Wendy Marie Ingram1,2, Anna M Baker3, Christopher R Bauer4, Jason P Brown4, Fernando S Goes5, Sharon Larson2,6, Peter P Zandi1. 1. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Biomedical and Translational Informatics Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 6. College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most common mental illnesses and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Electronic Health Records (EHR) allow researchers to conduct unprecedented large-scale observational studies investigating MDD, its disease development and its interaction with other health outcomes. While there exist methods to classify patients as clear cases or controls, given specific data requirements, there are presently no simple, generalizable, and validated methods to classify an entire patient population into varying groups of depression likelihood and severity. METHODS: We have tested a simple, pragmatic electronic phenotype algorithm that classifies patients into one of five mutually exclusive, ordinal groups, varying in depression phenotype. Using data from an integrated health system on 278,026 patients from a 10-year study period we have tested the convergent validity of these constructs using measures of external validation, including patterns of psychiatric prescriptions, symptom severity, indicators of suicidality, comorbidity, mortality, health care utilization, and polygenic risk scores for MDD. RESULTS: We found consistent patterns of increasing morbidity and/or adverse outcomes across the five groups, providing evidence for convergent validity. LIMITATIONS: The study population is from a single rural integrated health system which is predominantly white, possibly limiting its generalizability. CONCLUSION: Our study provides initial evidence that a simple algorithm, generalizable to most EHR data sets, provides categories with meaningful face and convergent validity that can be used for stratification of an entire patient population.
BACKGROUND: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most common mental illnesses and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Electronic Health Records (EHR) allow researchers to conduct unprecedented large-scale observational studies investigating MDD, its disease development and its interaction with other health outcomes. While there exist methods to classify patients as clear cases or controls, given specific data requirements, there are presently no simple, generalizable, and validated methods to classify an entire patient population into varying groups of depression likelihood and severity. METHODS: We have tested a simple, pragmatic electronic phenotype algorithm that classifies patients into one of five mutually exclusive, ordinal groups, varying in depression phenotype. Using data from an integrated health system on 278,026 patients from a 10-year study period we have tested the convergent validity of these constructs using measures of external validation, including patterns of psychiatric prescriptions, symptom severity, indicators of suicidality, comorbidity, mortality, health care utilization, and polygenic risk scores for MDD. RESULTS: We found consistent patterns of increasing morbidity and/or adverse outcomes across the five groups, providing evidence for convergent validity. LIMITATIONS: The study population is from a single rural integrated health system which is predominantly white, possibly limiting its generalizability. CONCLUSION: Our study provides initial evidence that a simple algorithm, generalizable to most EHR data sets, provides categories with meaningful face and convergent validity that can be used for stratification of an entire patient population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical informatics; Depression; Electronic health records; Phenotypic algorithms
Authors: Girish N Nadkarni; Omri Gottesman; James G Linneman; Herbert Chase; Richard L Berg; Samira Farouk; Rajiv Nadukuru; Vaneet Lotay; Steve Ellis; George Hripcsak; Peggy Peissig; Chunhua Weng; Erwin P Bottinger Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2014-11-14
Authors: Heather D Anderson; Wilson D Pace; Elias Brandt; Rodney D Nielsen; Richard R Allen; Anne M Libby; David R West; Robert J Valuck Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2015 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Katherine M Newton; Peggy L Peissig; Abel Ngo Kho; Suzette J Bielinski; Richard L Berg; Vidhu Choudhary; Melissa Basford; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Rongling Li; Jennifer A Pacheco; Luke V Rasmussen; Leslie Spangler; Joshua C Denny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Lisa Dockery; Debra Jeffery; Oliver Schauman; Paul Williams; Simone Farrelly; Oliver Bonnington; Jheanell Gabbidon; Francesca Lassman; George Szmukler; Graham Thornicroft; Sarah Clement Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Isabella Slaby; Heather S Hain; Debra Abrams; Frank D Mentch; Joseph T Glessner; Patrick M A Sleiman; Hakon Hakonarson Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2022-06-11 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Charmaine S Tam; Janice Gullick; Aldo Saavedra; Stephen T Vernon; Gemma A Figtree; Clara K Chow; Michelle Cretikos; Richard W Morris; Maged William; Jonathan Morris; David Brieger Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Samuel I Berchuck; Alessandro A Jammal; David Page; Tamara J Somers; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 3.048