Literature DB >> 32220688

Investigating the distribution and regional occurrence of anthropogenic litter in English marine protected areas using 25 years of citizen-science beach clean data.

Sarah E Nelms1, Lauren Eyles2, Brendan J Godley3, Peter B Richardson2, Hazel Selley4, Jean-Luc Solandt2, Matthew J Witt5.   

Abstract

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are designated to enable the management of damaging activities within a discrete spatial area, and can be effective at reducing the associated impacts, including habitat loss and over-exploitation. Such sites, however, may be exposed to the potential impacts from broader scale pressures, such as anthropogenic litter, due to its diffuse nature and lack of constraint by legislative and/or political boundaries. Plastic, a large component of litter, is of particular concern, due to increasing evidence of its potential to cause ecological and socio-economic damage. The presence of sensitive marine features may mean that some MPAs are at greater potential risk from the impacts of plastic pollution than some non-protected sites. Understanding the abundance, distribution and composition of litter along coastlines is important for designing and implementing effective management strategies. Gathering such data, however, can be expensive and time-consuming but litter survey programmes that enlist citizen scientists are often able to resolve many of the logistical or financial constraints. Here, we examine data collected over 25-years (1994-2018), by Marine Conservation Society volunteers, for spatial patterns in relation to the English MPA network, with the aim of highlighting key sources of litter and identifying management priority areas. We found that MPAs in southeast (Kent) and southwest (Cornwall and Devon) England have the highest densities of shore-based litter. Plastic is the main material constituent and public littering the most common identifiable source. Items attributed to fishing activities were most prevalent in southwest MPAs and sewage related debris was highest in MPAs near large rivers and estuaries, indicating localised accumulation. When comparing inside and outside of MPAs, we found no difference in litter density, demonstrating the need for wider policy intervention at local, national and international scales to reduce the amount of litter.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Citizen-science; Litter; Marine protected areas; Plastic pollution; Policy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32220688     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  3 in total

1.  Rapid Characterization of Macroplastic Input and Leakage in the Ganges River Basin.

Authors:  Kathryn Youngblood; Amy Brooks; Navin Das; Avinash Singh; Meherun Sultana; Gaurav Verma; Tania Zakir; Gawsia W Chowdhury; Emily Duncan; Hina Khatoon; Taylor Maddalene; Imogen Napper; Sarah Nelms; Surshti Patel; Victoria Sturges; Jenna R Jambeck
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Drivers of public plastic (mis)use - New insights from changes in single-use plastic usage during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Debbie Winton; Luca Marazzi; Steven Loiselle
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 10.753

3.  Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Manuel Córdova; Allan Pinto; Christina Carrozzo Hellevik; Saleh Abdel-Afou Alaliyat; Ibrahim A Hameed; Helio Pedrini; Ricardo da S Torres
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.