Literature DB >> 32224241

Modern Treatment Trends and Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism With and Without Hemodynamic Significance.

Clancy W Mullan1, Joshua Newman2, Merideth Geib3, Matthew D Pichert4, Areo Saffarzadeh4, Alan Hartman2, Brian Lima2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is common, but the benefit of surgical embolectomy remains unclear. National trends in embolectomy have been described to 2008. Recent data are lacking. We characterized the national trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of pulmonary embolisms, along with the population-level outcomes.
METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried by International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision codes for pulmonary embolisms from 2011 to 2014. Saddle embolisms, shock, and interventions, including systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and pulmonary embolectomy, were identified. Predictors of in-hospital death were identified by logistic regression.
RESULTS: We identified 1,283,063 embolism records, including 34,040 (2.6%) with saddle embolism, 31,057 (2.4%) with shock, and 1768 (0.14%) had saddle embolism with shock. Embolectomy and catheter-directed therapies were associated with reduced death in saddle embolism with shock (n = 1768; embolectomy: odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.48; catheter-directed therapies: OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96). Systemic thrombolytics were not associated with a in-hospital death difference (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 60.87-1.38). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with increased death (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.09-3.92). The number needed to treat for in-hospital death of saddle embolisms with shock was 4.7 (95% CI, 3.9-6.9).
CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary nationally representative sample, surgical embolectomy and catheter-directed therapies were associated reduced in-hospital death for saddle pulmonary embolism with shock, and systemic thrombolytics were not associated with in-hospital death.
Copyright © 2020 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32224241     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  2 in total

1.  Massive Embolism: Knife versus PCI.

Authors:  Scarlett Tohme; Joshua S Newman; Christopher Gasparis; Frank Manetta
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-08-20

2.  Type 2 Diabetes Is a Risk Factor for Suffering and for in-Hospital Mortality with Pulmonary Embolism. A Population-Based Study in Spain (2016-2018).

Authors:  Rodrigo Jiménez-García; Romana Albaladejo-Vicente; Valentin Hernandez-Barrera; Rosa Villanueva-Orbaiz; David Carabantes-Alarcon; Javier de-Miguel-Diez; José Javier Zamorano-Leon; Ana Lopez-de-Andres
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.