Sarah Quirk1, Petra Grendarova2, Peter Craighead2, Tien Phan2, Mark Lesiuk3, James Pinilla2, Hong-Wei Liu4, Jane Wilson5, Katelyn Bignell3, Tammy Austin3, Ivo A Olivotto2, Michael Roumeliotis6. 1. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Calgary, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: sarah.quirk@gmail.com. 2. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada. 3. Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada. 4. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Canada; Central Alberta Cancer Centre, Red Deer, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 5. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Canada; Jack Ady Cancer Centre, Lethbridge, Canada. 6. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Calgary, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the achieved dosimetry in the ACCEL trial and compare the results to reported dosimetry from the major accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) phase III trials. METHODS: The ACCEL trial was a single arm, phase II, prospective cohort study. A five-field, inverse-planned, IMRT strategy was employed using a class solution technique to increase planning consistency including high dose conformity and low normal tissue dose to the ipsilateral breast. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, 283 patients were treated with 27 Gy in five fractions in consecutive days. The average PTV conformity index was 1.1. For the ipsilateral breast, the median (range) volume receiving 95% and 50% of the prescription dose was 9.7% (3.2-22.4) and 30.3% (11.1-54.6), respectively. Compared to major APBI phase III trial constraints, this reduction in irradiated volume at the 95% and 50% isodose levels represents a reduction of 209 cm3 and 265 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSION: The IMRT planning strategy employed in the ACCEL trial demonstrated consistent and superior dosimetry by comparison to conventionally used 3D CRT techniques. Future APBI trials should update dosimetric constraints.
PURPOSE: To report the achieved dosimetry in the ACCEL trial and compare the results to reported dosimetry from the major accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) phase III trials. METHODS: The ACCEL trial was a single arm, phase II, prospective cohort study. A five-field, inverse-planned, IMRT strategy was employed using a class solution technique to increase planning consistency including high dose conformity and low normal tissue dose to the ipsilateral breast. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, 283 patients were treated with 27 Gy in five fractions in consecutive days. The average PTV conformity index was 1.1. For the ipsilateral breast, the median (range) volume receiving 95% and 50% of the prescription dose was 9.7% (3.2-22.4) and 30.3% (11.1-54.6), respectively. Compared to major APBI phase III trial constraints, this reduction in irradiated volume at the 95% and 50% isodose levels represents a reduction of 209 cm3 and 265 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSION: The IMRT planning strategy employed in the ACCEL trial demonstrated consistent and superior dosimetry by comparison to conventionally used 3D CRT techniques. Future APBI trials should update dosimetric constraints.