| Literature DB >> 32225056 |
Yaohua Huang1,2, Ziqiu Lin1,2, Wenping Zhang1,2, Shimei Pang1,2, Pankaj Bhatt1,2, Eldon R Rene3, Alagarasan Jagadeesh Kumar4, Shaohua Chen1,2.
Abstract
Persistent use of the insecticideEntities:
Keywords: D-cyphenothrin; Staphylococcus succinus; bioaugmentation; degradation pathway; kinetics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32225056 PMCID: PMC7232362 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8040473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
The code and levels of three independent variables used in the central composite rotatable design.
| Independent Variables | Code | Code Levels of Variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Temperature (°C) |
| 25 | 30 | 35 |
| pH |
| 5 | 7 | 9 |
| Inoculum size (OD) |
| 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA sequences of Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10 and representative Staphylococcus succinus. Numbers in parentheses represent sequence accession number in GenBank. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values. Bar represents sequence divergence.
Figure 2Utilization of D-cyphenothrin during growth of Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three replicates.
Kinetic parameters of D-cyphenothrin degradation with Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10 in mineral salt medium (MSM).
| Treatments | Regression Equation |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.011 | 0.9830 | 63.0 | |
| HLJ-10 | 0.3896 | 0.9659 | 1.8 |
Note: k refers to degradation constant (day−1); t1/2 refers to half-time (days); R2 refers to determination coefficient.
Box–Behnken experimental design matrix and response of dependent variable for D-cyphenothrin degradation.
| Run |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92.8 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94.9 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 74.1 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94.9 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 91.6 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 77.4 |
| 7 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 85.9 |
| 8 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 82.9 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96.9 |
| 10 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 88.1 |
| 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 73.4 |
| 12 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 85.1 |
| 13 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 79.2 |
| 14 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 74.9 |
| 15 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 90.0 |
| 16 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 77.6 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92.8 |
Note: X1 = Temperature; X2 = pH; X3 = Inoculum size; Y1 = Degradation (%).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of fitted quadratic polynomial model for D-cyphenothrin degradation.
| Source | DF | SS | MS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 9 | 891.53 | 99.06 | 4.64 | 0.0277 |
|
| 1 | 20.48 | 20.48 | 0.9595 | 0.3599 |
|
| 1 | 35.28 | 35.28 | 1.65 | 0.2395 |
|
| 1 | 5.78 | 5.78 | 0.2708 | 0.6188 |
|
| 1 | 0.1600 | 0.1600 | 0.0075 | 0.9334 |
|
| 1 | 67.24 | 67.24 | 3.15 | 0.1192 |
|
| 1 | 5.29 | 5.29 | 0.2478 | 0.6339 |
|
| 1 | 240.33 | 240.33 | 11.26 | 0.0122 |
|
| 1 | 460.24 | 460.24 | 21.56 | 0.0024 |
|
| 1 | 5.62 | 5.62 | 0.2632 | 0.6237 |
| Residual | 7 | 149.41 | 21.34 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 3 | 137.56 | 45.85 | 15.48 | 0.0115 |
| Pure Error | 4 | 11.85 | 2.96 | ||
| Cor Total | 16 | 1040.94 |
Note: X1 = Temperature; X2 = pH; X3 = Inoculum size. DF refers to degrees of freedom; SS refers to sum of sequences; MS refers to mean square. *p level < 0.05 indicates that model terms are significant.
Figure 3Response surface plot showing the effects of pH and temperature (°C) on D-cyphenothrin degradation by Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10 while fixing the zero of inoculum size at a coded level.
Chromatographic properties of D-cyphenothrin metabolites during degradation with Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10.
| Code | RT (min) |
| Compound Structure | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 27.975 | 375 |
| ( |
| A2 | 28.050 | 375 |
| ( |
| B | 23.160 | 156 |
| |
| C | 23.144 | 172 |
| 2,2-Dimethyl-3-propenyl-cyclopropionic acid |
| D | 23.399 | 154 |
| |
| E | 16.814 | 227 |
| α-Hydroxy-3-phenoxy-benzeneacetonitrile |
| F | 16.765 | 198 |
| 3-Phenoxybenzaldehyde |
| G | 26.634 | 232 |
| 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dipropyl ester |
Figure 4Proposed D-cyphenothrin degradation pathway in Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10.
Figure 5(A) Degradation of different initial concentrations of D-cyphenothrin by Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10; (B) Degradation of various pyrethroids by Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10.
Figure 6Degradation kinetics of D-cyphenothrin in different soils.
Kinetic parameters of D-cyphenothrin degradation with Staphylococcus succinus HLJ-10 in sterile and nonsterile soils.
| Treatments | Regression Equation |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterile soils + D-cyphenothrin | 0.0124 | 0.9302 | 55.9 | |
| Nonsterile soils + D-cyphenothrin | 0.015 | 0.942 | 46.2 | |
| Sterile soils + D-cyphenothrin + HLJ-10 | 0.0283 | 0.9878 | 24.5 | |
| Nonsterile soils + D-cyphenothrin + HLJ-10 | 0.0323 | 0.9899 | 21.5 |
k refers to degradation constant (day−1); t1/2 refers to half-time (days); R2 refers to determination coefficient. Note: like other footnote.