Literature DB >> 32223651

The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures.

David R Nerenz1, David Cella2, Lacy Fabian3, Eugene Nuccio4, John Bott5, J Matt Austin6, Sam Simon7, Jack Needleman8, Karen Johnson9.   

Abstract

In the summer of 2017, the National Quality Forum (NQF) announced the formation of a Scientific Methods Panel (hereafter referred to as "the Panel") as part of a redesign of its endorsement process. NQF created the Panel in response to stakeholder request during a Kaizen improvement event held in May 2017. Given the Panel's role in the endorsement of performance measures used in national payment programs, the objective of this article is to describe the work of the Panel, and to describe its function in the larger context of the NQF measure endorsement process and in the measurement enterprise writ large. This article also serves as an introduction to a series of planned white papers being authored by the panel on specific technical issues in the area of health care performance measurement.

Keywords:  National Quality Forum; measure reliability; measure validity; quality measures

Year:  2020        PMID: 32223651     DOI: 10.1177/1062860620914026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  1 in total

1.  Reproducibility of Hospital Rankings Based on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare Measures as a Function of Measure Reliability.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; David R Nerenz; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Bruce L Hall; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.