Literature DB >> 32226175

Construction of the Design Matrix for Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models in the Context of Clinical Trials of Treatment Sequences.

Francisco J Diaz1.   

Abstract

The estimation of carry-over effects is a difficult problem in the design and analysis of clinical trials of treatment sequences including cross-over trials. Except for simple designs, carry-over effects are usually unidentifiable and therefore nonestimable. Solutions such as imposing parameter constraints are often unjustified and produce differing carry-over estimates depending on the constraint imposed. Generalized inverses or treatment-balancing often allow estimating main treatment effects, but the problem of estimating the carry-over contribution of a treatment sequence remains open in these approaches. Moreover, washout periods are not always feasible or ethical. A common feature of designs with unidentifiable parameters is that they do not have design matrices of full rank. Thus, we propose approaches to the construction of design matrices of full rank, without imposing artificial constraints on the carry-over effects. Our approaches are applicable within the framework of generalized linear mixed-effects models. We present a new model for the design and analysis of clinical trials of treatment sequences, called Antichronic System, and introduce some special sequences called Skip Sequences. We show that carry-over effects are identifiable only if appropriate Skip Sequences are used in the design and/or data analysis of the clinical trial. We explain how Skip Sequences can be implemented in practice, and present a method of computing the appropriate Skip Sequences. We show applications to the design of a cross-over study with 3 treatments and 3 periods, and to the data analysis of the STAR*D study of sequences of treatments for depression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented regression; Carry-over effects; Design matrix; Estimability; Generalized inverses; Generalized least squares; Identifiability; Maximum likelihood; Placebo; Quasi-likelihood; Random effects linear models; Robust fixed-effects estimators; Vross-over design

Year:  2018        PMID: 32226175      PMCID: PMC7100378          DOI: 10.15446/rce.v41n2.63332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Colomb Estad        ISSN: 0120-1751


  12 in total

1.  Mixed-Effects Logistic Regression Models for Indirectly Observed Discrete Outcome Variables.

Authors:  Jeroen K Vermunt
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Random-effects linear modeling and sample size tables for two special crossover designs of average bioequivalence studies: the four-period, two-sequence, two-formulation and six-period, three-sequence, three-formulation designs.

Authors:  Francisco J Diaz; Michel J Berg; Ron Krebill; Timothy Welty; Barry E Gidal; Rita Alloway; Michael Privitera
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  A critique of recent research on the two-treatment crossover design.

Authors:  J L Fleiss
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-09

4.  Measuring the individual benefit of a medical or behavioral treatment using generalized linear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Francisco J Diaz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bioequivalence Between Generic and Branded Lamotrigine in People With Epilepsy: The EQUIGEN Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Michel Berg; Timothy E Welty; Barry E Gidal; Francisco J Diaz; Ron Krebill; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Barbara A Dworetzky; John R Pollard; Edmund J Elder; Wenlei Jiang; Xiaohui Jiang; Regina D Switzer; Michael D Privitera
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Estimating individual benefits of medical or behavioral treatments in severely ill patients.

Authors:  Francisco J Diaz
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 8.  Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study.

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Harold A Sackeim; Frederic M Quitkin; Steven Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; David J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2003-06

9.  A Marginalized Zero-inflated Poisson Regression Model with Random Effects.

Authors:  D Leann Long; John S Preisser; Amy H Herring; Carol E Golin
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 1.864

10.  Estimating the effects of co-medications on plasma olanzapine concentrations by using a mixed model.

Authors:  Sheila Botts; Francisco J Diaz; Vincenza Santoro; Edoardo Spina; Maria R Muscatello; Myladis Cogollo; Fidel E Castro; Jose de Leon
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.067

View more
  2 in total

1.  A graphical approach to assess the goodness-of-fit of random-effects linear models when the goal is to measure individual benefits of medical treatments in severely ill patients.

Authors:  Zhiwen Wang; Francisco J Diaz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Measuring individual benefits of psychiatric treatment using longitudinal binary outcomes: Application to antipsychotic benefits in non-cannabis and cannabis users.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Jose de Leon; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Francisco J Diaz
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 1.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.