Literature DB >> 32221803

Salivary metabolites to detect patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Daniele Xavier Assad1,2, Elisa Cançado Porto Mascarenhas1,3, Caroline Lourenço de Lima1, Isabela Porto de Toledo1, Hélène Chardin4,5, Audrey Combes4, Ana Carolina Acevedo1, Eliete Neves Silva Guerra6.   

Abstract

Novel adjunctive screening aids are needed to reduce the morbidity and mortality related to cancer, and every effort should be made for early diagnosis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate salivary metabolites and their diagnostic value in patients with cancer.The systematic review was performed in two phases and included studies that focused on the diagnostic value of salivary metabolites in humans with solid malignant neoplasms. Five electronic databases were searched, and the risk of bias in individual studies was evaluated using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria (QUADAS-2). All procedures were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.Of the 1151 studies retrieved, 25 were included; 13 studies used targeted and 12 untargeted metabolomics approaches. Most studies included patients with breast and oral cancer. Except for one, all studies had case-control designs, and none fulfilled all quality assessments. Overall, 140 salivary metabolites were described. The most frequently reported metabolites were alanine, valine, and leucine. Among the 11 studies that reported diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) values, proline, threonine, and histidine in combination and monoacylglycerol alone demonstrated the highest DTA for breast cancer. Combined choline, betaine, pipecolinic acid, and L-carnitine showed better discriminatory performance for early oral cancer.This systematic review highlights the current evidence on salivary metabolites that may be used as a future strategy to diagnose cancer. Further studies including larger sample sizes with confirmation of the results by untargeted analysis are warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Metabolomics; Saliva; Systematic review

Year:  2020        PMID: 32221803     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01660-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  8 in total

Review 1.  Salivary metabolomics for the diagnosis of periodontal diseases: a systematic review with methodological quality assessment.

Authors:  Giacomo Baima; Giovanni Iaderosa; Filippo Citterio; Silvia Grossi; Federica Romano; Giovanni N Berta; Nurcan Buduneli; Mario Aimetti
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  Potential Diagnostic Significance of Salivary Copper Determination in Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lyudmila V Bel'skaya; Elena A Sarf; Sergey P Shalygin; Tatyana V Postnova; Victor K Kosenok
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Combining Field-Enabled Capillary Vibrating Sharp-Edge Spray Ionization with Microflow Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry to Enhance 'Omics Analyses.

Authors:  Sandra N Majuta; Anthony DeBastiani; Peng Li; Stephen J Valentine
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 4.  Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Koopaie; Sajad Kolahdooz; Mahnaz Fatahzadeh; Soheila Manifar
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.711

5.  «Salivaomics» of Different Molecular Biological Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lyudmila V Bel'skaya; Elena A Sarf
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.976

Review 6.  Salivary Stress/Immunological Markers in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Alberto Finamore; Ilaria Peluso; Omar Cauli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Aging-Related Metabolic Dysfunction in the Salivary Gland: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Nguyen Khanh Toan; Sang-Gun Ahn
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Oral Cancer Screening: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  S Warnakulasuriya; A R Kerr
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.116

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.