| Literature DB >> 32221925 |
Arthur Günzl1, Ankita Srivastava2, Ujwala Gosavi2.
Abstract
Known transcription factors of trypanosomatid organisms are extremely divergent in amino acid sequence to their counterparts in other eukaryotes. Sequence similarity is so limited that factors have been primarily identified by functional and structural studies. In addition, trypanosomatids may have evolved factors that are specific to this group of organisms. Under these circumstances, an in vitro transcription system is invaluable as it allows for unambiguous determination of a factor's transcriptional role. Here we describe procedures for the preparation of transcriptionally active extracts, detail in vitro transcription reactions, and specify the particular strategy necessary to detect template-derived RNA in this system. As examples of how to use this system, we describe factor depletion from extract and antibody-mediated interference with a factor's transcriptional function. Furthermore, we detail a promoter pull-down assay that makes use of the extracts and facilitates analysis of a factor's interaction with promoter DNA.Entities:
Keywords: Extract preparation; In vitro transcription; Primer extension; Promoter pull-down assay; Radiolabeling of DNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32221925 PMCID: PMC7337167 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0294-2_16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Methods Mol Biol ISSN: 1064-3745
Fig. 1In vitro transcription assay. Template DNAs harbor a promoter region with essential sequence elements (dark blue and black rectangles), the transcription initiation site (TIS, indicated by a flag), and unrelated tag sequences downstream of the TIS. The tags are placed at different distances from the flag to generate differently sized transcription signals. After the transcription reaction, total RNA is prepared and radiolabeled, tag-complementary oligonucleotides are annealed to template-derived transcripts. Reverse transcription extends these primers until the enzyme reaches the 5′ ends of the RNAs. Finally, radiolabeled extension products are separated on denaturing 50% urea/6% PAA gels and visualized by autoradiography. The bottom panels show cotranscription of the SLins19 and GPEET-trm templates. SLins19 contains the RNA pol II-recruiting promoter of the SL RNA gene, and GPEET-trm the RNA pol I-specific GPEET procyclin promoter template. On the left, an essential basal factor for RNA pol II transcription was depleted from extract (factor depl) which specifically abolished SLins19 transcription. Mock treatment of extract with control beads did not have this specific effect. Adding back purified factor (+ factor) partially restored SLins19 transcription in a dose-dependent manner whereas a similarly derived control factor (+ ctrl) did not restore transcription. As shown on the right, treatment of extract with anti-TFIIB immune serum (α-TFIIB) or with anti-CITFA serum (α-CITFA) abolished SLins19 and GPEET-trm transcription, respectively, whereas a nonspecific immune serum (control IS) had no effect on GPEET transcription and marginally affected SLins19 transcription
Fig. 2Schematic outline of the promoter pull-down assay. A promoter region is amplified by PCR with one oligonucleotide carrying a biotin group at its 5′ end. The biotinylated promoter DNA is coupled to streptavidin beads and incubated with extract under transcription conditions. After washing the beads, DNA-bound proteins are eluted in SDS buffer and analyzed by standard immunoblotting. Blue rectangles and the flag denote promoter sequence elements and the transcription initiation site (TIS), respectively