| Literature DB >> 32219107 |
Md Iftekhar Younus1, Abdullah Al Momen Sabuj1, Zobayda Farzana Haque1, Sheikh Mohammad Sayem2, Shankar Majumder2, Mst Sonia Parvin3, Md Alimul Islam1, Sukumar Saha1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study was aimed to analyze the microbiological quality of mixed vegetable salads and to understand the risk related with its consumption from different restaurants around Bangladesh Agricultural University campus in Mymensingh.Entities:
Keywords: BAU; Monte Carlo simulation; Restaurants; risk analysis; salad
Year: 2019 PMID: 32219107 PMCID: PMC7096123 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2020.g390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
Microbial load of RTE vegetables salad samples.
| Code of Restaurants | Microbial load (log cfu/gm ± Standard deviation) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | ||||
| TRR | 8.35 ± 0.39 | 6.22 ± 0.48 | 4.75 ± 0.08 | 5.53 ± 0.38 |
| BBR | 9.04 ± 0.26 | 6.17 ± 0.35 | 5.27 ± 0.53 | 6.66 ± 0.80 |
| MDR | 8.47 ± 0.36 | 6.42 ± 0.53 | - | 5.98 ± 0.42 |
| MLR | 8.30 ± 0.54 | 4.64 ± 0.61 | - | 5.83 ± 0.08 |
| HDR | 7.73 ± 0.61 | 5.66 ± 0.37 | - | 5.80 ± 0.12 |
| BSR | 8.45 ± 0.47 | 5.67 ± 0.10 | - | 5.73 ± 0.11 |
| MNR | 7.80 ± 0.11 | 5.90 ± 0.20 | - | 5.75 ± 0.08 |
| SLR | 8.60 ± 0.34 | 5.53 ± 0.21 | - | 5.77 ± 0.12 |
| MMR | 8.46 ± 0.38 | 5.69 ± 0.58 | - | 5.76 ± 0.25 |
| MYR | 8.47 ± 0.35 | 5.48 ± 0.20 | - | 5.94 ± 0.38 |
| SFR | 8.24 ± 0.28 | 5.89 ± 0.69 | - | 5.91 ± 0.20 |
| APR | 8.21 ± 0.67 | 5.49 ± 0.36 | - | 4.98 ± 0.20 |
TRR = Tripty Restaurant, BBR = Bhai Bhai Restaurant, MDR = Madina Restaurant, MLR = Milon Restaurant, HDR = Hridoy Restaurant, BSR = Bismillah Restaurant, MNR = Minar Restaurant, SLR = Shiuly Restaurant, MMR = Mama Restaurant, MYR = Mayamoy Restaurant, SFR = Shafiq Restaurant, APR = Apu Restaurant.
Salad handling practices details.
| Parameter | Parameter | Frequency ( | Percentages (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Types of salad | Cucumber | 12 | 100 |
| Tomato | 4 | 33.33 | |
| Carrot | 8 | 66.67 | |
| Mixed | 12 | 100 | |
| Salad stored or kept for sale | Room temperature | 12 | 100 |
| Refrigerator | 0 | 0 | |
| Salad served | Covered | 2 | 16.67 |
| Uncovered | 10 | 83.33 | |
| Utensil used to serve salad | Designated serving utensil | 0 | 0 |
| Shared utensil | 12 | 100 | |
| Salad served by food handlers | Gloves protected hand | 0 | 0 |
| Bare hand | 12 | 100 | |
| Any training received on hygienic food preparation and handling | Yes | 0 | 0 |
| No | 12 | 100 |
Salad consumption profile in details.
| Parameters (Consumers) | Distribution of respondents Percentage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Male | Female | Total | (%) |
| < 20 | 16 | 24 | 40 | 20 |
| 20–25 | 55 | 62 | 117 | 58.5 |
| 25–30 | 29 | 14 | 43 | 21.5 |
| Male | 100 | - | 100 | 50 |
| Female | 100 | - | 100 | 50 |
| Home | 18 | 68 | 86 | 43 |
| Canteen | 15 | 3 | 18 | 9 |
| Restaurant | 61 | 27 | 88 | 44 |
| Others | 5 | 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Once a day (frequent consumers) | 35 | 33 | 68 | 34 |
| Once a week (average consumer) | 50 | 50 | 100 | 50 |
| Once a month (occasional consumer) | 15 | 17 | 32 | 16 |
| Once a day(frequent consumers) | 19 | 13 | 32 | 36.3 |
| Once a week (average consumer) | 34 | 12 | 46 | 52.2 |
| Once a month (occasional consumer) | 8 | 2 | 10 | 11.3 |
Risk assessment of consumers of restaurants according to different parameters.
| Parameter | Consumers | No. of consumers ( | Case findings ( | Risk ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 61 | 8 | 0.13 | 13 |
| Female | 27 | 8 | 0.30 | 30 | |
| Type of consumers | Frequent | 32 | 10 | 0.31 | 31 |
| Average | 46 | 06 | 0.13 | 13 | |
| Occasional | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Age | <20 | 13 | 01 | 0.08 | 8 |
| 20–25 | 45 | 07 | 0.15 | 15 | |
| 25–30 | 30 | 08 | 0.27 | 27 |
Risk assessment of consuming RTE vegetable salads.
| Microorganisms | Mean dose of organisms per serving (CFU) | Mean probability of infection (90% CI) | Mean annual risk of infection (90% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequent consumer (daily) | Average consumer (weekly) | Occasional consumer (monthly) | |||
| 1.89 × 107 | 70% (4%–210%) | 110% (100%–203%) | 110% (100%–200%) | 110% (100%–203%) | |
| 2.4 × 106 | 90% (5%–270%) | 110% (100%–203%) | 110% (100%–206%) | 110% (100%–192%) | |
| 3.1 × 107 | 100% (5%–300%) | 110% (100%–203%) | 110% (100%–207%) | 110% (100%–194%) | |