Literature DB >> 32224991

High-Throughput Screening of the ReFRAME Library Identifies Potential Drug Repurposing Candidates for Trypanosoma cruzi.

Jean A Bernatchez1,2, Emily Chen3, Mitchell V Hull3, Case W McNamara3, James H McKerrow1,2, Jair L Siqueira-Neto1,2.   

Abstract

Chagas disease, caused by the kinetoplastid parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, affects between 6 and 7 million people worldwide, with an estimated 300,000 to 1 million of these cases in the United States. In the chronic phase of infection, T. cruzi can cause severe gastrointestinal and cardiac disease, which can be fatal. Currently, only benznidazole is clinically approved by the FDA for pediatric use to treat this infection in the USA. Toxicity associated with this compound has driven the search for new anti-Chagas agents. Drug repurposing is a particularly attractive strategy for neglected diseases, as pharmacological parameters and toxicity are already known for these compounds, reducing costs and saving time in the drug development pipeline. Here, we screened 7680 compounds from the Repurposing, Focused Rescue, and Accelerated Medchem (ReFRAME) library, a collection of drugs or compounds with confirmed clinical safety, against T. cruzi. We identified seven compounds of interest with potent in vitro activity against the parasite with a therapeutic index of 10 or greater, including the previously unreported activity of the antiherpetic compound 348U87. These results provide the framework for further development of new T. cruzi leads that can potentially move quickly to the clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trypanosoma cruzi; antiparasitics; drug repurposing; high-throughput screening

Year:  2020        PMID: 32224991      PMCID: PMC7232187          DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8040472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microorganisms        ISSN: 2076-2607


1. Introduction

Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease, is a protozoan parasite that is primarily transmitted to humans via triatomine insects (known as kissing bugs) during a blood meal. Infection by T. cruzi manifests initially in an acute phase of infection, and if left untreated, proceeds to a chronic phase [1]. During the acute phase, mild or unremarkable symptoms such as fever, fatigue, rash, headache, or swelling at the site of the triatome bite may present. When left untreated, the primary infection usually resolves in weeks, but residual parasites remain in the host’s body, evolving to the chronic phase. Over the span of years to decades, approximately 30% of those infected individuals will manifest cardiac and/or gastrointestinal complications, leading to morbidity and mortality [2]. Current treatment options are very limited for Chagas disease; only benznidazole is clinically approved for pediatric use in the case of acute T. cruzi infections in the United States. Benznidazole and nifurtimox are available off-label via the CDC for compassionate use for all other cases of this infection. However, severe side effects associated with the use of these medications lead to high levels of patient discontinuation of treatment. Furthermore, the usefulness of benznidazole in the chronic phase of infection is disputed within the Chagas research community [3,4,5]. Limited effort from the pharmaceutical industry to develop a medication for T. cruzi infections further complicates progress towards anti-Chagas agents better than benznidazole and nifurtimox. Rising costs and high levels of failure of drug molecules in clinical trials, due to adverse events and lack of efficacy, present further general barriers to the development of medications. One cost-effective strategy involves repurposing existing drugs with known toxicity and pharmacokinetic profiles for other indications [6]. This has the potential to speed up drug development efforts, reduce costs, and lower the chance of adverse events presenting in clinical trials. The Repurposing, Focused Rescue, and Accelerated Medchem (ReFRAME) library, a comprehensive set of molecules with tested clinical safety, has been previously used to identify potential drug repurposing hits for neglected tropical diseases [7,8]. In this work, we screened 7680 compounds from this library against the medically relevant intracellular, amastigote form of T. cruzi, infecting mouse myoblasts using a high-throughput, phenotypic cellular imaging assay that our group has successfully used in previous studies to identify novel antitrypanosomal agents [9,10,11]. We identified seven compounds with suitable selectivity indexes (SIs) for drug repurposing; two of these, the antiherpetic drug 348U87 and the serotonin receptor binder 3-[4-[4-(2-Methoxyphenyl)piperazine-1-yl]butyl]-6-[2-[4-(4-fluorobenzoyl)piperidine-1-yl]ethyl]benzothiazole-2(3H)-one, have not previously been reported as anti-Chagas compounds, and may target the parasite through a novel mechanism. These molecules form an attractive collection of lead molecules for potential drug repurposing to treat Chagas disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cells

C2C12 mouse myoblasts (ATCC CRL-1772) and CA-I/72 T. cruzi (kindly donated by J. Dvorak, NIH) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 essentially as described [11]. Passaging of CA-I/72 T. cruzi was conducted weekly via co-culture with C2C12 host cells.

