| Literature DB >> 32226082 |
Jacek Radwan1, Aleksandra Biedrzycka1, Wiesław Babik2.
Abstract
Loss of genetic variation may render populations more vulnerable to pathogens due to inbreeding depression and depletion of variation in genes responsible for immunity against parasites. Here we review the evidence for the significance of variation in genes of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) for conservation efforts. MHC molecules present pathogen-derived antigens to the effector cells of the immune system and thus trigger the adaptive immune response. Some MHC genes are the most variable functional genes in the vertebrate genome. Their variation is clearly of adaptive significance and there is considerable evidence that its maintenance is mainly due to balancing selection imposed by pathogens. However, while the evidence for selection shaping MHC variation on the historical timescale is compelling, a correlation between levels of MHC variation and variation at neutral loci is often observed, indicating that on a shorter timescale drift also substantially affects MHC, leading to depletion of MHC diversity. The evidence that the loss of MHC variation negatively affects population survival is so far equivocal and difficult to separate from effects of general inbreeding. Some species with depleted MHC variation seem to be particularly susceptible to infection, but other species thrive and expand following severe bottlenecks that have drastically limited their MHC variation. However, while the latter demonstrate that MHC variation is not always critical for population survival, these species may in fact represent rare examples of survival despite of the loss of MHC variation. There is clearly a compelling need for data that would disclose the possible consequences of MHC diversity for population viability. In particular, we need more data on the impact of MHC allelic richness on the abundance of parasites or prevalence of disease in populations, while controlling for the role of general inbreeding. Before such evidence accumulates, captive breeding programs and other conservation measures aimed at inbreeding avoidance should be favoured over those protecting only MHC variation, especially since inbreeding avoidance programs would usually conserve both types of genetic diversity simultaneously.Entities:
Keywords: Conservation; Extinction; Infectious diseases; Major Histocompatibility Complex; Polymorphism; Positive selection
Year: 2009 PMID: 32226082 PMCID: PMC7092871 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Conserv ISSN: 0006-3207 Impact factor: 5.990
Fig. 1Depletion of genetic variation may affect resistance to pathogens via different paths; drift may fix deleterious mutations impairing organismal function including immune response, or cause the loss of alleles capable of recognition of assault by novel pathogens. Thus, association between infection and genetic diversity within populations need not be due to reduced MHC variation.
MHC and neutral variation in natural populations. N – number of studied populations; Nind – number of studied individuals. The evidence for historical selection on MHC comes from a dN/dS ratio >1 in the Antigen Binding Sites (ABS); Recent selection is inferred from deviation of genotype frequencies from expected Hardy–Weinberg proportions (H–W), lack of correlation of allelic richness with that for neutral alleles (correlation), lack of significant isolation by distance (IBD), higher or lower population differentiation than for neutral alleles (FST outlier, population differentiation FST), departures of allele frequency spectra from those expected under neutrality (Ewens–Watterson (E–W) and Slatkin’s P and bottleneck tests for allele frequency data, Tajima’s D test for nucleotide sequence data).
| Species (Taxon) | Evidence for departure from neutrality | Populations examined | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Historical | Recent (type of evidence) | ||||
| Atlantic salmon ( | 7 | 666 | YES (d | YES (E–W) NO (H–W, correlation) | Comparison of land-locked and river populations |
| Brown trout ( | 9 | 180 | YES (d | NO (Tajima D, E–W, population differentiation ( | Small isolated populations |
| Brown trout ( | 7 | 492 | Not estimated | YES ( | Comparison of large populations and those that have declined in size |
| California coastal steelhead ( | 24 | 444 | YES (d | NO (correlation, population differentiation | Populations that have experienced recent declines in size |
| Gila trout ( | 10 | 142 | YES (d | NO ( | Populations that have declined in size |
| Sockeye salmon ( | 31 | 5400 | YES (d | YES (E–W (16% of pops), Stalkin’s | Thirty one river populations compared with one lake population |
| Alpine newt ( | 7 | 149 | YES (d | NO (correlation, | Groups of allopatric populations of postglacial origin |
| Crested newt ( | 7 | 100 | YES (d | NO (correlation) | Comparison between refugial populations and populations from the postglacial expansion area |
| Great snipe ( | 10 | 175 | YES (d | YES (Tajima’s | Scandinavian mountain vs. East European population |
| Lesser kestrel ( | 7 | 121 | YES (d | YES (Tajima’s | Free ranging but fragmented wild populations |
| South island robin ( | 3 | 26 | YES (d | NO (correlation) | Small, bottlenecked population |
| Spotted suslik ( | 10 | 195 | YES (d | NO (correlation, | Small, bottlenecked populations |
| Water vole ( | 7 | 591 | YES (d | NO (global | Demographically fluctuating populations, comparison of low and high density phase |
| Water vole ( | 3 | 1303 | YES (d | YES (H–W: excess of heterozygotes in MHC but not in microsatellites; | Metapopulations sampled over multiple years |
References.
Landry and Bernatchez (2001).
Campos et al. (2006).
Hansen et al. (2007).
Aguilar and Garza (2006).
Peters and Turner (2008).
Miller et al. (2001).
Babik et al. (2008).
Babik et al. (2009).
Ekblom et al. (2007).
Alcaide et al. (2008).
Miller and Lambert (2004).
Biedrzycka and Radwan (2008).
Bryja et al. (2007).
Oliver et al. (2009).