Lauri Martikkala1, Sari-Leena Himanen1,2, Katja Virtanen2, Katri Mäkelä1. 1. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Medical Imaging Centre and Hospital Pharmacy, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; and. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The median nerve cross-sectional area at the wrist (CSA) and the wrist-to-forearm ratio of the cross-sectional areas (WFR) are ultrasound parameters used in the diagnosis and grading of carpal tunnel syndrome. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CSA and WFR as well as to compare their diagnostic value. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted of a cohort of 218 patients who had undergone nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and an ultrasound of the median nerve. The examined wrists were classified into an NCS negative and three NCS positive (mild, moderate, and severe) categories. The CSA and WFR were compared across the categories. RESULTS: The CSA and WFR were significantly smaller in the NCS negative category than in the NCS positive categories. The WFR was significantly smaller in the mild category than in the moderate category. The CSA could not be used to differentiate across the NCS positive categories. CONCLUSIONS: The CSA and WFR are satisfactorily reliable in detecting carpal tunnel syndrome, but they cannot be considered as surrogate indicators of electrophysiological severity.
PURPOSE: The median nerve cross-sectional area at the wrist (CSA) and the wrist-to-forearm ratio of the cross-sectional areas (WFR) are ultrasound parameters used in the diagnosis and grading of carpal tunnel syndrome. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CSA and WFR as well as to compare their diagnostic value. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted of a cohort of 218 patients who had undergone nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and an ultrasound of the median nerve. The examined wrists were classified into an NCS negative and three NCS positive (mild, moderate, and severe) categories. The CSA and WFR were compared across the categories. RESULTS: The CSA and WFR were significantly smaller in the NCS negative category than in the NCS positive categories. The WFR was significantly smaller in the mild category than in the moderate category. The CSA could not be used to differentiate across the NCS positive categories. CONCLUSIONS: The CSA and WFR are satisfactorily reliable in detecting carpal tunnel syndrome, but they cannot be considered as surrogate indicators of electrophysiological severity.