2.2. Phenotypic Imaging Assay

Compounds from the ReFRAME library, benznidazole (Sigma Alderich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and DMSO (Sigma Alderich, St. Louis, MO, USA), were transferred to black 1536-well plates (Greiner Bio One, Kremsmünster, Austria) with clear bottoms using an Acoustic Transfer System (ATS) instrument (EDC Biosystems, Fremont, CA, USA). C2C12 cells were seeded at a density of 100 cells per well, and CA-I/72 T. cruzi parasites were seeded at a density of 1500 cells per well, using a Multidrop Combi liquid handler (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Plates were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 72 h in humidified trays to reduce edge effect. Following this incubation, paraformaldehyde (4% final concentration) in 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Invitrogen, 10010023) was used to fix the cells for 1 h. The cells were then subsequently treated with 5 µg/mL DAPI staining solution (Sigma Aldrich, D9542) for 1 h. Next, the plates were imaged using an ImageXpress Micro XLS automated high-content imager (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA), using the 10× fluorescence objective. Images were analyzed automatically using a custom image analysis module [9,11].

2.3. Software

Chemical structures were prepared using ChemDraw Professional 18.1 (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). EC50 and CC50 values were generated using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Primary Screening of the ReFRAME Library against T. cruzi Using a High-Content Imaging Assay

Compounds from the ReFRAME library were pre-spotted on 1536 clear-bottom black well plates in 100% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for a final concentration of 10 µM in 10 µL final volume (and 0.1% DMSO final concentration). C2C12 mouse myoblasts and CA-I/72 strain T. cruzi trypomastigotes were added to the plate in a 1:15 infection ratio and incubated for 72 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (final concentration), and stained with 5 µg/mL of 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to highlight the nuclei from the host cells and parasites. Using an ImageXpress Micro XLS automated microscope (10× magnification setting), fluorescence images of C2C12 and T. cruzi amastigote nuclei were acquired for each well, and the number of host cell nuclei and amastigote nuclei were automatically determined using a custom image analysis module as previously described [9,10,11] (Figure 1). Parasite amastigote nuclei were selectively counted over trypomastigote nuclei, via distance gating of parasitic nuclei distance from host cell nuclei in the microscopy images.
Figure 1

Automated segmentation analysis of T. cruzi amastigote and C2C12 mouse cardiomyocyte nuclei. (A) Fluorescence microscopy image (10× magnification) of 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained C2C12 infected with CA-I/72 T. cruzi amastigotes 72 h post-infection. (B) Custom module segmentation of host and parasite cell nuclei using MetaXpress 5.0 (Molecular Devices). Host cell nuclei are in yellow and parasite nuclei are in dark blue.

Infection levels were calculated as a ratio of the number of T. cruzi amastigotes per C2C12 host cell, as determined by nuclei counting. Compound toxicity was determined by dividing the number of host cell nuclei in a drug-treated well by the average of the vehicle controls. For both infection ratios and cell viability ratios, values were normalized to the vehicle controls to determine percent activity and toxicity, respectively. Control wells containing uninfected C2C12 cells, infected C2C12 cells with 0.1% DMSO, and infected C2C12 cells with 0.1% DMSO and 50 µM benznidazole were prepared in each plate for data normalization. The mean Z’ for the 10 plates tested was 0.52 with a standard error of 0.01. Hit selection cutoffs for the primary screen were set at 70% antiparasitic activity (70% parasite reduction compared to untreated controls) and 50% host cell viability at 10 µM compound compared to untreated controls (represents approximately three standard deviations from the average of the untreated controls). We identified 238 compounds (2% of the total library) that met these selection criteria. A summary of the primary screening data is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Primary screening data for the Repurposing, Focused Rescue, and Accelerated Medchem (ReFRAME) library against T. cruzi in the phenotypic high-content imaging assay. Scatter plot of normalized % activity against CA-I/72 T. cruzi (normalized antiparasitic activity %, Y-axis) and the host cell C2C12 viability % (normalized host viability %, X-axis) for the ReFRAME library. The red dots represent the uninfected controls, green dots represent 50 µM benznidazole control (reference drug), blue dots represent untreated controls (0.1% DMSO), and the yellow dots are the tested compounds. A vertical line at 50% normalized host viability and a horizontal line at 70% normalized antiparasitic activity highlight the top right quadrant where the compounds were selected as hits for dose-response confirmation.

