| Literature DB >> 32221013 |
Rosa Nguyen1,2, Natasha Sahr3, April Sykes3, Mary Beth McCarville4, Sara M Federico1, Amanda Sooter5, David Cullins5, Barbara Rooney5, William E Janssen5, Aimee C Talleur5, Brandon M Triplett5, Gwendolyn Anthony1, Michael A Dyer6,7, Alberto S Pappo1, Wing H Leung5,8, Wayne L Furman9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Natural killer (NK) cells are one of the main effector populations of immunotherapy with monoclonal antibody and cytokines, used in combination with chemotherapy to treat children with high-risk neuroblastoma on this phase II trial. However, the impact of chemoimmunotherapy on NK cell kinetics, phenotype, and function is understudied.Entities:
Keywords: immunology; oncology; paediatric
Year: 2020 PMID: 32221013 PMCID: PMC7206969 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 13.751
Figure 1(A) Therapy regimen and time points of longitudinal NK cell studies. Patients received six induction courses but NK cell studies were only conducted during course 1, 3 and 4. (B) Flow diagram of patients included in the study and individual tests. Patients with missing data for specific time points were excluded resulting in deviation from the original number of patients. BMT, bone marrow transplantation; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; HPCs, hematopoietic progenitor cells; IL-2, interleukin-2; KIR, killer immunoglobulin-like receptor; NK, natural killer.
Clinical characteristics of studied patient cohort
| Demographic and clinical summary | n=63 |
| Age at diagnosis, year | |
| Median | 3.3 |
| Median | 0.5–15.2 |
| Sex (%) | |
| Female | 26 (41.3) |
| Male | 37 (58.7) |
| Race (%) | |
| White | 42 (66.7) |
| African American | 18 (28.6) |
| Other | 3 (4.8) |
| INSS stage (%) | |
| 2B | 1 (1.6) |
| 3 | 7 (11.1) |
| 4 | 55 (87.3) |
| Not amplified | 41 (65.1) |
| Amplified | 21 (33.3) |
| Unknown | 1 (1.6) |
| Shimada histology (%) | |
| Favorable | 5 (7.9) |
| Unfavorable | 40 (69.6) |
| Unknown | 18 (28.6) |
| Survival status (%) | |
| Alive | 56 (88.9) |
| Deceased | 7 (11.1) |
| Autologous transplant (%) | |
| Yes | 57 (90.5) |
| No | 5 (7.9) |
| Unknown | 1 (1.6) |
| Haploidentical NK cell therapy as part of autologous transplant | |
| NK cell donor | |
| Father | 16 (51.6) |
| Mother | 15 (48.4) |
| Infused NK cell dose, ×106/kg median (range) | |
| Median | 20.7 |
| Range | 3.0–114.0 |
| Infused NKT cell dose, ×106/kg | |
| Median | 0.01 |
| Range | 0.00–0.10 |
| Infused T cell dose, ×106/kg | |
| Median | 0.00 |
| Range | 0.00–0.01 |
| Donor KIR—patient HLA mismatch (%) | |
| Yes | 17 (54.8) |
| No | 14 (45.2) |
| Donor KIR mismatch against (%) | |
| KIR2DL1 | 13 (41.9) |
| KIR2DL2/3 | 1 (3.2) |
| KIR3DL1 | 8 (25.8) |
| Autologous HLA–KIR mismatch (%) | |
| Yes | 16 (51.6) |
| No | 15 (48.4) |
| NK cell chimerism on day 7 after infusion | |
| No patients | 22 |
| Median (% donor) | 5 |
| Range | 0.0–81.0 |
| NK cell chimerism on day 21 after infusion | |
| No patients | 26 |
| Median (% donor) | 0.0 |
| Range | 0.0–35.0 |
HLA, human leukocyte antigen; INSS, International Neuroblastoma Staging System; KIR, killer immunoglobulin-like receptor; NK, natural killer.
Figure 2Box plot of CD16+ (A) and total NK cells per μL (B) (transformed scale as detailed in statistical methods) by time point. (C) Individual alloreactive NK cell counts on days 7 and 21 after adoptive transfer of haploidentical and HLA-KIR-mismatched NK cells. Complete (CR), very good partial (VGPR), partial response (PR) (n = 8) are shown as solid lines and those with stable disease (SD) (n=4) as a dashed line. NK, natural killer.
Figure 3(A) Forest plot of NK cytotoxicity by time point. The forest plot summarizes the results of a generalized estimating equation model of time and condition adjusting for the repeated effect of patient on ex vivo kill. The reference group for time is diagnosis. The reference group for medium is resting. Estimates and 95% CIs are presented as points and lines, respectively. (B) Box plot of specific lysis by activation status and time point. (C) Unbiased and unsupervised cluster analysis identified two distinct patient clusters. (D) Demographic, tumor-related, and hematological features are listed and compared between the two patient clusters. CR, complete response; IL-2, interleukin-2; NK, natural killer; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; VGPR, very good partial response.