| Literature DB >> 32225046 |
Jing Liu1, Chunyan Xie1, Chao Fu1, Xiuli Wei2, Dake Wu1.
Abstract
When properly processed, rice husk ash (RHA) comprises a large amount of SiO2, which exhibits a high pozzolanic activity and acts as a good building filler. In this paper, the effects of rice husk ash content, acid pretreatment, and production regions on the compressive and flexural properties and water absorption of a cement paste were studied. The experimental results showed that the compressive strength of the rice husk ash was the highest with a 10% content level, which was about 16.22% higher than that of the control sample. The rice husk after acid pretreatment displayed a higher strength than that of the sample without the acid treatment, and the rice husk from the Inner Mongolia region indicated a higher strength than that from the Guangdong province. However, the flexural strength of each group was not significantly different from that of the blank control group. The trend observed for the water absorption was similar to that of the compressive strength. The variation in the RHA proportions had the greatest influence on the properties of the paste specimens, followed by the acid pretreatments of the rice husks. The production regions of the rice husks indicated the least influence.Entities:
Keywords: acid treatment; amount percent; cement paste; compressive strength; rice husk ash
Year: 2020 PMID: 32225046 PMCID: PMC7177923 DOI: 10.3390/ma13071524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1XRD patterns of the Inner Mongolia autonomous region and treated by acid (N1), Inner Mongolia autonomous region and used without acid treatment (N2), and Guangdong province treated by acid (G1) rice husk ash (RHA) samples.
Chemical composition of different types of RHA samples.
| Samples | SiO2 | K2O | Na2O | Fe2O3 | MgO | CaO | P2O5 | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | 97.39 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 1.62 |
| N2 | 91.09 | 4.12 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.21 | 2.63 |
| G1 | 95.27 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 3.38 |
| G2 | 88.83 | 5.53 | 0.57 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 3.17 |
Figure 2SEM images of RHA: (a) outer surface; (b) inner surface; (c) plane of interlayer; (d) cross-section of interlayer.
Cement paste mixture proportions.
| Mix | Percentage of RHA * | Origin of RHA | Acid Pretreated | Cement Content | C/S Ratio | W/B Ratio | Water Reducing Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0 | 0 | - | - | 1 | 1/3 | 0.55 | 1% |
| N1-5 | 5% | Inner Mongolia | Yes | 0.95 | 1/3 | 0.55 | 1% |
| N1-10 | 10% | Inner Mongolia | Yes | 0.9 | 1/3 | 0.55 | 1% |
| N1-15 | 15% | Inner Mongolia | Yes | 0.85 | 1/3 | 0.55 | 1% |
| N1-20 | 20% | Inner Mongolia | Yes | 0.8 | 1/3 | 0.55 | 1% |
| N2-10 | 10% | Inner Mongolia | No | 0.9 | 1/3 | 0.55 | 1% |
| G1-10 | 10% | Guangdong | Yes | 0.9 | 1/3 | 0.55 | 1% |
| G2-10 | 10% | Guangdong | No | 0.9 | 1/3 | 0.55 | 1% |
* All the proportions and ratios are weight proportions.
Figure 3Compressive strength of different RHA rate cement at 7, 28, and 56 d.
Figure 4Compressive strength of different RHA cement at 7, 28, and 56 d.
Figure 5Flexural strength and coefficient water absorption of different ratios of RHA-cements at 7 and 28 d.
Figure 6Flexural strength and coefficient water absorption of different types of RHA-cements at 7 and 28 d.
Figure 7SEM view of N1-10 RHA cement at 28 d.
Figure 8SEM view of N1-10 RHA cement at 56 d.