3.2. Counter-Screen of 238 Hits in Dose Response

To validate the hits obtained from our primary screen, compounds were re-spotted in duplicate in a 10-point, 3-fold dilution dose response, with 10 µM as the highest concentration of inhibitor. Using the high-content imaging assay, 238 primary hits were retested in duplicate. We identified seven compounds of interest using the following cutoff criteria: at least 70% antiparasitic activity at a given drug concentration in one of the two dose response replicates, and a therapeutic index of 10 or greater. Half maximal effective concentration (EC50), half maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50), and selective index (SI; defined by the ratio of CC50 to EC50) for validated hits are shown in Table 1, and the chemical structures of these compounds are displayed in Figure 3. The seven compounds retained were NSC-706744, 348U87, ASP-8273, XR 5944, Prenyl-IN-1, 3-[4-[4-(2-Methoxyphenyl)piperazine-1-yl]butyl]-6-[2-[4-(4-fluorobenzoyl)piperidine-1-yl]ethyl]benzothiazole-2(3H)-one and incadronate disodium.
Table 1

EC50 and CC50 values for 7 validated hits from the ReFRAME library against CA-I/72 T. cruzi in the phenotypic high-content imaging assay, ranked in order of potency. Values were calculated from duplicate dose response data, +/− standard error (SE). EC50 values are for T. cruzi CA-I/72 parasites. CC50 values are for C2C12 cardiomyocyte host cells. Selectivity index = CC50/EC50.

Compound NameEC50 CA-I/72 T. cruzi (nM)CC50 C2C12 (nM)Selectivity Index (SI)
NSC-7067440.44 +/− 0.0894 +/− 56214
348U870.63 +/− 0.45815 +/− 2151294
ASP-82732.7 +/− 1.9515 +/− 280191
XR 59443.5 +/− 6.846 +/− 2113
Prenyl-IN-118 +/− 12182 +/− 9010
3-[4-[4-(2-Methoxyphenyl)piperazine-1-yl]butyl]-6-[2-[4-(4-fluorobenzoyl)piperidine-1-yl]ethyl]benzothiazole-2(3H)-one22 +/− 233190 +/− 1202145
Incadronate Disodium480 +/− 385>10,000>20
Figure 3

Chemical structures of hit compounds from the high-throughput screening campaign.

4. Discussion

Given the toxicity of currently available drugs to treat T. cruzi infection, research efforts have been made to explore additional candidate molecules against the parasite. In this work, we screened a drug repurposing library for compounds with anti-Chagasic activity. We identified seven molecules as having potent in vitro activity against T. cruzi and a SI of at least 10 against C2C12 cardiomyocyte host cells. As validation for our assay, we identified a number of compounds from classes which have previously been reported as having anti-Chagas activity, namely farnesyltransferase inhibitors [12,13,14,15,16] (Prenyl-IN-1, incadronate disodium) and DNA topoisomerase inhibitors [17,18,19,20] (NSC-706744, XR 5944). We also identified the EGFR inhibitor ASP-8273 (naquotinib) [21,22,23] as an inhibitor of T. cruzi with good potency (EC50 of 2.7 nM) and a SI of 191. Several studies have successfully explored kinase inhibitors of trypanosomatids as therapeutic agents [24,25,26], and this compound may represent yet another possible candidate for repurposing or further chemical derivatization. Interestingly, we identified two compounds with intriguing primary indications that may target T. cruzi by novel mechanisms. First, serotonin receptor ligands such as 3-[4-[4-(2-Methoxyphenyl)piperazine-1-yl]butyl]-6-[2-[4-(4-fluorobenzoyl)piperidine-1-yl]ethyl]benzothiazole-2(3H)-one [27] have been investigated as agents to treat anxiety and panic disorders. This compound had an EC50 of 22 nM and a SI of 145, making it an attractive candidate for drug repurposing and animal model testing. Second, the herpes virus drug 348U87 (EC50 of 0.63 nM and a SI of 1294), which targets the viral ribonucleotide reductase [28,29,30,31], has been shown to potentiate the activity of acyclovir in topical applications. The thiosemicarbazone iron chelator 3-AP has also been shown to inactivate the ribonucleotide reductase of T. brucei [32], and 348U87 may act against a homologous protein of T. cruzi in a similar manner. For both the aforementioned compounds, mechanistic studies are planned and ongoing to identify the precise molecular targets of these inhibitors. Follow-up studies in our group will test our most promising compounds in mouse models of T. cruzi infection, to establish proper dosing protocols and in vivo efficacy. In sum, these compounds represent new potent leads with known pharmacological parameters and possibly novel mechanisms of action against T. cruzi, making them attractive candidates for accelerated development as anti-Chagas agents.
  31 in total

1.  Herpes and human ribonucleotide reductases. Inhibition by 2-acetylpyridine 5-[(2-chloroanilino)-thiocarbonyl]-thiocarbonohydrazone (348U87).

Authors:  T Spector; J A Harrington; D J Porter
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1991-06-21       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Second generation analogues of the cancer drug clinical candidate tipifarnib for anti-Chagas disease drug discovery.

