Ahna L H Pai1,2, Marie L Chardon1, Constance A Mara1,2, Nathan L Basile1, Lisa A Schwartz3, Sean Phipps4. 1. Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. 2. Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine. 3. Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. 4. Behavioral Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Develop and evaluate the preliminary validity of a self-report measure of parents' treatment-related efficacy and control, Parental Efficacy and Control Questionnaire-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (PECQ-HCT), in a pediatric HCT sample. METHODS: Participants included 185 parents of children (≤12 years old) receiving HCT participating in a larger, longitudinal study. Parents completed the PECQ-HCT as well as measures of social problem-solving skills, collective family efficacy, family beliefs, and parental distress. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis results indicated that a 37-item four-factor model was the best fitting and most theoretically sound, χ2(df = 1,596) = 14,089.95, p < .01, comparative fit index = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.90, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.07. Preliminary subscale scores demonstrated adequate internal consistency as well as good content and criterion-related validity. CONCLUSIONS: If replicated using a confirmatory factor analysis in a separate sample, these findings suggest that the four-factor PECQ-HCT measure may be useful for measuring HCT-related parental efficacy and perceived control.
OBJECTIVE: Develop and evaluate the preliminary validity of a self-report measure of parents' treatment-related efficacy and control, Parental Efficacy and Control Questionnaire-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (PECQ-HCT), in a pediatric HCT sample. METHODS:Participants included 185 parents of children (≤12 years old) receiving HCT participating in a larger, longitudinal study. Parents completed the PECQ-HCT as well as measures of social problem-solving skills, collective family efficacy, family beliefs, and parental distress. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis results indicated that a 37-item four-factor model was the best fitting and most theoretically sound, χ2(df = 1,596) = 14,089.95, p < .01, comparative fit index = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.90, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.07. Preliminary subscale scores demonstrated adequate internal consistency as well as good content and criterion-related validity. CONCLUSIONS: If replicated using a confirmatory factor analysis in a separate sample, these findings suggest that the four-factor PECQ-HCT measure may be useful for measuring HCT-related parental efficacy and perceived control.
Authors: David A Fedele; Stephanie E Hullmann; Mark Chaffin; Carole Kenner; Mark J Fisher; Katherine Kirk; Angelica R Eddington; Sean Phipps; Rene Y McNall-Knapp; Larry L Mullins Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2013-03-07
Authors: Lisa Jobe-Shields; Melissa A Alderfer; Maru Barrera; Kathryn Vannatta; Joseph M Currier; Sean Phipps Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Amy M Peterson; Felicity W K Harper; Terrance L Albrecht; Jeffrey W Taub; Heather Orom; Sean Phipps; Louis A Penner Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 1.636