vvc | 1 | 3.0 | III6 | 0 |
| 95. |
| Sta pin | 10 | 94.5 | V1 | 8 |
| 96. |
| Tab flo | 3 | 4.1 | III3 | 0 |
Fig. 6Freshwater diatoms from northern Spitsbergen (Svalbard). a Psammothidium levanderi (raphless valve), b Cosmoneis pusilla, c Cymbella designata, d Cymbopleura naviculiformis, e C. tynnii, f Diadesmis gallica, g Diploneis ovalis ssp. arctica. Scale bars = 5 µm
Fig. 7Freshwater diatoms from northern Spitsbergen (Svalbard). a Eunotia grunowii, b E. papilio, c Hygropetra balfouriana, d Parlibellus protractoides, e Navicula trivialis, f Neidiopsis vekhovii, g Sellaphora laevissima, h Diatoma tenuis. Scale bars = 5 µm
Fig. 8NMDS scaling plot based on Bray-Curtis similarities of the diatom data consisting of the presence-absence of diatoms in lacustrine samples
Fig. 9Biplot diagram from CCA summarizing the variation in diatom species composition explained by environmental variables. Arrows represent environmental variables indicated as significant predictors of diatom composition. Score scaling is focused on diatom scores (standardized). Only the 40 best fitting taxa are shown. Eigenvalues: 0.5509, 0.4429, 0.2715