Literature DB >> 32219174

Decision making and the use of evidence based practice: Is the three-legged stool balanced?

Rebecca E Stewart1, Dianne L Chambless1, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman2.   

Abstract

This article presents the results of a qualitative analysis of interviews with 25 psychologists in independent practice, with a focus on decision making with a selected patient. We endeavored to examine how clinical decision making intersected with the principles of evidence based practice (EBP) as laid out by Spring (2007). Clinicians reported that diagnostic impressions were generally formulated through unstructured assessment rather than validated instruments, and that treatment selection was based on therapists' perceptions of a treatment's match with client characteristics. Therapists viewed CBTs as appropriate for addressing symptoms but believed they needed to depart from CBT strategies to address underlying issues. Nonetheless, they often defined successes and failures in treatment in terms of symptoms. Overall, clinicians rarely mentioned utilization of research evidence for assessment or treatment selection and practice. Results are discussed within the framework of EBP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case study; decision making in clinical practice; evidence based practice; evidence-based assessment; psychotherapy practice

Year:  2018        PMID: 32219174      PMCID: PMC7098661          DOI: 10.1037/pri0000063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Innov (Wash D C)        ISSN: 2377-889X


  1 in total

1.  Usability Issues in Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions and Implementation Strategies: Cross-project Analysis.

Authors:  Sean A Munson; Emily C Friedman; Katie Osterhage; Ryan Allred; Michael D Pullmann; Patricia A Areán; Aaron R Lyon
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.