Literature DB >> 32221783

Reconstruction after endoscopic surgery for skull base malignancies.

Carl H Snyderman1,2, Eric W Wang3, Georgios A Zenonos4, Paul A Gardner4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ability to resect malignancies of the ventral skull base using endoscopic endonasal approaches has created a need for effective endoscopic reconstructive techniques. The purpose of this review is to summarize current techniques for reconstruction of large skull base defects during endoscopic endonasal surgery.
METHODS: Recent medical literature was reviewed to identify techniques and best practices for repair of skull base defects during endoscopic endonasal surgery. Preference was given to evidence-based recommendations.
RESULTS: Superior results are observed with multilayer inlay/onlay grafts supplemented with vascularized flaps. The nasoseptal flap is the primary reconstructive flap for most defects; secondary choices include the lateral nasal wall flap and extracranial pericranial flap. Clival defects are particularly challenging and are further augmented with adipose tissue to prevent pontine herniation. Perioperative management including the use of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage minimizes the risk of a postoperative leak in high-risk patients. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks are managed similarly to primary leaks and may require use of a secondary vascularized flap. Complications of reconstructive flaps include flap necrosis and cosmetic nasal deformity.
CONCLUSION: Large defects of the anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae can be managed similarly by adhering to basic principles of reconstruction. Future developments will improve stratification of patients into reconstructive groups and allow tailored reconstructive algorithms. New biomaterials may replace autologous tissue and facilitate endoscopic repair. Improved monitoring will allow for assessment of the reconstructive site with early detection and repair of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic endonasal surgery; Lateral nasal wall flap; Nasoseptal flap; Pericranial flap; Reconstruction

Year:  2020        PMID: 32221783     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03465-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  6 in total

1.  The impact of expanded endoscopic approaches on oncologic and functional outcomes for clival malignancies:a case series.

Authors:  Franco DeMonte; Shaan M Raza; Solon Schur; Joel Z Passer; Ehab Y Hanna; Shirley Y Su; Michael E Kupferman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach for reduction of a lateral recess encephalocele with postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.

Authors:  Adham M Khalafallah; Omar G Ahmed; Nicholas R Rowan; Debraj Mukherjee
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 3.  Vascular pedicled flaps for skull base defect reconstruction.

Authors:  Wade R Gutierrez; Douglas M Bennion; Jarrett E Walsh; Scott R Owen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-15

4.  Pedicled frontal periosteal rescue flap via eyebrow incision for skull base reconstruction (SevEN-002).

Authors:  Chang Ki Jang; Soo Jeong Park; Eui Hyun Kim; Jin Mo Cho; Ju Hyung Moon; Kyoung Su Sung; Je Beom Hong; Jaejoon Joon Lim; Minkyun Na; Chang-Ki Hong; Tae Hoon Roh; Jiwoong Oh
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.030

Review 5.  Interdisciplinary challenges and aims of flap or graft reconstruction surgery of sinonasal cancers: What radiologists and radiation oncologists need to know.

Authors:  Florent Carsuzaa; Benjamin Verillaud; Pierre-Yves Marcy; Philippe Herman; Xavier Dufour; Valentin Favier; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Skull base repair following endonasal pituitary and skull base tumour resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danyal Z Khan; Ahmad M S Ali; Chan Hee Koh; Neil L Dorward; Joan Grieve; Hugo Layard Horsfall; William Muirhead; Thomas Santarius; Wouter R Van Furth; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.107

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.