Authors:  James M Kraus; Hari Babu Tatipaka; Sarah A McGuffin; Naveen Kumar Chennamaneni; Mandana Karimi; Jenifer Arif; Christophe L M J Verlinde; Frederick S Buckner; Michael H Gelb
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Effect of topoisomerase inhibitors and DNA-binding drugs on the cell proliferation and ultrastructure of Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Aline Araujo Zuma; Danielle Pereira Cavalcanti; Marina C P Maia; Wanderley de Souza; Maria Cristina M Motta
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  The ReFRAME library as a comprehensive drug repurposing library to identify mammarenavirus inhibitors.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Kim; Beatrice Cubitt; Emily Chen; Mitchell V Hull; Arnab K Chatterjee; Yingyun Cai; Jens H Kuhn; Juan C de la Torre
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.970

Review 5.  Clinical and epidemiological aspects of Chagas disease.

Authors:  A Prata
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Rational modification of a candidate cancer drug for use against Chagas disease.

Authors:  James M Kraus; Christophe L M J Verlinde; Mandana Karimi; Galina I Lepesheva; Michael H Gelb; Frederick S Buckner
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Topical treatment of infection with acyclovir-resistant mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus with the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor 348U87 in combination with acyclovir.

Authors:  S Safrin; T Schacker; J Delehanty; E Hill; L Corey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Hit-to-Lead Optimization of Benzoxazepinoindazoles As Human African Trypanosomiasis Therapeutics.

Authors:  Dana M Klug; Laura Tschiegg; Rosario Diaz; Domingo Rojas-Barros; Guiomar Perez-Moreno; Gloria Ceballos; Raquel García-Hernández; Maria Santos Martinez-Martinez; Pilar Manzano; Luis Miguel Ruiz; Conor R Caffrey; Francisco Gamarro; Dolores Gonzalez Pacanowska; Lori Ferrins; Miguel Navarro; Michael P Pollastri
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 9.  Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Sudeep Pushpakom; Francesco Iorio; Patrick A Eyers; K Jane Escott; Shirley Hopper; Andrew Wells; Andrew Doig; Tim Guilliams; Joanna Latimer; Christine McNamee; Alan Norris; Philippe Sanseau; David Cavalla; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  The ReFRAME library as a comprehensive drug repurposing library and its application to the treatment of cryptosporidiosis.

Authors:  Jeff Janes; Megan E Young; Emily Chen; Nicole H Rogers; Sebastian Burgstaller-Muehlbacher; Laura D Hughes; Melissa S Love; Mitchell V Hull; Kelli L Kuhen; Ashley K Woods; Sean B Joseph; H Michael Petrassi; Case W McNamara; Matthew S Tremblay; Andrew I Su; Peter G Schultz; Arnab K Chatterjee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Of Drugs and Trypanosomatids: New Tools and Knowledge to Reduce Bottlenecks in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Arijit Bhattacharya; Audrey Corbeil; Rubens L do Monte-Neto; Christopher Fernandez-Prada
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Identification of Inhibitors to Trypanosoma cruzi Sirtuins Based on Compounds Developed to Human Enzymes.

Authors:  Tanira Matutino Bastos; Milena Botelho Pereira Soares; Caio Haddad Franco; Laura Alcântara; Lorenzo Antonini; Manuela Sabatino; Nicola Mautone; Lucio Holanda Freitas-Junior; Carolina Borsoi Moraes; Rino Ragno; Dante Rotili; Sergio Schenkman; Antonello Mai; Nilmar Silvio Moretti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Past and future of trypanosomatids high-throughput phenotypic screening.

Authors:  Rafael Ferreira Dantas; Eduardo Caio Torres-Santos; Floriano Paes Silva
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.743

4.  Identification of Leucinostatins from Ophiocordyceps sp. as Antiparasitic Agents against Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Jean A Bernatchez; Yun-Seo Kil; Elany Barbosa da Silva; Diane Thomas; Laura-Isobel McCall; Karen L Wendt; Julia M Souza; Jasmin Ackermann; James H McKerrow; Robert H Cichewicz; Jair L Siqueira-Neto
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-01-28

5.  Repurposing the Kinase Inhibitor Mavelertinib for Giardiasis Therapy.

Authors:  Samantha A Michaels; Matthew A Hulverson; Grant R Whitman; Linh T Tran; Ryan Choi; Erkang Fan; Case W McNamara; Melissa S Love; Kayode K Ojo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 6.  Challenges in Chagas Disease Drug Development.

Authors:  Amanda F Francisco; Shiromani Jayawardhana; Francisco Olmo; Michael D Lewis; Shane R Wilkinson; Martin C Taylor; John M Kelly
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 7.  Host-directed therapy, an untapped opportunity for antimalarial intervention.

Authors:  Ling Wei; Jack Adderley; Didier Leroy; David H Drewry; Danny W Wilson; Alexis Kaushansky; Christian Doerig
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-10-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.