Literature DB >> 32221785

Incidence of high grade gliomas presenting as radiographically non-enhancing lesions: experience in 111 surgically treated non-enhancing gliomas with tissue diagnosis.

Daniel G Eichberg1, Long Di2, Alexis A Morell2, Ashish H Shah2, Alexa M Semonche2, Christopher N Chin2, Rita G Bhatia3, Aria M Jamshidi2, Evan M Luther2, Ricardo J Komotar2,4, Michael E Ivan2,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma are usually assumed to be low grade glioma (LGG), some high grade glioma (HGG) do not enhance, which may lead to a delay in biopsy and/or resection, diagnosis, and treatment initiation. Thus, there is a clear need for a large-sample study that quantifies the rate of malignant, non-enhancing gliomas.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our series of 561 consecutive surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis, 111 of which were non-enhancing, to determine the prevalence of high-grade histology in radiographically presumed LGG. Relative expression of tumor markers were also reported for non-enhancing lesions to investigate genetic correlates.
RESULTS: We identified 561 surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis from August 2012 to July 2018 and found that 111 patients (19.8%) demonstrated non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma on preoperative MRI. Thirty-one (27.9%) of the non-enhancing lesions were classified as HGGs (WHO Grade III or IV). Non-enhancing lesions were four times more likely to be HGG in patients older than 60 years than patients younger than 35 years (41.2% vs. 11.4%, Pearson Chi2 p < 0.001). Binomial logistic regression showed a significant inverse effect of age on the presence of IDH mutation in non-enhancing HGGs (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: A clinically significant proportion (27.9%) of non-enhancing lesions were found to be HGG on final pathologic diagnosis. Thus, in patients with good functional and health status, especially those older than 60 years, we recommend obtaining tissue diagnosis of all lesions suspected to be glioma, even those that are non-enhancing, to guide diagnosis as well as early initiation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhancing; Glioblastoma multiforme; Glioma; High grade glioma; Low grade glioma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32221785     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03474-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  5 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Arterial Spin Labeling-Guided Sub-Volume Segmentation of Radiotherapy in Adult Non-Enhancing Low-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  Zihong Zhu; Guanzhong Gong; Lizhen Wang; Ya Su; Jie Lu; Yong Yin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  The diagnostic value of contrast enhancement on MRI in diffuse and anaplastic gliomas.

Authors:  Aleksandrs Krigers; Matthias Demetz; Astrid E Grams; Claudius Thomé; Christian F Freyschlag
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Noninvasive differentiation of molecular subtypes of adult nonenhancing glioma using MRI perfusion and diffusion parameters.

Authors:  Ilanah J Pruis; Stephan R Koene; Sebastian R van der Voort; Fatih Incekara; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Martin J van den Bent; Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt; Rishi D S Nandoe Tewarie; Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van Zanten; Marion Smits
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-02-21

4.  Acute progression of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation diagnosed by biopsy in an elderly patient: A case report.

Authors:  Kiyonori Kuwahara; Shigeta Moriya; Ichiro Nakahara; Tadashi Kumai; Shingo Maeda; Yuya Nishiyama; Midoriko Watanabe; Yoshikazu Mizoguchi; Yuichi Hirose
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  DCE-MRI in Glioma, Infiltration Zone and Healthy Brain to Assess Angiogenesis: A Biopsy Study.

Authors:  Vera C Keil; Gerrit H Gielen; Bogdan Pintea; Peter Baumgarten; Angeliki Datsi; Kanishka Hittatiya; Matthias Simon; Elke Hattingen
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.649

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.