Tan N Doan1,2,3, Luke Adams1, Brendan V Schultz1, Denise Bunting1, Lachlan Parker1, Stephen Rashford1,4, Emma Bosley1,5. 1. Queensland Ambulance Service, Queensland Government Department of Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 2. Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. 4. School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 5. School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-induced consciousness patients from a large database of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: Included were adult patients, attended between January 2007 and December 2018 by the Queensland Ambulance Service, where resuscitation was attempted by paramedics. Manual review of records was undertaken to identify CPR-induced consciousness cases. Patients exhibiting purposeful limb/body movement during CPR, with or without displaying other signs, were considered to be CPR-induced consciousness. Characteristics and outcomes of CPR-induced consciousness patients were compared to those without CPR-induced consciousness. RESULTS: A total of 23 011 OHCA patients were included; of these, 52 (0.23%) were CPR-induced consciousness. This translates into an incidence rate of 2.3 cases per 1000 adult resuscitation attempts over 12 years. Combativeness/agitation was the most common sign of CPR-induced consciousness, described in 34.6% (18/52) of patients. CPR-induced consciousness patients had numerically higher rates of return of spontaneous circulation on hospital arrival (51.9% vs 28.6%), discharge survival (46.2% vs 15.1%) and 30-day survival (46.2% vs 14.7%), than those without CPR-induced consciousness; however, CPR-induced consciousness was not found to be an independent predictor of survival. Higher proportions of CPR-induced consciousness patients had arrest witnessed by paramedics, occurring in public places, of cardiac aetiology and initial shockable rhythm, than patients without CPR-induced consciousness. CONCLUSIONS: CPR-induced consciousness in OHCA appears to be associated with higher survival rates. Standardised guidelines on recognition and management of CPR-induced consciousness remain to be established.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-induced consciousness patients from a large database of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: Included were adult patients, attended between January 2007 and December 2018 by the Queensland Ambulance Service, where resuscitation was attempted by paramedics. Manual review of records was undertaken to identify CPR-induced consciousness cases. Patients exhibiting purposeful limb/body movement during CPR, with or without displaying other signs, were considered to be CPR-induced consciousness. Characteristics and outcomes of CPR-induced consciousness patients were compared to those without CPR-induced consciousness. RESULTS: A total of 23 011 OHCA patients were included; of these, 52 (0.23%) were CPR-induced consciousness. This translates into an incidence rate of 2.3 cases per 1000 adult resuscitation attempts over 12 years. Combativeness/agitation was the most common sign of CPR-induced consciousness, described in 34.6% (18/52) of patients. CPR-induced consciousness patients had numerically higher rates of return of spontaneous circulation on hospital arrival (51.9% vs 28.6%), discharge survival (46.2% vs 15.1%) and 30-day survival (46.2% vs 14.7%), than those without CPR-induced consciousness; however, CPR-induced consciousness was not found to be an independent predictor of survival. Higher proportions of CPR-induced consciousness patients had arrest witnessed by paramedics, occurring in public places, of cardiac aetiology and initial shockable rhythm, than patients without CPR-induced consciousness. CONCLUSIONS: CPR-induced consciousness in OHCA appears to be associated with higher survival rates. Standardised guidelines on recognition and management of CPR-induced consciousness remain to be established.
Authors: Myra H Wyckoff; Eunice M Singletary; Jasmeet Soar; Theresa M Olasveengen; Robert Greif; Helen G Liley; David Zideman; Farhan Bhanji; Lars W Andersen; Suzanne R Avis; Khalid Aziz; Jason C Bendall; David C Berry; Vere Borra; Bernd W Böttiger; Richard Bradley; Janet E Bray; Jan Breckwoldt; Jestin N Carlson; Pascal Cassan; Maaret Castrén; Wei-Tien Chang; Nathan P Charlton; Adam Cheng; Sung Phil Chung; Julie Considine; Daniela T Costa-Nobre; Keith Couper; Katie N Dainty; Peter G Davis; Maria Fernanda de Almeida; Allan R de Caen; Edison F de Paiva; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Matthew J Douma; Ian R Drennan; Jonathan P Duff; Kathryn J Eastwood; Walid El-Naggar; Jonathan L Epstein; Raffo Escalante; Jorge G Fabres; Joe Fawke; Judith C Finn; Elizabeth E Foglia; Fredrik Folke; Karoline Freeman; Elaine Gilfoyle; Craig A Goolsby; Amy Grove; Ruth Guinsburg; Tetsuo Hatanaka; Mary Fran Hazinski; George S Heriot; Karen G Hirsch; Mathias J Holmberg; Shigeharu Hosono; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Kevin K C Hung; Cindy H Hsu; Takanari Ikeyama; Tetsuya Isayama; Vishal S Kapadia; Mandira Daripa Kawakami; Han-Suk Kim; David A Kloeck; Peter J Kudenchuk; Anthony T Lagina; Kasper G Lauridsen; Eric J Lavonas; Andrew S Lockey; Carolina Malta Hansen; David Markenson; Tasuku Matsuyama; Christopher J D McKinlay; Amin Mehrabian; Raina M Merchant; Daniel Meyran; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Kevin J Nation; Michael Nemeth; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Susan Niermeyer; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Chika Nishiyama; Brian J O'Neil; Aaron M Orkin; Osokogu Osemeke; Michael J Parr; Catherine Patocka; Jeffrey L Pellegrino; Gavin D Perkins; Jeffrey M Perlman; Yacov Rabi; Joshua C Reynolds; Giuseppe Ristagno; Charles C Roehr; Tetsuya Sakamoto; Claudio Sandroni; Taylor Sawyer; Georg M Schmölzer; Sebastian Schnaubelt; Federico Semeraro; Markus B Skrifvars; Christopher M Smith; Michael A Smyth; Roger F Soll; Takahiro Sugiura; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Daniele Trevisanuto; Christian Vaillancourt; Tzong-Luen Wang; Gary M Weiner; Michelle Welsford; Jane Wigginton; Jonathan P Wyllie; Joyce Yeung; Jerry P Nolan; Katherine M Berg Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 5.262