| Literature DB >> 32223988 |
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32223988 PMCID: PMC7194678 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.03.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Lung ISSN: 0147-9563 Impact factor: 3.149
Comparison of studies that reported Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) as a rescue therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19.
| Huang C et al. | Nanshan Chen et al. | Wang D et al. | Yang X et al. | Guan WJ et al. | Zhou F et al. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-sectional | Retrospective, observational | Case series | Retrospective, observational | Cross-sectional | Retrospective, cohort study | |
| 41 | 99 | 138 | 710 | 1099 | 191 | |
| 31.7 (18.08–48.08) | 17.17 (10.33–26.06) | 26.08 (18.98–34.24) | 7.32 (5.51–9.49) | 5.0 (3.79–6.46) | 26,17 (20.09–33.01) | |
| 29.26 (16.13–45.53) | 17.17 (10.33–26.06) | 19.56 (13.3–27.17) | 4.93 (3.45–6.78) | 3.36 (2.38–4.6) | 30.89 (24.1–37.96) | |
| Data were unavailable to calculate | 0.46 (0.09–2.39) | Data were unavailable to calculate) | 0.89 (0.61–1.29) | 2.88 (1.65–5.01) | 0.96 (0.66–1.41) | |
| 14.63 (5.56–29.17) | 11.11 (5.67–19.01) | 4.34(1.61–9.22) | 4.50 (3.10–6.30) | 1.36 (0.76–2.24) | 28,27 (22.0–35.22) |
Fig. 1Forest plot of intensive care unit mortality across 4 studies that have reported the use of ECMO in adults with ARDS due to COVID-19.