| Literature DB >> 32219039 |
Yun Tang1,2, Zhi-Qiang Chen1,3, You-Fu Lin1,4, Jing-Yi Chen1, Guo-Hua Ding1, Xiang Ji2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tiger frog (Hoplobatrachus rugulosus) is widely raised by many farms in southern region of China as an economically edible frog. The growth, development, and sexual differentiation of amphibians are influenced by temperature and steroid hormone level. However, the problem of hormone residues is caused by the addition of exogenous hormones in frog breeding, it is worth considering whether non-sterol aromatase inhibitors can be used instead of hormones.Entities:
Keywords: Aromatase inhibitor; Hoplobatrachus rugulosus; Locomotion; Metamorphosis; Sex ratio; Tadpole; Temperature
Year: 2020 PMID: 32219039 PMCID: PMC7087491 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Metamorphosis rate of H. rugulosus tadpoles from treatments involving 2 temperatures × 3 letrozole concentrations.
Descriptive statistics, expressed as means ± SE (range), for metamorphosis time, snout–vent length, body mass and condition factor of froglets, and results of two-way ANOVAs.
| Temperature (°C) | Letrozole concentration (mg/g) | Metamorphosis time (days) | Snout–vent length (mm) | Body mass (g) | Condition factor (g/mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 0 | 26.1 ± 0.3 (23–31) | 22.0 ± 0.3 (19.9–24.1) | 1.48 ± 0.05 (1.20–2.02) | 0.067 ± 0.002 (0.055–0.085) |
| 0.1 | 26.3 ± 0.3 (23–35) | 22.1 ± 0.4 (18.6–25.0) | 1.56 ± 0.07 (1.00–2.34) | 0.070 ± 0.002 (0.054–0.093) | |
| 1 | 26.0 ± 0.3 (23–30) | 22.0 ± 0.3 (20.2–24.8) | 1.50 ± 0.09 (1.03–2.34) | 0.068 ± 0.003 (0.051–0.096) | |
| 34 | 0 | 20.8 ± 0.3 (17–25) | 21.2 ± 0.2 (19.6–23.2) | 1.36 ± 0.03 (1.11–1.69) | 0.064 ± 0.002 (0.051–0.082) |
| 0.1 | 21.0 ± 0.2 (17–28) | 21.5 ± 0.3 (19.1–24.7) | 1.32 ± 0.03 (1.09–1.67) | 0.062 ± 0.001 (0.051–0.076) | |
| 1 | 21.3 ± 0.3 (17–28) | 21.3 ± 0.3 (18.6–23.1) | 1.39 ± 0.04 (1.11–1.72) | 0.065 ± 0.002 (0.052–0.081) | |
| Statistical results | Temperature | ||||
| Letrozole concentration | |||||
| Interaction | |||||
Note:
Tukey’s post hoc comparison was performed on the trait that differed between the two temperature treatments. T29: 29 °C, T34: 34 °C.
Figure 2(A) Correlation of jumping distance with condition factor and (B) mean values (+SE) for residual of jumping distance of H. rugulosus froglets at complete metamorphosis from treatments involving 2 temperatures × 3 letrozole concentrations.
Regression equation and coefficient are indicated in the figure.
Figure 3(A) Survival rate and (B) male ratio at 90 days after complete metamorphosis in H. rugulosus from treatments involving 2 temperatures × 3 letrozole concentrations.
The sample sizes are indicated in the figure.