Grace Kong1, Meghan E Morean2, Krysten W Bold3, Ran Wu3, Harmanpreet Bhatti3, Patricia Simon3, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. Electronic address: grace.kong@yale.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519, USA; Department of Psychology, Oberlin College, OH 44074, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: E-cigarettes appeal to adolescents because of alternative uses, such as dripping (i.e., applying e-liquid directly on the atomizer) and conducting vape tricks (i.e., creating shapes from exhaled aerosol). However, little is known about these behaviors and adolescents who engage in these behaviors. METHODS: Using cross-sectional surveys from 4 high schools in Connecticut in 2017 (N = 2945), we assessed the frequency of dripping and conducting vape tricks, product characteristics (e.g., nicotine, flavor) used for these behaviors, and where adolescents learn about these behaviors. We also conducted multinomial logistic regression analysis to assess whether demographics, age of e-cigarette use onset, past-month-use of e-cigarettes, and lifetime use of other tobacco products were associated with dripping and/or vape tricks. RESULTS: Among ever e-cigarette users (N = 1047), 20.5% ever dripped and 54.9% ever conducted vape tricks. The most frequently endorsed 1) flavors used for both behaviors were fruit, candy, and mint, 2) nicotine concentrations used for dripping was 3 mg and for vape tricks was 0 mg, and 3) the top source for learning these behaviors were friends. The multinomial model showed that earlier age of e-cigarette use onset, past-month-use of e-cigarettes, and lifetime use of other tobacco products were associated with dripping and vape tricks. DISCUSSION: Engaging in dripping and vape tricks was associated with risky tobacco use behaviors (e.g., earlier age of onset, other tobacco use), and involved exposure to nicotine and flavors. Reducing appeal of dripping and vape tricks and preventing product characteristics that facilitate these behaviors may reduce harm to adolescents.
INTRODUCTION: E-cigarettes appeal to adolescents because of alternative uses, such as dripping (i.e., applying e-liquid directly on the atomizer) and conducting vape tricks (i.e., creating shapes from exhaled aerosol). However, little is known about these behaviors and adolescents who engage in these behaviors. METHODS: Using cross-sectional surveys from 4 high schools in Connecticut in 2017 (N = 2945), we assessed the frequency of dripping and conducting vape tricks, product characteristics (e.g., nicotine, flavor) used for these behaviors, and where adolescents learn about these behaviors. We also conducted multinomial logistic regression analysis to assess whether demographics, age of e-cigarette use onset, past-month-use of e-cigarettes, and lifetime use of other tobacco products were associated with dripping and/or vape tricks. RESULTS: Among ever e-cigarette users (N = 1047), 20.5% ever dripped and 54.9% ever conducted vape tricks. The most frequently endorsed 1) flavors used for both behaviors were fruit, candy, and mint, 2) nicotine concentrations used for dripping was 3 mg and for vape tricks was 0 mg, and 3) the top source for learning these behaviors were friends. The multinomial model showed that earlier age of e-cigarette use onset, past-month-use of e-cigarettes, and lifetime use of other tobacco products were associated with dripping and vape tricks. DISCUSSION: Engaging in dripping and vape tricks was associated with risky tobacco use behaviors (e.g., earlier age of onset, other tobacco use), and involved exposure to nicotine and flavors. Reducing appeal of dripping and vape tricks and preventing product characteristics that facilitate these behaviors may reduce harm to adolescents.
Authors: Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Asti Jackson; Meghan Morean; Grace Kong; Krysten W Bold; Deepa R Camenga; Dana A Cavallo; Patricia Simon; Ran Wu Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Samir Soneji; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Thomas A Wills; Adam M Leventhal; Jennifer B Unger; Laura A Gibson; JaeWon Yang; Brian A Primack; Judy A Andrews; Richard A Miech; Tory R Spindle; Danielle M Dick; Thomas Eissenberg; Robert C Hornik; Rui Dang; James D Sargent Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Eleonora Cavalca; Grace Kong; Thomas Liss; Elizabeth K Reynolds; Ty S Schepis; C W Lejuez; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-11-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Peyton A Tierney; Clarissa D Karpinski; Jessica E Brown; Wentai Luo; James F Pankow Journal: Tob Control Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Meghan E Morean; Ellyn R Butler; Krysten W Bold; Grace Kong; Deepa R Camenga; Dana A Cavallo; Patricia Simon; Stephanie S O'Malley; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Caitlin Notley; Sarah Gentry; Sharon Cox; Martin Dockrell; Michelle Havill; Angela S Attwood; Matthew Smith; Marcus R Munafò Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 7.256
Authors: Zachary B Massey; Robert T Fairman; Victoria Churchill; David L Ashley; Lucy Popova Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 3.390