| Literature DB >> 32218296 |
Katarzyna Marciniak1, Janusz Maciaszek1, Magdalena Cyma-Wejchenig1, Robert Szeklicki1, Zuzanna Maćkowiak1, Dorota Sadowska2, Rafał Stemplewski1.
Abstract
Inadequate levels of physical activity among older people lead to a gradual decline in self-reliance and consequent dependence on other people. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of Nordic walking training with poles with an integrated resistance shock absorber on the functional fitness of older women. Forty-two women (Mage = 64.7 ± 3.15 years) were randomly assigned into the experimental group-training with poles with an integrated resistance shock absorber, EG (n = 21) and the control active group-training with classic poles, CG (n = 21). Functional fitness was measured with the Senior Fitness Test before and after an intervention lasting for 8 weeks (2 training sessions × 75 minutes per week). Two-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant interaction effects for aerobic endurance (F = 14.47, p < 0.001) and upper body strength (F = 5.98, p < 0.05), indicating greater improvement in the experimental group. Nordic walking training both with classic poles and with poles with an integrated resistance shock absorber is beneficial for older people and improves functional fitness over a short time period. However, the poles with an integrated resistance shock absorber provide additional resistance effort during marching, which causes increased muscle activation and results in improved muscle strength and aerobic endurance. Based on these results, it can be concluded that this kind of training could be applied in the complex health programs of seniors.Entities:
Keywords: Nordic walking; Senior Fitness Test; aging; functional fitness; functional training; physical activity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32218296 PMCID: PMC7177745 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flowchart of the study participants.
Average values and standard deviations for the general characteristics of the participants before the start of the experiment.
| EG ( | CG ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure |
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) | 64.24 | 2.86 | 65.14 | 3.43 |
| Body height (cm) | 160.57 | 4.80 | 160.57 | 7.36 |
| Body weight (kg) | 71.90 | 11.52 | 66.57 | 9.89 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.86 | 4.10 | 25.84 | 3.56 |
BMI—body mass index; EG—experimental group, CG—control group.
Figure 2General overview of the experiment.
Figure 3Correct position of upper limbs during Nordic walking with classic and resistant shock absorber (RSA) poles (A) and structure of RSA pole (B).
Figure 4Mean values and standard error of measurements for 30-second chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step in place and 8-foot up and go tests ((A–D), respectively) for the “time” factor (pre–post) in the experimental and control groups (EG and CG, respectively).* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (Scheffe post hoc test).