| Literature DB >> 32219887 |
Jacopo Fumagalli1, Lorenzo Rosso2,3, Francesca Gori1, Letizia Corinna Morlacchi4, Valeria Rossetti4, Paolo Tarsia4, Francesco Blasi3,4, Ilaria Righi2, Paolo Mendogni2, Alessandro Palleschi2, Davide Tosi2, Gianluca Bonitta2, Mario Nosotti2,3, Elena Benazzi5, Vittorio Scaravilli1, Franco Valenza3,6, Giacomo Grasselli1,3, Alberto Zanella1,3.
Abstract
Outcomes after transplantation of lungs (LuTX) treated with ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) are debated. In a single-center 8 years of retrospective analysis, we compared: donors' and recipients' characteristics, gas exchange and lung mechanics at ICU admission, 3, 6, and 12 months, and patients' survival of LuTX from standard donors compared with EVLP-treated grafts. A total of 193 LuTX were performed. Thirty-one LuTX, out of 50 EVLP procedures, were carried out: 7 from nonheart beating and 24 from extended criteria brain-dead donors. Recipients' characteristics were similar. At ICU admission, compared with standard donors, EVLP patients had worse PaO2 /FiO2 [276 (206; 374) vs. 204 (133; 245) mmHg, P < 0.05], more frequent extracorporeal support (18% vs. 32%, P = 0.053) and longer mechanical ventilation duration [28 days of ventilator-free days: 27 (24; 28) vs. 26 (19; 27), P < 0.05]. ICU length of stay [4 (2; 9) vs. 6 (3; 12) days, P = 0.208], 28-day survival (99% vs. 97%, P = 0.735), and 1-year respiratory function were similar between groups. Log-rank analysis (median follow-up 2.5 years) demonstrated similar patients' survival (P = 0.439) and time free of chronic lung allograft disease (P = 0.484). The EVLP program increased by 16% the number of LuTX. Compared to standard donors, EVLP patients had worse respiratory function immediately after LuTX but similar early and mid-term outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: ex-vivo lung perfusion; lung transplantation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32219887 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transpl Int ISSN: 0934-0874 Impact factor: 3.782