Literature DB >> 32220742

Mapping the spatial sources of atmospheric dust using GLUE and Monte Carlo simulation.

Hamid Gholami1, Setareh Rahimi2, Aboalhasan Fathabadi3, Samaneh Habibi4, Adrian L Collins5.   

Abstract

Atmospheric dust has many negative impacts within different ecosystems and it is therefore beneficial to assemble reliable evidence on the key sources of the dust problem. In this study, for first time, two different source modelling approaches comprising generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) and Monte Carlo simulation were applied to map spatial source contributions to atmospheric dust samples collected in Ahvaz, Khuzestan province, Iran. A total of 264 surficial soil samples were collected from five potential spatial dust sources. Additionally, nine dust samples were collected in February 2015. The performance of both GLUE and Monte Carlo simulation for quantifying uncertainty associated with the source contributions predicted using an un-mixing model were assessed and compared using mean absolute fit (MAF) and goodness-of-fit (GOF) estimators as well as 14 virtual sediment mixtures (VSM). Finally, the erodible fraction (EF) of topsoils and HYSPLIT model were used as further tests for validating the results of the GLUE and Monte Caro simulation. Based on both uncertainty modelling approaches, the loamy sand soil texture was recognized as the main spatial source of the target dust samples. Silty clay soils were estimated to be the least important spatial source of the target dust samples using the two modelling approaches. Both GLUE and Monte Carlo simulation returned MAF and GOF estimates >80%, with Monte Carlo performing slightly better. Based on the virtual mixture tests, the RMSE and MAE of the Monte Carlo simulation (<13.5% and <11%, respectively) was better than for GLUE (<20% and <16.3%, respectively). Spatial source maps generated using both GLUE and Monte Carlo simulation were consistent with the EF map generated using multiple regression (MR) and with routes dust transportation detected by HYSPLIT. Therefore, we recommend that future research into to the sources of atmospheric dust pollution integrates modelling approaches, VSM, EF and HYSPLIT model to quantify and map dust provenance reliably.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Atmospheric dust; Erodible factor; GLUE; Monte Carlo simulation; Soil texture; Spatial source; Virtual sediment mixtures

Year:  2020        PMID: 32220742     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Dust Sources and Airborne Bacteria in the Southwest of Iran.

Authors:  Maryam Sorkheh; Hossein Mohammad Asgari; Isaac Zamani; Farshid Ghanbari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.190

2.  Sediment source fingerprinting: benchmarking recent outputs, remaining challenges and emerging themes.

Authors:  Adrian L Collins; Martin Blackwell; Pascal Boeckx; Charlotte-Anne Chivers; Monica Emelko; Olivier Evrard; Ian Foster; Allen Gellis; Hamid Gholami; Steve Granger; Paul Harris; Arthur J Horowitz; J Patrick Laceby; Nuria Martinez-Carreras; Jean Minella; Lisa Mol; Kazem Nosrati; Simon Pulley; Uldis Silins; Yuri Jacques da Silva; Micheal Stone; Tales Tiecher; Hari Ram Upadhayay; Yusheng Zhang
Journal:  J Soils Sediments       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.308

3.  Mapping wind erosion hazard with regression-based machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Hamid Gholami; Aliakbar Mohammadifar; Dieu Tien Bui; Adrian L Collins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Fingerprinting the spatial sources of fine-grained sediment deposited in the bed of the Mehran River, southern Iran.

Authors:  Atefe Fatahi; Hamid Gholami; Yahya Esmaeilpour; Aboalhasan Fathabadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.